• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

4x JBL 4367 Adventures

NavnFugl

New Member
This is a continuation of my thread "JBL 4367 Am I crazy or stupid?"
: https://audiokarma.org/forums/index.php?threads/jbl-4367-am-i-crazy-or-stupid.1039914/

Sometime in October 2023 all 4 speakers arrived, I wasn't home for the event sadly.
My father took it upon him to replace our JBL array 1400 with 1 set of the JBL 4367 for the time being.

He was well impressed by their sonics and dynamics which he told me over the phone.
But the idea of stacking the speakers would have to wait until I was back home to help lift the speakers into place.

It wouldn't be until early December before I was back home to test, evaluate and assess.
During that time my father had the opportunity to further his impressions.

Having read a lot of good talk about class A amplifiers I've always wanted to try one.
I've a soft spot for good looks and a no BS approach to a manufacturers product and philosophy, hence why I've grown an interest to the Accuphase products.
Around November we had the opportunity to acquire two Accuphase A-75 60w into 8ohms Class A power amplifiers, so we did, for testing purposes.
They would arrive close to Christmas (Coincidence?)

It's now early December, I've arrived home.
As I enter the livingroom I'm taken aback by the shear size of the 4367 compared to the 1400, they barely fit in their current position in regards to the TV and door.

It wasn't long before a listening session started.
I indentified the 4367's to be much more "horny" "Bright" "Sharp" than the 1400 on the top end, much less forgiving of the source material and other components in the system to my ear.
The bass was astonashing, so much so, that I've decided the JBL Array 1500 subs aren't a good match for the 4367, therefore they're out of service for now.

A week of listening has now been done, it's time to mount the other set of 4367's on top and hope the Mark Levinson 532h doesn't explode due to the excitement.
5 pieces of soft nonslip material was placed, 1 in each corner and 1 in the middle, to avoid scratches and what not.
Lifting the 4367's into place was a challenge due to their weight and the height they needed to climb, but it was done.
Speaker cable is connected from the bottom 4367 to the top "Piggybacking" sort of to achieve a parallel setup in regards to what the amp sees.

When all was set and done, double checked for correct wiring, our fingers were crossed as the 532h was turned on.
As the rest of the components were turned on and music started flowing, we were relieved to hear that all 8(!) drivers were playing as intended. Mission success, so far.

This experiment did exactly what I'd hoped for. It was now a wall of sound, incredible soundstage. These speakers out of the box are superb at creating a live sound, now it's as if the stage is right in front of me.
Initially my father wasn't too keen on the idea, but after hearing the results he wouldn't have it any other way.

A thing that was bugging me was the horn, it wasn't being tammed correctly by our gear.
For now, we were awaiting the arrival of the first A-75 to conduct further tests.

And it's here. Out comes the 532h carefully and put into storage.
A-75 is connected and turned on, we wait the appropriate time to start playing music as it's warming up.

It's immediately apparent that the sound has changed, for the better.
So much more detail and texture, it's a joy to listen to.
Furthermore, it's even a bliss to listen to at low volume as every nuance is kept and preserved.
The bass is so much faster and precise.

All in all, I'd say all aspects of the sound has improved tremendously.
But the horn driver, still, is a bit too bright and "in your face" for my liking.
It might also be the way it interacts with our room, I'll admit our room is a livingroom and not a listeningroom.
Incorporated in our system we've the McIntosh MEN220 to help with the aforementioned livingroom acoustics.
This does help enormously, but now we're at the point where I'm douting if solid state is correct amplification for the horn driver.

The 2nd A-75 arrived.
My intention was to do a horizontal biamp configuration with the help of the MEN220's built-in active crossover, crossover set to 700hz as per the 4367 whitepaper.
1 A-75 handles the 4 woofers. 1 A-75 handles the 4 horns.
This further increased the soundstage and separation as I imagined it would.
But it also allowed me to do something else, adjust the volume of the horns compared to the woofers.
This is due to the A-75's built in gain switch. It goes from 28db at max, to 25db at -3, 22 at -6 and 16db at -12.
As it states in the 4367 white paper, the horn driver is much more efficent that the woofer.
Ergo I tried to adjust the A-75 which handles the horns to the -6db and viola, now the horn and woofer is much more closely matched in volume to great effect.

Now, we're almost done.
This -6db trick really allowed the system to be played louder, cleaner and more dynamic than ever before.
However, I can't change the sonics of the A-75 by adjusting the gain, and I still wasn't satisfied on some tracks with a lot of treble.
So I looked towards tubes, a 2 channel tube power amplifier to replace the A-75 which drives the horns.

And I found one, to be my test subject initially.
Accuphase doesn't dable in tubes, so I looked at forums and came to the conclusion that I'd like to pair it with another Japanese brand, Luxman.
A MQ-88uC was acquired. I looked at it's 25w per channel in 8ohms and calculated it's gain to be around 24.02db.
Previously I thought it was important to gain match when biamping, now I understand it can depend on the drivers just as much.

With the A-75 driving the horns disconnected and the MQ-88uC taking it's place we've finally arrived at our destiantion.
The MQ-88uC sounded it's best connected via the 16ohm tap. I first tried the 8ohm tap (the horns and 16ohm, but when run in parallel I understand that would be 8ohm) but it just sounded correct on the 16ohm tap.
1 reason for choosing the MQ-88uC was the volume control on the front just as I'd had with the A-75, but to a pleasent suprise it perfect volume was max hence it was switched from variable to direct.

Now the speakers, all 4 of them, are providing me with clean, powerful, and sublime dynamics I've never heard before.
The powerful class A controlled bass paired with the Class A tube horn is absolutely astounding.
The treble is just as it should be, even when turned up loud. It's pleasent, not hurtful in any way.

I've tried uploading some pictures of the journey as it took place and realisations were made.

I will be satisfied for a while now.
 

Attachments

  • 20231213_155124.jpg
    20231213_155124.jpg
    57.3 KB · Views: 92
  • 20231218_184232.jpg
    20231218_184232.jpg
    74.3 KB · Views: 85
  • 20231224_234821.jpg
    20231224_234821.jpg
    53.7 KB · Views: 72
  • 20231224_234827.jpg
    20231224_234827.jpg
    60.3 KB · Views: 70
  • 20231227_161022.jpg
    20231227_161022.jpg
    64.5 KB · Views: 83
Register to hide this ad
Great experiment, and thanks for posting your results!

I haven't spent enough time experimenting with my 4367s, but set them up fully intending to biamp with tubes on top. I just need to get the amps finished and hooked up, ... one of those "round-tuit" things. Thev've been here for well over a year so not much I can say as an excuse.

Greg Timbers talks about the synergy between tubes and horns (and his DD6700 Everest-derived speakers at home) and that there's something that hasn't been measured, but sounds better than SS on horns. Eventually I plan to do this with a pair of MC75s that are collecting dust.

I agree also that the 4367s are unforgivng, garbage-in / garbage-out, they are monitors and do exactly what you would expect from TOTL monitors: provide a very honest and accurate accoustic presentation of the electronic signal. Not for those who want "warm" nor artificial soundstage.

Do you feel that you would benefit from moving them apart a bit more or into the room / away from the walls and corners? Seems you would have tried that but with 300lb+ towers, not as easy as it might otherwise be! Many tend to claim that large speakers like these need more space to "open up". Also wondering if you've been able to enjoy the dynamics that they can provide, I know that there's something amazing about seeing the meters above 50w, and by a couple-hundred watts peak you feel that you're front and center at a concert, ... something that few other speakers I've owned can even approach in dynamics. With a stacked quad that would pretty much be drywall damage though.

Are you currently running the subs in the photo? If so I'm curious if you've found that they add much, and where you would be crossing over?
 
I had thought about doing such back on the relative cheap around 1996 or so and buy 2 pair of the older 4430 Monitors.

The one local Guitar Center that I dealt with often, called JBL direct right then. They said they had 5 left, something like 3 lefts, and 2 rights.

List price was I believe $2100/ea., they quoted me $1600/ea. out the door.

But now owning a pair of 4430's, I can imagine that their newer brother, and 4 of them combined, man!

The 4, without any subs could fill a very large room indeed. And as you know, the 4367 doesn't have a problem with the big Amps.

As they sang, "You know what I'm talkin about!" LOL

 
Last edited:
Great experiment, and thanks for posting your results!

I haven't spent enough time experimenting with my 4367s, but set them up fully intending to biamp with tubes on top. I just need to get the amps finished and hooked up, ... one of those "round-tuit" things. Thev've been here for well over a year so not much I can say as an excuse.

Greg Timbers talks about the synergy between tubes and horns (and his DD6700 Everest-derived speakers at home) and that there's something that hasn't been measured, but sounds better than SS on horns. Eventually I plan to do this with a pair of MC75s that are collecting dust.

I agree also that the 4367s are unforgivng, garbage-in / garbage-out, they are monitors and do exactly what you would expect from TOTL monitors: provide a very honest and accurate accoustic presentation of the electronic signal. Not for those who want "warm" nor artificial soundstage.

Do you feel that you would benefit from moving them apart a bit more or into the room / away from the walls and corners? Seems you would have tried that but with 300lb+ towers, not as easy as it might otherwise be! Many tend to claim that large speakers like these need more space to "open up". Also wondering if you've been able to enjoy the dynamics that they can provide, I know that there's something amazing about seeing the meters above 50w, and by a couple-hundred watts peak you feel that you're front and center at a concert, ... something that few other speakers I've owned can even approach in dynamics. With a stacked quad that would pretty much be drywall damage though.

Are you currently running the subs in the photo? If so I'm curious if you've found that they add much, and where you would be crossing over?
As some point I'd like shift the system 90 degrees to the right, that way I'd have more distance inbetween the speakers as the wall is wider.
But moving just about anything now seems a like daunting task.
As they stand right now I'm extremely happy with them, but there's always room for experimenting.

The subs have been retired, I don't feel the add much placed where they were. And there's no other place for them anyway right now.
Even so, I don't feel they integrate well with the woofer in the 4367.

If, when, I shift the system 90 degrees I've thought about acquiring 2 Rythmik F18 subs.
I trust they'd take care of the low low end and thus have a full range system.
 
NavnFugl,
I only just found this thread today. As a fellow 4367 owner, I might not be seeing the full potential of your setup, but have some questions about it.
To further discussion, here is my chain.

Mac Mini DSD -> Holo May DAC -> Luxman C900u preamp -> xlr output into 4 x AHB2 in monobloc setting -> each elements of 4367
4367 itself has padding setting in front, I use -0.5 HF, and -1 UHF.
Will be adding DIRAC minidsp studio for room correction and DSP (and I guess no longer convert to DSD)

This is the setup I came up with after testing many preamp, and amps including tube amp, pass lab x350.8, JC1.
It absolutely is unbelievable and can deliver astonishing high SPL with clarity and force I can't even find in mid 5 figure systems in audio shows.

The AHB2 has lowest distortion ever tested in any benchtest, its comparable to the testing equipments stereophile or other reviewers have at 13Xdb THD.
480w at 6ohm, but thats not the main point, more importantly, 29Amp peak, with 2 on each side its 58amp, there is so much headroom, I cannot see the ceiling.
Another unintending discovery; due to the fact that AHB2 has low gain setting at 9db, I can crank whatever class A/tube preamp to max, and it deliver the preamp sound mainly. Every preamp I slot in, I get a new system basically. I can slot in a high class tube preamp, the whole system is warm like a hot chocolate on xmas morning. in the end, I got the luxman for its true textured warm to neutral sound.


My question for your setup

1. The 4367 is fully capable to output unmatched SPL, one review it tested at 100db resulting 0.389017% measured distortion. You can literally go deaf at 12Xdb+ before start noticing distortion. So Why need 2 pairs?

2. I'm just going to say mcintosh room correction is not the most advance, DIRAC and other professional solution is light years ahead, with full automated testing and dsp in digital domain.

3. You shouldn't need any crossover ever in your chain, because simply 4367 already designed with that inside. If you want more SPL/power, give it more juice. If you actually want to do active setup, buy the M2 might as well?

Brightness you mentioned can be caused by many things (people prefer Harmon Kardon type curve, the 0.01% distortion in your upstream....), but many can attest (including people that do system setup for a living), if there are super low distortion in your chain, system can deliver ultra clarity/realism without brightness. There are 500k system with all SS gears, they are not bright. I love SET amp and tube gears myself, I know what they are capable of in vocal realism and such. But in 4367 case, its not ideal, because it LOVE current. I started with a single AHB2, and it delivered better midbass than my pass x350.8, it was ridicous I felt with the price difference. So I got another, and then another pair just for experiment. from 2 -> 4, the difference is still atonishing.

I can only give you an analogy of say a motorcycle engine; most supersport bike engine redline at 14-15k rpm. If rider doesn't know and is riding like a moped at 5-6k or even 7-8k, it felt ok, but not great, and will never experience its true capability. It'd only comes alive at 10k+. Right now you are using 2 engine at 6k rpm.

DO NOT TRUST sensitivity. It's a hard measurement of 1watt at 1 meter with 1k monotone. It has nothing to do with what the compression driver capable of.
If you wish, get a newish Chinese Dac with ultra low distortion, get a capable preamp with dual XLR output (like a holo serene), and 4 x AHB2, and try the monobloc bi-amp to singel pair of 4367. It'd cost less than your current setup, but will guarantee deliver better result. If you don't like the AHB2, there are plenty of ppl will take them off your hand.

I had communication with a user using the TAD top of the line CR series speakers, he is using the same setup after testing all the 5 figures amps, and came to the same conclusion.
 
NavnFugl,
I only just found this thread today. As a fellow 4367 owner, I might not be seeing the full potential of your setup, but have some questions about it.
To further discussion, here is my chain.

Mac Mini DSD -> Holo May DAC -> Luxman C900u preamp -> xlr output into 4 x AHB2 in monobloc setting -> each elements of 4367
4367 itself has padding setting in front, I use -0.5 HF, and -1 UHF.
Will be adding DIRAC minidsp studio for room correction and DSP (and I guess no longer convert to DSD)

This is the setup I came up with after testing many preamp, and amps including tube amp, pass lab x350.8, JC1.
It absolutely is unbelievable and can deliver astonishing high SPL with clarity and force I can't even find in mid 5 figure systems in audio shows.

The AHB2 has lowest distortion ever tested in any benchtest, its comparable to the testing equipments stereophile or other reviewers have at 13Xdb THD.
480w at 6ohm, but thats not the main point, more importantly, 29Amp peak, with 2 on each side its 58amp, there is so much headroom, I cannot see the ceiling.
Another unintending discovery; due to the fact that AHB2 has low gain setting at 9db, I can crank whatever class A/tube preamp to max, and it deliver the preamp sound mainly. Every preamp I slot in, I get a new system basically. I can slot in a high class tube preamp, the whole system is warm like a hot chocolate on xmas morning. in the end, I got the luxman for its true textured warm to neutral sound.


My question for your setup

1. The 4367 is fully capable to output unmatched SPL, one review it tested at 100db resulting 0.389017% measured distortion. You can literally go deaf at 12Xdb+ before start noticing distortion. So Why need 2 pairs?

2. I'm just going to say mcintosh room correction is not the most advance, DIRAC and other professional solution is light years ahead, with full automated testing and dsp in digital domain.

3. You shouldn't need any crossover ever in your chain, because simply 4367 already designed with that inside. If you want more SPL/power, give it more juice. If you actually want to do active setup, buy the M2 might as well?

Brightness you mentioned can be caused by many things (people prefer Harmon Kardon type curve, the 0.01% distortion in your upstream....), but many can attest (including people that do system setup for a living), if there are super low distortion in your chain, system can deliver ultra clarity/realism without brightness. There are 500k system with all SS gears, they are not bright. I love SET amp and tube gears myself, I know what they are capable of in vocal realism and such. But in 4367 case, its not ideal, because it LOVE current. I started with a single AHB2, and it delivered better midbass than my pass x350.8, it was ridicous I felt with the price difference. So I got another, and then another pair just for experiment. from 2 -> 4, the difference is still atonishing.

I can only give you an analogy of say a motorcycle engine; most supersport bike engine redline at 14-15k rpm. If rider doesn't know and is riding like a moped at 5-6k or even 7-8k, it felt ok, but not great, and will never experience its true capability. It'd only comes alive at 10k+. Right now you are using 2 engine at 6k rpm.

DO NOT TRUST sensitivity. It's a hard measurement of 1watt at 1 meter with 1k monotone. It has nothing to do with what the compression driver capable of.
If you wish, get a newish Chinese Dac with ultra low distortion, get a capable preamp with dual XLR output (like a holo serene), and 4 x AHB2, and try the monobloc bi-amp to singel pair of 4367. It'd cost less than your current setup, but will guarantee deliver better result. If you don't like the AHB2, there are plenty of ppl will take them off your hand.

I had communication with a user using the TAD top of the line CR series speakers, he is using the same setup after testing all the 5 figures amps, and came to the same conclusion.
Hi btbluesky,
Thanks for reading my thread.


1. The reason for 2 pairs of 4367 was never in search of more SPL. Mostly I just wanted to experiment with it. I enjoy the "wall of sound" that the array 1400 was giving me.
I attribute that, but I'm neither sure nor know for a fact, to the vertical horn whereas the 4367 has a more horizontal horn. The setup did what I wanted it to do, a "wall of sound" like the array 1400, but with all the added benefits of the 4367.

2. I always knew the MEN220 was a weak link when price was accounted for. It always bugged me, that signal was converted from analog to digital and then back again, and thus I relied on the MEN220's internal DAC for the final conversion.

3. That's true, combining an active crossover and the passive one in the speaker wasn't optimal.



Since then I've acquired the latest DSP from Deqx, the Pre-8. I knew I wanted to try and go fully active with no internal crossovers, whilst using the latest DSP technology.
I don't believe I would improve the 4367 by taking their crossovers out, so instead I looked for another speaker to take their place.
I landed on a pair of newly built replica 4345, they've have been made with no internal crossovers, designed to be driven by an active crossover like the Pre-8.
The 4345 is a 4 way speaker, perfect for the 4 way active crossover in the Pre-8. I always wanted to try JBL's big blue monitors from the 70's and 80's, so this was just a perfect opportunity.

One of my favourtte features of the Pre-8, is that it gives you 4 stereo digital outputs, so I can run my own DACs after it's done doing it's DSP shenanigans.
I intend to use my main DAC as the source feeding into the Pre-8s analog inputs, then feed the digital signal from the Pre-8 into 4(!) lesser DACs, but of the same sonic characteristics as the main DAC. From my experience, the first digital to analog conversion is the most important in the chain, I think last converstion step after the DSP is important too but I don't have the funds to just buy 4 more unit of my main DAC.
It's a long journey with the Pre-8, the software is still in beta and can be funky, but it can only get better and since it's already great as of now, that is very exciting to think about.

Main DAC: Aqua La Scala Mk2 (Looking to sell this and aquire a HoloAudio May DAC such as yourself)
Lesser DAC: I intend for it to be the HoloAudio Cyan 2

It's a pity that, as of now, we won't truly hear DSD files in combination with DSP since they convert it to PCM. Maybe one day that'll change.



The crazy setup with 2 sets of 4367 lasted me about a year, before the urge bit me again, but it was a damn good time.
The new setup is probably still crazy to most people, I guess I just don't adhear to the ordinary.

I still have 1 pair of 4367. They're for sale, as are the array 1400, but if possible I'd like to keep them both in a collection sort of way.



All 3 speakers excel in their own way, right now I'm enjoying the 4345.


/NavnFugl
 
Out of those 3, 4367 is the best by a mile and half.
Outside Everest 4inch beryllium compression driver, 4367's 3" driver is the best compression driver they can make.

Not sure if you have try with the right amplifier to the compression driver. Maybe just try pair of those new class D ones for fun ( u can get 10 amplifier for the price of the DEQX pre). I would love to try the GAN ones that's making wave. But they are only slightly more powerful than AHB2, but similar THD, I'll wait.

But the point is, don't cross it out thinking you know the sound until you give it all the juice u can throw at it. I don't know if it's the fact that it got 2 diaphragms or something, it changes alot w higher amperage, everything got alot bigger, way more "air", maybe the power is then matching the speed of the driver itself.

I have wall of sound w my 4367, albeit only at sweet spot, but it's there. I got sound from behind even (some Madonna stuff, prob sound engineer mixed in out of phrase sound for effect)....
 
Out of those 3, 4367 is the best by a mile and half.
Outside Everest 4inch beryllium compression driver, 4367's 3" driver is the best compression driver they can make.

Not sure if you have try with the right amplifier to the compression driver. Maybe just try pair of those new class D ones for fun ( u can get 10 amplifier for the price of the DEQX pre). I would love to try the GAN ones that's making wave. But they are only slightly more powerful than AHB2, but similar THD, I'll wait.

But the point is, don't cross it out thinking you know the sound until you give it all the juice u can throw at it. I don't know if it's the fact that it got 2 diaphragms or something, it changes alot w higher amperage, everything got alot bigger, way more "air", maybe the power is then matching the speed of the driver itself.

I have wall of sound w my 4367, albeit only at sweet spot, but it's there. I got sound from behind even (some Madonna stuff, prob sound engineer mixed in out of phrase sound for effect)....
I agree about the compression driver, it's clearly a very capable unit. I doubt it wasn't satisfied with the A-75, though I don't know the amperage it delivers, even so it just sounded too harsh in my room.
The imaging especially has come a long way, in comparison to the imaging the 4345 delivers.

However, In my room, the 15 inch in the 4367 doesn't compare to the 18 inch in the 4345. It's sensational, there's absolutely no need for a subwoofer, except for some psytrance that I like to play at times.
The 15 inch is a much more refined driver, but it just doesn't go as low as I want it to, in my room.

But most importantly, I feel that my 4345 setup is more enjoyable to listen to, it's fun.

Perfect? For now. End of the road? No.
Someday I will get a set of Everest DD67000, hopefully the Array 1400, 4367 and 4345 will still be here to say hello when that time comes.

/NavnFugl
 
That is sort of d'appolito config, because higher freq the dispersion is more concentrated, so grouping them together *might* work.

The reason why array 1400 has vertical 3" horn mouth was because in a home theater setup, with multiple rows, the vertical sweet spot vary depends on row the person sit, so it require large vertical dispersion range so everyone can have a piece of sweet spot.

In an actual living room setup, a horizontal horn mouth is ideal because its just 1 row of sofa, with everyone sitting on similar vertical height, but very diff position.

An accuphase A75, even in bi-amp, giving 60w at 8ohm , 120w 4ohm, is absolute not enough for 4367's D2430K driver. Below is the graph from Erin's audio corner, notice the ohm is around 6ohm at 1k, but going all the way to 9ohm 3k+. Forget about the current, A75 can only give out less than 60w at these critical region, in bi-amp.

I'm running 380-480w in those region, and feel like it can take more.
JBL recommend 300w, but we all know clean watt never damage driver, so 600w+ is no a problem.

Not all driver changes their behaviors like this, those slow ass dome tweeters are ok w whatever watt u give them. not compression drivers.



1736967849393.png
 
I'm not sure what's going on here now? LOL The Amps currently in use are Accuphase A75?

I fed my 4430's with a pair of Bryston 7BSST2's. LOL Oh yeah, you'll notice those 2235H working quite nicely! LOL

I know lots of these speakers can really overwhelm you with mids and highs. About the only layman's terms I can give is is go lightly on the mids-highs if you can.

As Samuel Jackson might say, "Tone that **** down!" LOL

Both the 4430, and other 4300 series speakers did have more than enough muscle at 100db plus to make you a deaf man in short time, especially in an average sized room, they are quite a handful.

And yeah, I'll take 2 pair too! Walnut! Maybe I'll go Quad again! I got the **** jack!

Relegate my 4430's to a "bedroom system" LOL
 

Attachments

  • DSCN0562.JPG
    DSCN0562.JPG
    89.4 KB · Views: 18
Lots of sayings, in many worlds and in many tongues. The first watt, there's never too much power, voicing, damping factors, various amp designs, synergy, room acoustics, treatments, placement on and on.

Yeah, amazing how placement is a huge factor and changes any speaker's sound dependent.

Let's take a pair of Martin Logans, or Maggies. Would you park these right against a back wall? I know, I'm blathering.


:)
 
A test toon for the system. If it can't pass muster here with the 4367, you need some swaps of gear. LOL

I seen them play this live. Carl started with a drum intro for about 8-10 seconds, not like this chopped vid shows.

 
Received a text from a friend yesterday about entering a new level in his audio journey. He had for the first time bi-amped his 4367s with tube mono blocks for horns and Yamaha SS Amp on the woofers.

I am in turn thinking of setting up my 4430s in similar fashion using my tube mono blocks and Ashley SS Amp in the future.
 
Received a text from a friend yesterday about entering a new level in his audio journey. He had for the first time bi-amped his 4367s with tube mono blocks for horns and Yamaha SS Amp on the woofers.

I am in turn thinking of setting up my 4430s in similar fashion using my tube mono blocks and Ashley SS Amp in the future.

Ya, bet it'd sound amazing. Have you done any other mods to the 4430?
 
I have not modded them, they are actually due for new surrounds and are out of the rotation until then.
 
What mods would you suggest and what are the benefits?
My understanding is that the best mod you can make on these is to rewire them to by-pass the internal/external crossover option getting the rotary switch out of the circuit.

I had a pair, but didn't cotton to the titanium tweeters and sold them for a grand with new surrounds installed by Speaker Repair Pros.
 
Back
Top Bottom