vsx-49tx for music only

honestabe316

Oh Chief! - Jane Hathaway
I have been looking for a preamp for my Proton D1200 amp...I came across an Elite vsx-49tx for a super price. It has many pre-ins so could be used as a preamp. It would be like buying a rolls royce if you only drove to the corner store once per week, but I could do lots of fun stuff with this rig at a later time if I wanted too....it gets incredible reviews for two channel audio sound as well....so my question is this....would this work well as a preamp as opposed to a $250.. used preamp by say yamaha, carver, or maybe adcom??

Thanks guys

Scott
 
Register to hide this ad
If the price is right I say grab it. You could later make a nice surround system based on that unit.
 
I have an Elite VSX-49txi. This was Pioneer's TOTL HT receiver back in 2002, $4500. This thing kicked but, when it worked.

This model has a known failure (meaning it's common), where it loses all inputs. Only the amp works.

I took it to a shop for diag, and then bought the part they said was bad. Still no joy. I RMA'd that part, and the second one did the same thing.

I gave up on trying to repair this thing. If it's the motherboard, then the repair cost would be astronomical, and whose to say it wont fail again?

Because the amp is so good, I've been running a pre-out of a Elite 56txi (using a Elite SACD via firewire (the i)) into the 49, but that's another story.
 
I was able to grab a nad 1000 mint condition so im good on the preamp now....I still have my radar set for a decent elite though as I love the elite line..I have a vsx-72txv and have had no issues with it...I wouldnt mind having a spare kicking around....it might make sense pickin one up with similar issues for dirt cheap just to use as an amp.....us non wealthy audiophiles need to be creative in getting big dollar sound on a low budget
 
Funny I ran across this thread just now on a Google search and it's only a few weeks old. I have this unit. I chuckle frequently thinking of the 350.00 I spent on the thing for what it is. It puts so much modern equipment to such utter shame when you feel the build quality, the uber-cool LCD backlit touchscreen remote, and the clean distortion free power it puts out. I got it from a guy in the northwest who was revamping his HT system reluctantly due to needing HDMI support and it came like new in the factory carton with every piece of documentation, the remote and the MCACC microphone.

Frankly, I never intended to use it as a surround processor because it's woefully outdated in *some* ways, though its ability to accept 8 channel analog input means you could hook it up to a BDP-09FD and instantly have a relatively up to date system so long as your TV has sufficient HDMIs (I think my 141FD Pioneer has 3 or 4 so I'm good there). But I just thought it was a great cheap way to sneak in to a high quality Japanese made (not Malaysia or China like the modern ones) amp, heavily depreciated due to the outdated processor portion. At the time I acquired it, it was for my lovely JBL XPL-140s from 1991.

Now, here's where things get really interesting. I recently acquired a pair of B&W 802D speakers and figured that they'd take one look at this Pioneer "junk" and laugh their butts off then run the other way. To my amazement, the Pioneer makes beautiful sounds coupled with the 802Ds. In fairness, my room is quite small, but the Pioneer does not beg for mercy even at considerable listening levels. The bass is full, the highs are detailed and if I hid the amplifier completely from view, most people would never have any idea where the sound was coming from and would expect a much larger series of separates running these monsters. In most cases, people recommend running the 802Ds with no less than 200 clean watts per channel MINIMUM, yet the Pio is only 130 (and I'm only running two channels, I could even bi-amp if I wanted). In fact, the 802s are comparatively speaking louder volume level for volume level than the XPL140s, despite the XPLs being of significantly lower power rating spectrum. The 802s also double down to 4ohm when necessary, but I don't think I've come close to reaching that point.

Obviously, it's sacrilege to continue running the 802Ds this way, so I'm on the hunt for a nice McIntosh, Bryston, Mark Levinson or Classe amplifier to do so. But I'll be honest, I heard the 802Ds connected to proper Classe monoblocks before bringing them home, and the sound from the Pioneer is not dramatically different. I have a feeling I will get a really nice amp or even monoblocks and be hit with the "diminishing returns" slap once it's all said and done, but best not to risk the Pioneer clipping or otherwise damaging these speakers. And well, the eternity of listening to everyone say "you are doing those speakers a serious dis-service". What I do NOT want is anything made in China or even Malaysia, and unfortunately some modern Classe and certainly Rotel gear is. My eye is currently on either the Mac MC352 or MC501 monoblocks considering what modern Classe equipment costs by comparison. ML is a distant option and Bryston is somewhere around there.

Now what I'm wondering is the following... I have a budget for an amplifier but at this time I don't want to make the additional investment in a pre-amp. I just want to make sure the 802s have good solid amplification. I'm wondering if the 49TX can switch to pre-amp duty as the original poster was wanting in that case. Can't really tell looking out the outputs if it can serve as a true pre-amp, using it to switch sources and control volume, but without the amp. Seems like it would make an even more solid pre-amp than it is an amp, with the digital board failure caveat mentioned above. But then, if/when it ever dies, it was only a pittance of its original cost to begin with. And we're what, 13 years down the road now? Seems perfectly respectable to me (knock on some fake wood sides).

Oh, by the way, the Pioneer bug began for me when I literally found a DV-L90 Laserdisc/DVD/CD player just sitting there next to the dumpster at my apartment complex. It even had the manual just sitting on top of the case and a remote from some Pioneer CD changer. Curious, I brought it inside, plugged it in and found that it worked perfectly. It doesn't get a whole lot of use, but it's a cool piece of gear regardless, and I've already thought of a few music LDs that were never issued on DVD I'll eventually get a hold of.
 
Last edited:
I'm wondering if the 49TX can switch to pre-amp duty as the original poster was wanting in that case.

Yes, it can be done, using analog only.

You have to remove the U-shaped connecters that route F L&R to power amp in.

Refer to pg 78 of the manual (mine is the 49txi).

I attached a pic of my 49, where I am using the pre-out of my Marantz to the R&L input to the amp for 2 ch audio. The pre-outs for multi ch can be seen.
 

Attachments

  • 49txi jacks.jpg
    49txi jacks.jpg
    84 KB · Views: 63
Yes, it can be done, using analog only.

You have to remove the U-shaped connecters that route F L&R to power amp in.

Refer to pg 78 of the manual (mine is the 49txi).

I attached a pic of my 49, where I am using the pre-out of my Marantz to the R&L input to the amp for 2 ch audio. The pre-outs for multi ch can be seen.

Perfect. I have that, too. When you say "using analog only", do you mean using those analog outputs to the outside power amp, or that I have to take the items I currently have connected via Toslink and connect them to RCA analog inputs as well?

Thanks!
 
Perfect. I have that, too. When you say "using analog only", do you mean using those analog outputs to the outside power amp, or that I have to take the items I currently have connected via Toslink and connect them to RCA analog inputs as well?

Thanks!
The preouts to external amps from the 49 are RCAs (analog) only.

This should have no bearing on the interface of your source.
 
Wanted to come back and give a quick update to this thread.

Having had a Classe CP-800 in my possession for a few months now, I have a pretty good basis from which to speak when I say the Pioneer gives up nearly *nothing* to it in terms of performance as a pre-amp. The CP-800 of course has balanced outputs (four in total) which the Pioneer does not, yet I found that using them didn't yield any appreciable difference in sound quality.

The Pioneer continues to be one of the finest pieces of gear that company ever put out, bar none.

The only observation I do have is that even when using it as a pre-amp only, AND having the speakers A and B completely disabled, the thing STILL gets as hot as it does when driving a speaker load. I'm beginning to wonder if I can open it up and somehow disable the output transistors (not permanently of course), or whatever it is that gets so damn warm in there. It's no fun on a hot summer day having this thing add even more heat to a smaller room.

Of course, if the heat I'm feeling is the massive transformer, that probably won't change much.
 
I am currently using a yamaha cx-2 preamp that I picked up on audiogon. Its a nice match for the proton. I am always on the lookout for well priced pioneer elite units as play toys. Sony ESMV equipment seems much harder to come by but the pioneer elite is much more common. I have an adcom 5400 that would work nicely with an elite as a pre and tuner.....the only issue being the poor cmve reception the elites have. I know they were designed for home theater and not Gmail but they still seem weaker than they should be imho......
 
Does anyone know if the "DIGITAL OUT" optical outputs on the 49tx are TRUE pre-amp digital outs, or do they just pass along a fixed digital output from one of the digital ins? Right now it's serving as a pre-amp for a pair of Bang and Olufsen BeoLab 5s, but they also support digital input direct so that would obviously be the preferred input option IF the volume can still be controlled from the 49tx.
 
Does anyone know if the "DIGITAL OUT" optical outputs on the 49tx are TRUE pre-amp digital outs, or do they just pass along a fixed digital output from one of the digital ins? Right now it's serving as a pre-amp for a pair of Bang and Olufsen BeoLab 5s, but they also support digital input direct so that would obviously be the preferred input option IF the volume can still be controlled from the 49tx.

In case anyone was wondering, the digital out on the 49tx is a FIXED OUTPUT of the digital inputs only. In other words, it is not volume controlled and will not pass through any of the analog input devices.
 
Thanks for the heads up! This stupid receiver... so damn complicated and rediculous to me cause I'm a 2ch music guy.. but so far it just kills anything else I own in terms of sound quality and raw power. She gets very loud but stays very clean and detailed. Whatever dac they use is also amazing.. Spotify going toslink to the vsx makes streaming more than tolerable. The yamaha dspa 2070 3090 and 1000 I owned in the past couldn't muster up this much power without clipping badly IMO. Apples to oranges tho because I have a feeling the rxz9 would smoke this thing ;-) whaddya say Yammi fans?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom