muovimies
Super Member
in Malaysia to be precise. over here old records are not as commonly found and much less in high quality like in the West. About the Japanese pressings, I read elsewhere that some people have different opinion on them compared to US or European pressings. What is really going on?
I don't have a lot of Japanese pressings, but the ones I have are simply excellent in every way. Especially the technical pressing quality seems superior, spindle holes absolutely spot on centered etc - often when I grab one of them, my first thought is this is how every record should've been done. But admittedly the sample size is rather small... still, I've yet to see a Japanese pressing that was substandard. As for mastering, I can't say I've noticed any significant difference in general, like sometimes I've seen it mentioned Japanese masterings tend more on the lean side compared to western, or in some other way aim for a different "sound". I can't say I've noticed anything like this. But I don't think there's a reason to go out of your way to hunt down a Japanese pressing for a record you can more easily find western pressings for, but I also can't think of a reason to hunt down western copies if Japanese are more abundant in your neck of the woods.
In terms of ultimate audiophilia and sound quality, I think often the country of origin of the music might have the edge because they get to use the original master tape, while in many cases pressings made on the other side of the world would've used a copy, so they'd have at least one more generation of tape loss. In any case every pressing is different and even every record is an individual, so there you go... I think there's a certain exotica to Japanese pressings that appeals to the western record enthusiast - while for Japanese / Asian hobbyists an US pressing of an US based artist would probably seem more authentic.