burmashave
Super Member
For those who think they need tone controls...on tube equipment, rolling tubes is equivalent to having tone controls. Just sayin'
Yup - I did a lot of rolling here until I found exactly what I was looking for, and haven't much touched it since.
(Doesn't stop me from trying a new combo every now and then, but I find myself returning to the same set time after time.)
.
exactly!!
.
.
Call that a prelude to mentioning I have a couple new drivers coming in the mail. <G>
PS - the set currently in the main amp is actually a bit dark for my tastes, but I tweak that up using a tube buffer with a brighter driver.
I find it isn't like that. Tube rolling is a session unto itself and a lot of fun for me. Listening sessions only occur after the tube rolling has gotten me where I wanted to go.
I guess it depends on how one listens.
If you pick a style and source of music and spend a long time getting ready and a long time listening then tube rolling is fun.
If you click on the music while making dinner and start with some classical, move to jazz and then stop at pop all within a half hour it makes changing tubes for the different sounds a bit harder.
Granted my main tube amp doesn't have tone controls but my old garage one does and while I don't often adjust them, they come in handy sometimes when wanting to cycle through a lot of different types of music while covered in grease.
Lately, i have been using the "Loudness" switch on a PAS, and on the Sansui AU70, and Scott 222C. When listening at a lower volume, a nicely balanced loudness function can be just the right amount of added bass and usually highs which one's ears are not very sensitive to, at lower decibels. This is noticeably better than have the tone control in circuit. It is actually just a cap and resistor and switch. Much less components than a full function tone control circuit.For those who think they need tone controls...on tube equipment, rolling tubes is equivalent to having tone controls. Just sayin'
Lately, i have been using the "Loudness" switch on a PAS, and on the Sansui AU70, and Scott 222C. When listening at a lower volume, a nicely balanced loudness function can be just the right amount of added bass and usually highs which one's ears are not very sensitive to, at lower decibels. This is noticeably better than have the tone control in circuit. It is actually just a cap and resistor and switch. Much less components than a full function tone control circuit.
You are not alone in that regard! It is the sound quality of tubes that has made its resurgence into mainstream audio a permanent fixture.Until I acquired an Anthem L2, I had no idea a preamp could have such lush and almost ethereal presentation without tone controls. Now, when I reintroduce my ss pre, a Mitsubishi DA-P10, true dual mono, it sounds so harsh to me now I can't stand it. I loved it before. Live and learn.
So are tube buffers. And there is nothing wrong with that. I like my music to sound good to me. I don't give a crap about how someone using completely different equipment from what I have, makes it sound on that rig (the record engineer/produced/etc.) like we are supposed to think that is the only way to listen to it. Can't be done, my room is different, another type of sound 'processor'.For those who think they need tone controls...on tube equipment, rolling tubes is equivalent to having tone controls. Just sayin'
You got that back together and in place already? I thought we were still figuring out what chips to try. I guess you like it. Great unit for the price.Tone controls are cheaper than tubeshowever either I have a tin ear or my system isn't bad because I usually don't even have them enabled (Lux TP-117, so no tube rolling possibilities there.)
You got that back together and in place already? I thought we were still figuring out what chips to try. I guess you like it. Great unit for the price.