Beyond Catman's excellent recommendations for cart loading, which is directly related to matching the motor/generators into the phono stage, all of the listed cartridges _can_ work well for our LP applications.
The differentiator, IMHO, is the age and overall quality of the stylus assembly being used. That is, trackability (an old Shure marketing term, that!), separation, frequency response, and similar measures are more related to how the stylus movement is coupled into the motor/generator in the body.
Back in the 70s as a bench tech, I recall have many different cart bodies and stylii in various states of abuse/disassembly lying around. On the occasional times when I was caught up with repairs (rarely!), I would try different combinations of by clipping off plastic parts of the stylii so that different assemblies could be used across the whole Shure line. It was fun and, essentially, I learned that most of the stylii could drive the motor/generator to full output and they could, with some dinking, be used interchangably.
Shure, OTOH, wanted to differentiate its product line and did so by dividing their stylii formats into the product lineups we now know of to do so.
What I'm suggesting, here, is that while we have quite a few options these days and with the various Shure product lineups of the past, most all of them are and can be quite good in their right. Further, there are very few of us who have had the experience of all the Shure models across time. This coupled with the age of some of the stylii we're able to get these days will limit the ability to declare one, absolute-uber-winner.
Cheers,
David