There are many - if you google “sansui transfomer toroidal” it brings up a few images as a starting point.
Amps like the AU-20000 B-2101/2102, AU-919 (EI and toroidal combo), and many of the big receivers spring to mind immediately.
I also seem to recall that the transformers for some of the bigger x-balanced amps are toroidals potted in a square metal enclosure, but I’ll need to find pics/info to confirm that so take it with a grain of salt for the time being.
It looks to me like the AU-D55X does.
I have one that I need to repair.
I’m sure that someone else can give you a more thorough list.
AND, it has been alleged that some models have a toroidal shaped enclosure but are suspected to be EI type transformers submerged in hard potting compound, conveniently disguising what they actually aresome of the bigger x-balanced amps are toroidals potted in a square metal enclosure
- the AU-D11 II being one of the ones under suspicion, I'll leave it to your imagination to decide what I think about that So, that round can in my AU-D55X might not be a toroidal xformer? It boggles my mind to think that Sansui would try to disguise an EI xformer as a toroidal one. I’m not doubting you, John. It’s just that I would think the expense involved would not make business sense, especially for a company first founded as a transformer manufacturer. If exposed at that time, I would think that it would have been very bad for their reputation. Maybe I hold Sansui in too high of a regard?AND, it has been alleged that some models have a toroidal shaped enclosure but are suspected to be EI type transformers submerged in hard potting compound, conveniently disguising what they actually are- the AU-D11 II being one of the ones under suspicion, I'll leave it to your imagination to decide what I think about that
- being as I am such a fan of that model.
More Toroidal models AU-9900/11000 & AU-9900A/11000A
I agree with you, a daft thing to do if you are a company with Sansui's roots and reputation. In the pictures of the allegation (on here), I did see what looked like a squarish shadow in the potting compound, but far from conclusive in my opinion. I think the simplest way to prove/disprove it, would be to crank the suspect amplifier for a couple of hours (no hardship)It’s just that I would think the expense involved would not make business sense, especially for a company first founded as a transformer manufacturer. If exposed at that time, I would think that it would have been very bad for their reputation. Maybe I hold Sansui in too high of a regard?
Great idea, John! And doable, with modern technology. I have no idea of the cost of a thermal imaging device, but it’s conceivable that isn’t expensive. You can probably buy one on Amazon!I agree with you, a daft thing to do if you are a company with Sansui's roots and reputation. In the pictures of the allegation (on here), I did see what looked like a squarish shadow in the potting compound, but far from conclusive in my opinion. I think the simplest way to prove/disprove it, would be to crank the suspect amplifier for a couple of hours (no hardship)- then use a thermal imaging device to see what the transformer looks like.
![]()
(I like this guy!)It IS in a round can. I don’t have a photo handy.I did found the follow text in a 1985 Sansui brochure stating a toroidal transformer is present:
View attachment 2670438
So now it looks like a duck, it is described as a duck, ..
Have fun
-John-
Which Sansui integrated amplifiers run toroidal transformer(s) and are good/desirable?

Look like toroids to me. Nice big ones, that can source a lot of current. Just don’t have a cover.Is this AU-517 counts or ?……![]()
I didn’t realize that the 517 had those, since the 717 doesn’t.
I manage to blow up oneLook like toroids to me. Nice big ones, that can source a lot of current. Just don’t have a cover.
I didn’t realize that the 517 had those, since the 717 doesn’t.
so only way to make it work again, was winding two new ones.