Originally posted by Jon S
The AMT-3 Rock Monitors have two problems as they age. The grill is made of particle board which deteriorates (crumbles) as they age. The second issue is that the foam surrounds should be shot by now. Make sure that the Heil tweeters are fully functional as they may be non-repairable. I thought they sounded great back in the 70s but realized later that they are highly colored in sound when compared to newer speakers.
Do an A/B comparison with any new speaker and the monitors sound pretty lame.
Damn, you must be talking about a COMPELETELY different speaker than the pair I restored.
The grilles on these were masonite frame, and were just fine.
As for colorations- I find them FAR LESS colored, than pretty much ANY speaker from the 70s or 80s, save stuff of the ilk of the JBL 250Ti, Marantz DS940 and such. In fact, the pair we had, could pretty much hang with brand new high-end speakers... I directly compared them with Tannoy Saturn S-10s, Vandersteen 2CE Signatures, Boston VR-M90s, Elons, JBLs, and more. What impressed me with the AMT3, was the completely DIFFERENT character that it had, than the AMT1. The AMT3 had VERY fast midrange, very well-defined and tight bass, imaged like a m____f____ (to use the language of Samuel L. Jackson

), and had overall dynamics that very few speakers of ANY price could beat.
Of course, it may have to do with room placement, as well as sources, amps and such... the system I was using, consisted of a Rega Planet 2000 CD player, an Eastern Electric MiniMax tube line-stage preamp, and an original Marantz 8B tube amp. That combo is about as trouble-free as a source/amp chain as I've ever encountered.
As for value- the pair we had, we traded for other equipment... we got about $800 in trade value for them. IMHO, we may have let them go too cheaply...
Regards,
Gordon.