Many years ago I was in a fondue restaurant in Switzerland, and the band was a bunch of Philipinos singing and 'playing' old Eagles songs. Their entire instrument ensemble was kazoos.
You haven't lived until you've heard Hotel California in this environment..
And yes, these guys were taking themselves very seriously. I think they might give your guys a run for the money, they could probably headline for them!
bs
OK, then. Bon Jovi.![]()
Yes, I am entitled to my own opinion, but that doesn't mean :screwy: I see Rush and Led Zeppelin listed as the "worst" band here. By your criteria, , they don't belong here.
I see Boston listed here as well. I'm not a big fan, per se, but if you look at sales/charts (from Wikipedia). Clearly no one likes them. :headscrat
The problem with "worst" bands is the things that fans really love about any group are the same things that others really dislike about those groups. To each their own, I guess.
How could we possibly have missed the Schlock & Roll of ELO?![]()
The problem with listing sales figures to justify a band being "good" is that it's an ad populum fallacy. That's like saying because, when it was manufactured, the Ford Pinto outsold the Posche 911 (if it was even made then), the Pinto was a better car. Or because McDonalds has sold umpteen gazillion hamburgers, that their burgers are the best in the world.
Popularity <> Quality.
Worst band or least liked, there is a difference. How about the disappointing GTR? I love one of the reviews, short and to the point: GTR SHT.
Yeah, somebody oughta put that poor woman in "4 Non-Blondes" outta her misery...And ours !
There is no debate. The King is awful. Long live the King!
I've always operated under the assumption that GG Allin is the worst recording artist of all time.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gg_allin
I remember watching them do a live performance on MTV (it was on the beach) in the early 90s, and her voice was AWFUL!!! She couldn't even hit a lot of the notes in that stupid "What's Goin' On?" song.