The case for low-quality recordings

Great musicians and great performances like many in this thread, shine through primitive and poor recordings. The Magic Sam one above is amazing.

But most would be much happier playing on a 4 tube mantle radio with a full range speaker. Much more period correct. Like some vintage collectible shops that play records to get the 'vibe' happening.

It just screws with my head (and ears) a bit playing a CD with shocking quality recordings on decent HiFi gear.
 
I picked up a copy of a Sam and Dave album on a Stax label pressing and put it on the table for a bit and thought it sounded meh, put it in the box of future for sale records. Then a few weeks later I thought I'd give it another chance. Once I got over the fact it wasn't going to sound as good as some of my more modern recordings I started grooving on the music and it was great. It's still in my collection. ;)
 
I honestly think this crowd is about the music first, and the sound of its reproduction secondly.

I'll share this - I could quote hundreds of songs that move my soul, and sound like a well-executed fart, and some of these tunes you might even know.

But perhaps one of the most moving tunes I ever had, and have still, was back in 1996, when I got painfully dumped by my girlfriend at a very pivotal moment in my life.

Best buddy (and buddy of mine, still) came to see me, got me properly drunk, and sang to me. Somehow, I set up an EMERSON cheap-ass ghetto box with one channel out, and recorded the moment with its built-in condenser mic.

Do you know I played my buddy singing Merle Haggard's "Sometimes I Dream" about 5000 times?? It was cathartic, and helped me heal. And, it was just a great take.

And it sounded like complete and utter butt. Warble of crappy cassette, limited range, natural reverb.......and yet perfect.

Recording is simply the medium. The music is what matters.
 
Back
Top Bottom