Do you think it will sound better than a recent model three way Klipschorn?
If it comes with DSP (or is a $3500 option), its two horns would be time-aligned. That’s a plus—and an option with the current Klipschorn. But then they’d require the added cost of biamping.
If Klipsch actually produced a top horn that can sufficiently cover that wide range currently covered by the Klipschorn’s mid and tweeter—similar to the Jubilee horn—power to them (but doubtful). And, if so, why go back to the three-way configuration—which would be rendered obsolete? It’s also got a sealed back—which supposedly means it doesn’t need to be sealed to the corners, and allows for optional placement.
In my auditions of sealed-back Klipschorns—placed out away from corners into the room—I’ve always felt the bass was constricted/lacking. (Others haven’t.) So, I guess someone will have to compare them and report back.
In terms of their aesthetics: They look bold and handsome enough, I guess. They seem clearly “complete” in their design stance. But I’m not a fan of the brass(?) inlay. Too Art Deco and ornamental for me. (But, overall, it works.)
However, I’d prefer an enclosed top—as in the traditional finished Klipschorn—which feels less unfinished/industrial and more like living room furniture—and would be easier to clean and provide a place for tchotchkes. (Where are people going to put their leaky potted plants?) To me, there’s something too contemporary-industrial-fad-feeling in the currently fashionable OJAS-naked/pro-horn-on-top look. I think, aesthetically, this design has a shorter shelf life. But I’ve also never really been a fan of enormous, ostentatious blowers sticking out of car hoods, either.
Still, I’d happily live with a pair of Jubilees.