Spec's? Look's? name on the Front? what's the tipping factor for you??

Axcel

Accuphase all the way
I guess it all started with a NAD 7100 rec I had years ago I bought it due to the specs at the time. All my friends asked why I bought such an boring looking unit. Given the chance say 2 units one with superior specs but visually lacking the other better looking but inferior spec's or with a better name recognition which do you choose?? What's your top 3 requirements??
 
Register to hide this ad
I guess it all started with a NAD 7100 rec I had years ago I bought it due to the specs at the time. All my friends asked why I bought such an boring looking unit. Given the chance say 2 units one with superior specs but visually lacking the other better looking but inferior spec's or with a better name recognition which do you choose?? What's your top 3 requirements??

1)Sound
2)Sound
3)Sound
 
Regardless of what people will tell you, there are always factors other than sound quality that will be relevant. Price, physical size, and the esthetics are important to virtually everyone. Not everyone has the room or the money for Klipschorns, regardless of whether one likes them or not. So their sound is only one factor in the decision on whether to buy them.

Of the choices listed in the original post, the answer will depend upon how much better the one is, how much uglier the other one is, and whether it is the kind of thing that can be hidden (such as a power amp). In my case, assuming that I plan on actually keeping it for myself instead of reselling it, the name on it is fairly irrelevant, assuming that I know that the piece itself is of good quality. Most likely, I would pick the unit that performs better, but if the performance were nearly identical, and the one was the ugliest thing I ever saw while the other one was the most beautiful piece of equipment I ever saw, I would probably go with the more beautiful one, especially if it was something that would be prominently visible (such as speakers, which usually work best if not hidden away).

Another matter of importance is reliability, though it isn't hard to get fairly reliable equipment.

Basically, it is a combination of several factors, and each one has some importance in the decision on whether or not to get something. I suppose if I were to list the three most important, it would be price, sound, and reliability, though as mentioned above, other factors can come into play.
 
Sound, Looks, Brand experiance, And finally physical limitations. (it had to fit a specific size.

But then I don't collect persay I wanted a couple vintage systems and once I found the fit I stuck with it.
 
Depends on the part I'm buying... Most all items sound is a bit part of it... Then looks will usually play in there somwhere.. and of course I'm a freak for certain names, and depending on how all the others fit together, price is a major deciding factor..

SO.. my answer.. D: All Of The Above...
 
Budget, sound, looks.

I had to put budget first because I can't spend the money on the great sounding high dollar stuff.

Rob
 
At this point in my life, my priorities have to be a bit screwy. First, I consider the price, because I'm usually searching within a set price range. Then, the sound of it. Then, if there's a choice between two pieces with similar sound, aesthetics and convenience (usually size in my apartment).
 
Sound. Price. Aesthetics. The second two are kind of tied.

Examples...my DQ-10s will be leaving, because even though I like their sound and the price I paid, they honestly don't fit my place. If they were the only pair of speakers I had, they'd be fine, but they don't sound better than my main pair, so they need to leave to make room.

My Fisher system, SA300b, 400c, FM 200b was pricey after a total rebuild, but the sound and aesthetics more than make up for the price, which was still below what they could be sold for.
 
1) Sound
2) Utility/Features
3) Price/Budget available

Of course, if I don't have enough of #3, then there is no tipping factor, and I have to convince myself that I'm thrilled with what I already own.

I've never been brand loyal (Q-Tips and toilet paper excluded). although I do seem to go for the underdogs. If I like the sound, I'll keep it. A name means nothing to me. Unless your name is Klipsch, and you're from Hope, Arkansas.

Rob
 
1)Sound
2)Sound
3)Sound
To this I would add
4) sound
5) sound and
6) sound

I would not buy a piece of gear without hearing it in my system first. Looks are quite secondary. In fact, i labored over the decision to buy my current integrated because it ain't pretty (photos in sig.). But of the 5 units I auditioned, it was clearly the best sounding.
 
For a vintage receiver, for me:

- Looks, cool factor, brings back good memories

- Brand

- Power

- Sound, I assume the brands I would consider (vintage Marantz, Sherwood) are going to sound excellent

- Price / Value

- a special model, or somewhat rare (ex., original wood case in great condition on a Marantz)

Cheers, Snade
 
Sound, Price per performace ratio, company longevity, service and support (reliability) and looks in that order.
I scan the specs but many times they mean almost nothing telling you zero about its sound in your room.
 
Sound, price/value, designer, reliability.

I have a tendency to prefer equipment from designers/companies that have a reputation for designing & building high-quality, reliable, and good-sounding gear (e.g. Infinity/Arnie Nudell/Cary Christie, Nelson Pass, Roy Cooke, etc.)
 
What does it sound like? My amp is "budget". My CD player is great "at that price point". My TT is "hard to beat for the money". My phono amp is "A steal at this price". My speakers ain't cheap-but they are , again , performing well beyond thier cost. The right synergy of components can give you a giant killer of a system. IMO
 
Back
Top Bottom