• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

What bands don't you "get"?

Most pop music i don't get, it all sound so much the same. It's not timeless either and will be forgotten almost as soon as it was released.

The Beatles I don't get. They wrote some catchy tunes and I don't hate them but I just don't get their mass appeal. Entire projects are devoted to them still to this day. Same with the Rolling Stones. Their music to me isn't bad yet other then a few songs nothing special.

I don't get the appeal of hip hop either. To me it's a repetitious loop ad infinitum. It's about the only genre I really do hate.
 
Not defending any one or any band but......
Listen to The Who "Live At Leeds" If you don't get it you don't understand rock music
I've heard from many people that it is the best live rock album, period. I found it at a garage sale a week ago but it was so banged up I passed. I'm still looking for it "cheap".
 
Most pop music i don't get, it all sound so much the same. It's not timeless either and will be forgotten almost as soon as it was released.

The Beatles I don't get. They wrote some catchy tunes and I don't hate them but I just don't get their mass appeal. Entire projects are devoted to them still to this day. Same with the Rolling Stones. Their music to me isn't bad yet other then a few songs nothing special.

I don't get the appeal of hip hop either. To me it's a repetitious loop ad infinitum. It's about the only genre I really do hate.
I like the Beatles. Just not as some apparently do. I think the stones suck. I play bass in R&R bands and have to play their stuff from time to time. Crowds like it so wadayagonnado? It's just what people heard when they were young and they were rebels and that's that. 'Cept I was one of those kids and their music sounded like noise to me.
 
Bartok, Copeland, Ravel, Stravinsky, Shostakovich, Prokofiev, Boulez, Rachmaninov, Gershwin, Glass, Bernstein, Respighi, Williams, Holst and others; it’s wonder that anybody gets into the music of these unimaginative hacks. ;)


Danny, you gotta give it another try…..

Nice. :thmbsp:
 
Pink Floyd.

[rant]
Good God, people, how many threads on DSOTM are really necessary. Just the fact that everyone on AK knows the title of this album by its initials screams, "enough, already". Does anyone refer to a certain Beatles album as SPLHCB? I think not.
[/rant]


I get this! I'd like to listen to DSOTM about ten times for every one time I feel like listening to SPLHCB... and I do! :D

The Beatles I "get" because I remember when they first emerged and became popular. I think they are given perhaps a bit too much idolization today, but that is the way of the business --just look at Elvis Presley, or for an equivalent in film, James Dean. There is money to be made from Dead People and defunct groups.

It's interesting how many different opinions come out in this thread; it shows how different we all are in our listening preferences.

I have very eclectic tastes, across almost all genres, although I'll admit there are very few rap/hip-hop songs that I like. Yet I'm picky about individual artists, and even different albums or songs within an artists' oeuvre. For example, I've always liked Elton John's first (eponymous) album, but except for a few single songs here or there, I haven't liked much he's done since.

I love Tschaikovsky, but it's things like this fourth and fifth symphonies that move me, not the more popular but "lightweight" Nutcracker that he is better known for. A lot of "serious classical" people dismiss him as too "lightweight" because of those popular works, but what about Mozart? His stuff is almost all "lightweight" to my ears, and I don't quite get the status he's given, except for the back story about how young he was when he wrote much of it.

In one sense, I can "get" The Black Eyed Peas who just performed in the Superbowl, but I'd be delighted to never hear another song of theirs in my life. The over-processed autotune voice just doesn't do it for me. Having designed some serious costumes, I'm not too impressed with the guys hair cover thing. Star Trek's Borg looked much better. The best thing about their performance was probably the design and precise execution of the show around them (lit up dancers and such), and Slash, whose guitar volume was sadly way beneath the girl singer's voice (bad mixing). I'll take the original version any day. Overall, it was a well-executed show, which I can appreciate, but it still left me not very "entertained".

That isn't anything against modern groups per se; I can enjoy Coldplay, for example, or some Travis and other groups. But The BEP, (most of) Lady Gaga (I'll admit some of her tunes are catchy, potential "ear worms") and some others --while part of me intellectually can analyse and understand their success-- just have no appeal to me, at all.
 
Joan Baez - nice voice - too bad she's a sanctimonious prig
Dave Matthews - just don't get it...I try...
Rolling Stones (post Tattoo You) - retire already!
Lynyrd Skynyrd - <sigh>
No Doubt - <sigh>

At this point you can add a bunch of HP Super Disc Picks / Stereophile R2D4 selections.

-D
 
I don't get classical music. There's no emotion in it for me, just boring perfection and most of it gets me on edge.
 
Hawkwind - I just don't get the appeal of all the random re-verb effects and pointless noises plus they never sound that amazing when they do actually play.
The Beatles - They really aren't that good I mean they are far form the worst that the 1960's had to offer but they just strike me as average.
The Grateful Dead - This one I can't explain, Musically I see the talent and skill but I really just don't care.

There are more I just can't be arsed to list them at the moment. :D
 
Last edited:
A few groups i just cant bring myself to like would be-

Bruce Springsteen, totally tried to find interest but just not there for me, i am not even sure i spelled his last name properly and don't care LOL.

Lynard Skinard, i even pu a couple of used albums and gave them a spin but still just left me cold.

There have been a few groups that i have had from mild dislike to total despisery for (dispisery is that a word?) but for various reasons i found myself later appreciating them, be it from seeing a documentory or a live show or acquiring a used record in with others and giving it a spin just to check out something different.

most notable for me would be Rush, Rush for me was the group that there would have been a time that they would have topped the list of despised groups and when i say despise i mean DESPISE! my main dislike i guess would have been Geddys voice, that and the overdone and overcomplicated IMO musical arrangements, but recently watching a TV documentary on them gave me appreciation for just how talented they are, for example drummer Neil Pert, what can i say the guys an animal on the drums soooo good! he gets my vote for one the best best drummers of all time, and Alex Lifesons guitar playing is certainly worth high praise, as for Geddy Lee well what can i say once i saw how he played that bass and heck even his vocals have improved with age and experience, putt-em all together and you got one bad-ass group of talented guys who can play those really complex musical arrangements that i used to hate and not only play them but play them to perfection!

cheers chris
 
That genaric metal background music that’s on just about every car, motorcycle, or stunt show on cable. I like those shows but the music just makes it unbarable after about 10 minutes. (Except that one show where the father and sons constantly yell at each other and occasionally build a motorcycle…)
 
That genaric metal background music that’s on just about every car, motorcycle, or stunt show on cable. I like those shows but the music just makes it unbarable after about 10 minutes. (Except that one show where the father and sons constantly yell at each other and occasionally build a motorcycle…)

"Metal Muzak":yes:
 
After the half time show I really don’t get the Black Eyed Peas. Without a fully functioning autotune that was audio hell. Fergie’s O.K. if I turn the sound off (and at least she didn’t soil herself)
 
Here's the deal: the problem some folks have with The Dan is that 3-4 tunes have been BEAT TO DEATH by so-called "classic rock" radio....then they have the gall to play "Black Friday" or something similar & call it a "deep cut". Even a devoted DanFan such as myself gets more than a little tired hearing "Do It Again" for the 10,567,889th time.
And of course it's not just Steely Dan that's become the victim of this, not by far.

There are "top hit" songs that get overplayed on oldies/classic rock/whatever name or flavor it is, then there are many other songs that may fit well within the station's "flavor" that NEVER get played.

I've finally given up on commercial radio. There are college stations that play amazing stuff I would have never heard had I not been listening.

And now I've just come up with a possible conspiracy theory - I bet there's a really strong correlation between bands get played on the radio and those whose CD's are (or were 10-20 years ago) in print and available at the record stores (probably just about EVERTHING is available on iTunes including stuff that never made it to CD, but I haven't looked).
 
Back
Top Bottom