I doubt if any supplier has every surround size and configuration, and I doubt that it matters. Cutting and overlapping, as long as it isn't extreme (so that the surrounds start to tilt inward) and is done carefully is perfectly acceptable, and no effect on the results. So while all the favorable comments on Rick Cobb are a very good inducement to use him, he isn't the only good source.
And there are plenty of crappy or unknown quality speakers out there that, if you have to spend twenty bucks to get them up and running, aren't going to get refoamed. So using a buck fifty generic surround makes sense -- if its the wrong surround and the speaker turns out to be so promising that it seems justified to blow big bucks for the exact correct foam, then you are out a buck fifty, or if it turns out the speakers stink and you chuck them, you are out a buck fifty. If it was an experimental 20 buck investment, you might not make it. This was exactly my experience with a pair of Lowther PM 6s which had once had flat foam surrounds, but no more, which I sat on for years. Finally I cut down and spliced a pair of MAT Electronics foams to verify that the speakers did what I hoped, and then after long enough use to know it was worth it, spent the fifty or a hundred dollars for the skimpiest looking pair of surrounds (and the bonus minisucule spiders) I've ever seen, which turned out to be an extraordinarily sound investment. But I wouldn't have made it without trying first.