• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

Pioneer SX-737 No Sound, No Relay Click, Lights On

A thing still bugging me, is the fact this Q1 has a difference of 1.5 Volts between B and E. This is simply not possible if a normal transistor is good (unless it is a darlington transistor or the ACTUAL collector is open circuit).
One thing to note is whether the collector is actually attached, is this 48V measured on the track side or the transistor itself (should be present on the transistor metal tab so easy to reach).
So the question @golfnut is: did you measure the actual 48V somewhere on the trace, or on the collector of the transistor itself (in the end, the metal tab having this voltage is easy to reach)

The theory is, if considering the 22k and 16k resistors are good the the voltage which should be on the emitter of Q1 can be calculated from the base voltage of Q2 divided by 16 and multiplied by (16+22), so 38/16 times the voltage present on the base of q2. This Q1 emitter output voltage should be there regardless of the load. The voltage on the base of Q1 should be some 0.7 volts higher than its emitter only.

(side note: Another way to check grounding of the circuit card (power off!) is checking the resistance between pin 5 and pin 18 of this power board.
Pin 5 and 18 are NOT connected to each other on the power board itself, but it still should measure as a short through cabling and board ground connetions)


(@golfnut do not worry about others get overloaded, just assume not everybody avail at all time or feel like putting time in some remote piece of electronics somewhere on the planet. Every tech started somewhere and most threw things in the garbage which they would have repaired within an hour having present knowledge and measuring tools)
 
@gslikker I agree with you, that the voltage difference of 1.5 Volt between B and E on Q1 is too high, and strange as well the voltage difference of 0.1 Volt between B and E on Q2 is too low.
BUT could that be caused by the disconnected R10, to keep the Equalizer Amplifier Assembly AWF-011 isolated?

How would you proceed from here?

My next step would be some test on the protection board.
More test on the power amp to get pin 1 and 3 sorted out
In between if time permits, solving the issue on the AWF-011

Thoughts?
 
@golfnut
With R10 lifted, the voltage on pin 14, 15 and 16 look stable and it indicates one more issue on the Equalizer Amplifier Assembly AWF-011.

The AWF-011 has no influence on the protection relay, so it’s up to you if you leave it for later or work on it in the meantime.
Tell us which transistors are factory installed.
What you should check are the installed transistors and if you find SA725 and SC1313 change them. Take care with the pinout.
Post a picture from the part side, before you change parts.
I would leave R10 out until the transistors checked and the bad ones replaced.

The same with the caps. At least replace C1, C2, C11, C13,
If it were mine, I would not hesitate and replace all 6 transistors and every single electrolytic on that board as well.

Please take your time, use the lessons learned, take pictures before you change something and test every old part, make notes and test as well every new part before you install it.

Moving on to the protection board AWM-025.
Provide the actual dcv with black to ground for

Pin 1
Pin 3
D5 anode and cathode
D6 anode and cathode
D7 anode and cathode
 
Last edited:
A thing still bugging me, is the fact this Q1 has a difference of 1.5 Volts between B and E. This is simply not possible if a normal transistor is good (unless it is a darlington transistor or the ACTUAL collector is open circuit).
One thing to note is whether the collector is actually attached, is this 48V measured on the track side or the transistor itself (should be present on the transistor metal tab so easy to reach).
So the question @golfnut is: did you measure the actual 48V somewhere on the trace, or on the collector of the transistor itself (in the end, the metal tab having this voltage is easy to reach)
I measured on the transistor leg not the foil side. This Q1 is a new transistor. I took out the old one when it was pulled and tested good. It is not the Tip41 I inquired but the D313.
The theory is, if considering the 22k and 16k resistors are good the the voltage which should be on the emitter of Q1 can be calculated from the base voltage of Q2 divided by 16 and multiplied by (16+22), so 38/16 times the voltage present on the base of q2. This Q1 emitter output voltage should be there regardless of the load. The voltage on the base of Q1 should be some 0.7 volts higher than its emitter only.

(side note: Another way to check grounding of the circuit card (power off!) is checking the resistance between pin 5 and pin 18 of this power board.
Pin 5 and 18 are NOT connected to each other on the power board itself, but it still should measure as a short through cabling and board ground connetions)
See picture. It measures .2ohms. Please note that R10 resistor leg is still lifted.
(@golfnut do not worry about others get overloaded, just assume not everybody avail at all time or feel like putting time in some remote piece of electronics somewhere on the planet. Every tech started somewhere and most threw things in the garbage which they would have repaired within an hour having present knowledge and measuring tools)
Thanks for this! Much appreciated.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_8562.jpeg
    IMG_8562.jpeg
    240.7 KB · Views: 2
@golfnut
With R10 lifted, the voltage on pin 14, 15 and 16 look stable and it indicates one more issue on the Equalizer Amplifier Assembly AWF-011.

The AWF-011 has no influence on the protection relay, so it’s up to you if you leave it for later or work on it in the meantime.
For the time being, I’ll leave this for later. However looking at the transistors, they all have the black legs. I have read where that could be an issue.
Tell us which transistors are factory installed.
What you should check are the installed transistors and if you find SA725 and SC1313 change them. Take care with the pinout.
Post a picture from the part side, before you change parts.
I would leave R10 out until the transistors checked and the bad ones replaced.

The same with the caps. At least replace C1, C2, C11, C13,
If it were mine, I would not hesitate and replace all 6 transistors and every single electrolytic on that board as well.

Please take your time, use the lessons learned, take pictures before you change something and test every old part, make notes and test as well every new part before you install it.

Moving on to the protection board AWM-025.
Provide the actual dcv with black to ground for

Pin 1
(R10 leg still lifted, relay clicks off and on)
Jumps around from -.04 to -.11
After waiting a couple minutes it settled to .067
Also jumps around -.02 to -.11
After waiting a couple minutes it settles down to .047.
D5 anode and cathode
D6 anode and cathode
D7 anode and cathode
Jumps around mostly except one leg each on D6-7. See picture
 

Attachments

  • IMG_8564.jpeg
    IMG_8564.jpeg
    235.5 KB · Views: 4
Sorry, but I like to see more voltages. Please use the list for a better overview.
And tell us, what parts you have changed already on the protection board.
Sorry I must have missed the list. Which list are you referring to? I thought I was going by your post.

Edit: I see it now.
 
The jumping around voltages all over has me super suspicious of a bad ground reference still. Just can't think of where to look aside from Pin 18 on the PSU.

With power on, measure DC between PSU pin 18 and chassis. Then between PSU pin 18 and each board ground. Anything more than a few mV or anything that wanders points to a ground problem.

Board Grounds:

Power Amp - Pin 11
Control Amp - Pin 4
EQ Amp - Pin 4
Tuner - Pin 2
Protection - Pin 4
 
The jumping around voltages all over has me super suspicious of a bad ground reference still. Just can't think of where to look aside from Pin 18 on the PSU.

With power on, measure DC between PSU pin 18 and chassis. Then between PSU pin 18 and each board ground. Anything more than a few mV or anything that wanders points to a ground problem.
Pin 18 = 0
Board Grounds:

Power Amp - Pin 11 = 0
Control Amp - Pin 4 = .3mv
EQ Amp - Pin 4 = 0
Tuner - Pin 2 = .3mv
Protection - Pin 4 = 0
Please see above ground readings
 
Numbers appear to be all over the place on some or most. See attached. Note that no parts have been removed or replaced on this board.
48VDC on Pin 3? Is that right? That used to be much lower. I'm not even sure how that number is possible.
 
There are some issues on the protection board with influence on Q6 and Q7
I’m not always convinced from your measured voltage, but if your reading on pin 1 and 3 (AWM-025) is really below 80 MilliVolt for now, there is a good chance that you can get it down with a new DC and offset adjustment.

But before that, please post all the caps you have changed on the power amp AWH-033.
Sorry to ask for it, but I lost track on that.
 
48VDC on Pin 3? Is that right? That used to be much lower. I'm not even sure how that number is possible.

There are some issues on the protection board with influence on Q6 and Q7
I’m not always convinced from your measured voltage, but if your reading on pin 1 and 3 (AWM-025) is really below 80 MilliVolt for now, there is a good chance that you can get it down with a new DC and offset adjustment.

But before that, please post all the caps you have changed on the power amp AWH-033.
Sorry to ask for it, but I lost track on that.
No worries. The only caps I have replaced on the AWH-033 are the blue caps at C1 and C2. I Used 4.7uf 80v

Edit: the leg is still lifted on R9 AWR-057
 

Attachments

  • IMG_8565.jpeg
    IMG_8565.jpeg
    334.2 KB · Views: 3
Last edited:
Edit: the leg is still lifted on R9 AWR-057
Was that a typo or what do you mean?

Dont forget from post #484
The AWF-011 has no influence on the protection relay, so it’s up to you if you leave it for later or work on it in the meantime.
..... I would leave R10 out until the transistors (on the AWF-011) checked and the bad ones replaced.
 
Was that a typo or what do you mean?
I forgot to mention that the resistor leg was still lifted that’s all.
Dont forget from post #484
The AWF-011 has no influence on the protection relay, so it’s up to you if you leave it for later or work on it in the meantime.
..... I would leave R10 out until the transistors (on the AWF-011) checked and the bad ones replaced.
Ok. We can come back to that.

Should I do the DC offset and bias adjustment now?
 
Wait with the DC offset and bias adjustment for now.
To find the issue on the protection board we could to more testing, or what I would do on mine, I would replace at least

Q1 and Q2, old 2sc869 with KSC1845FTA
Q6, old 2sc945 with KSC2383YTA
Q7, old 2sc1384 with KSC2690AYS
Q3, Q4 and Q5 only if they are bad.
C1 and C2 as well, if you have to order them new, go for film caps.

The 2SC1384 relay driver (Q7) is a known culprit for getting old and tired, and dropping the relay randomly. Many will add a flyback diode on the board across the relay coil to protect Q7, cathode to pin 10, anode to pin 9.
Also the overload detectors (Q1 + Q2) will cause random dropping if they get leaky with age.

---------------

If you prefer more testing, follow the procedure in this thread.
Don’t get confused with the SX-828, but it has the same protection board AWM-025 like the SX-737.

easy quick protect board testing procedure
Did Pioneer use two protection boards in the SX-828?


And ONE more Time, to test every old and new transistor before you replace them!
The lead arrangements for the transistors, original or replacement, are all over the place with ecb, ebc, bce and beyond...
Be SURE it's NOT a new Fairchild c945 which is ebc versus an original c945 which is ecb or a new fairchild c945c which is ecb.

You would not believe just how many problems THAT has caused.
 
Last edited:
Wait with the DC offset and bias adjustment for now.
To find the issue on the protection board we could to more testing, or what I would do on mine, I would replace at least

Q1 and Q2, old 2sc869 with KSC1845FTA
I’m waiting on these to arrive. I ordered these last week.
Q6, old 2sc945 with KSC2383YTA
I guess I need to order this.
Q7, old 2sc1384 with KSC2690AYS
Here is the old 2sc1384
Here is the KSC2690
Q3, Q4 and Q5 only if they are bad.
C1 and C2 as well, if you have to order them new, go for film caps.

The 2SC1384 relay driver (Q7) is a known culprit for getting old and tired, and dropping the relay randomly. Many will add a flyback diode on the board across the relay coil to protect Q7, cathode to pin 10, anode to pin 9.
Also the overload detectors (Q1 + Q2) will cause random dropping if they get leaky with age.

---------------

If you prefer more testing, follow the procedure in this thread.
Don’t get confused with the SX-828, but it has the same protection board AWM-025 like the SX-737.

easy quick protect board testing procedure
Did Pioneer use two protection boards in the SX-828?


And ONE more Time, to test every old and new transistor before you replace them!
The lead arrangements for the transistors, original or replacement, are all over the place with ecb, ebc, bce and beyond...
Be SURE it's NOT a new Fairchild c945 which is ebc versus an original c945 which is ecb or a new fairchild c945c which is ecb.

You would not believe just how many problems THAT has caused.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_8567.jpeg
    IMG_8567.jpeg
    239 KB · Views: 4
  • IMG_8568.jpeg
    IMG_8568.jpeg
    258.5 KB · Views: 4
Back
Top Bottom