• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

A 6AS7-based pre-amp with tone controls

thorpej

AK Subscriber
Subscriber
A couple of years ago, @kward started this thread:


In response to that thread, I ran a couple of experiments with a 6080 that showed some promise, and then promptly put the idea at the tail of the queue.

Fast-forward to a few weeks ago when the Hafler DH-110 I use in my $DayJob office went on the blink. I had a business trip coming up that involved two 14 hour flights and a bunch of basically free evenings -- i.e. time on my hands. I wasn't going to be able to debug my DH-110 during this time, so I decided to bump the low-gain pre-amp idea to the front of the queue.

After several iterations, here is what I've come up with. (See attached PDF that contains 3 schematic sheets.)

The circuit consists of 3 basic functional blocks: An input buffer, an active tone stack, and a gain/output stage. The circuit includes a switch that will bypass the tone stack, connecting the output if the input buffer directly to the input of the gain/output stage.

The input buffer exists primarily to isolate the input source from the tone stack. It is a basic MOSFET source-follower using a ZVN0545A. The MOSFET is biased at +125V using voltage divider from the +250V rail.

The tone stack consists of a standard 12AX7 inverting gain stage with a negative feedback loop consisting of a Baxandall network. This circuit was adapted from Max Robinson's "Practical Tone Controls" page. The tone stack has roughly unity gain; with the controls set to the flattest response, simulation shows the gain to be approximately -0.35dB. The output of the tone stack is buffered with a direct-coupled ZVN0545A MOSFET source-follower to isolate it from the volume control.

The gain/output stage is a 6AS7 / 6080 power triode loaded with an IXYS 10M45S constant-current source. The output stage is fed by a +160V rail, and the CCS is set for 40mA. This runs the 6AS7 at a very conservative operating point. These are the same conditions I originally ran my experiments with.

The power supply is built around an AnTek AS-05T120 120Vac @ 200mA toroidal power transformer. This transformer also has 2 6.3Vac @ 2A windings, which are paralleled to supply the required 2.8A of heater current. The power supply is rectified using a full-wave voltage doubler. The +160V rail is tapped at the junction of the two capacitors in the doubler and filtered using a CLCLC network employing two Triode C354 (Dynaco ST-70 replacement) filter chokes. The +320V output of the doubler is filtered and brought down to the desired +250V using a CRCRC network.

I originally considered using DC heaters, but after studying Pete Millett's low-mu pre-amp (which allows 6AS7s as one of the tube options) I decided to go with AC heaters biased to +55V. This is taken off the +160V rail with a voltage divider. A 4-turn trim pot is included to zero-out the ripple at the virtual center tap of the heater winding, and a test point is provided on the PSU board for easy scoping when making this adjustment.

The pre-amp circuit, except for the tube stages, is laid out on a ~6.5" x 2.75" PCB. Connections for the tone control pots are provided by pin headers in the middle of the board. Other connections are made with screw terminals at either end.

PreAmp_PCB_layout.png
PreAmp_PCB_3d_front.png
PreAmp_PCB_3d_back.png

The power supply board measures ~3.75" x 3.25". Because the 6AS7 is run from a +160V rail, the capacitors are physically pretty small.

PreAmp_PSU_layout.png
PreAmp_PSU_3d_front_1.png
PreAmp_PSU_3d_front_2.png
PreAmp_PSU_3d_back.png

(Please excuse the visual hiccups on the PCB back-side renderings ... I had to create some new footprints in KiCad for some of the capacitors, based on other footprints in KiCad's standard footprint library, and I neglected to update the 3D models.)

The CCS for both channels are located on a separate generic board I made for this purpose. The details of that board's circuit are not detailed on this schematic -- I build up some boards for that as a separate generic component.

CCS_Load_x2_layout.png

I should be receiving the pre-amp circuit and PSU PCBs from the fabricator on Monday, and I intend to document the build in this thread. At the end of the process, I'll be making all of the design files available, including Gerbers suitable for sending to your favorite PCB fabricator.

In a follow-up post later today, I'll be sharing some of the simulation data for the pre-amp circuit.
 

Attachments

Register to hide this ad
Ok, some simulation results. Here is the schematic of the LTSpice simulation (the .asc file will be made available with all of the other design files).

PreAmp_Sim_Schematic.png

In the schematic, the tone controls are set for the flattest response. As you can see, dead-center of the 250K bass pot isn't quite "flat"; it needs to be nudged a teensy bit in the "boost" direction. Anyway, note the net labeled "In". This is the signal fed into the input buffer, immediately after being AC-coupled from the source:

PreAm_Sim_input_response.png

There is the slightest bit of roll-off at the bottom end, but nothing to be particularly concerned about. Given that, here is the response curve with the tone controls set to the flattest response:

PreAmp_Sim_response_flat.png

These are the response curves for max-bass (boost) and min-bass (cut):

PreAmp_Sim_response_max_bass.png
PreAmp_Sim_response_min_bass.png

These are the response curves for max-treble (boost) and min-treble (cut):

PreAmp_Sim_response_max_treb.png
PreAmp_Sim_response_min_treb.png

Here is the response curve for both set to max boost:

PreAmp_Sim_response_max_bass_max_treb.png

As you can see, the bass boost is much more than the treble boost, but this isn't an issue, because human hearing is much more sensitive to volume changes in the higher frequencies. (Also, my intended usage is to give a little more bass "oomph" to the Klipsch bookshelf speakers in my office.)
 
Oops, forgot: response with tone controls bypassed (you have to change a couple of wires in the simulation for this):

PreAmp_Sim_response_tone_bypassed.png
 
Not much to add to the impressive design work, however and against better judgement,,, I built a 6AS7G PP amp a while ago... Other than the hefty (2.5A) heater current, these regulator triodes really sound good... It's one of the best sounding amps I've built!!! Carry on,, waiting to see your completed pre amp...
 
Oops! I just noticed that the LTSpice simulation has some left-overs from before I finalized the PSU. Specifically, it has the input buffer and tone controls on a +300V rail, rather than a +250V rail. I've corrected the simulation by updating the V1 and V3 voltage sources and adjusting the R4, R17, and R19 biasing resistors. Those are the only changes to the simulation. It doesn't really have any impact on the simulation results; the main difference is that the MOSFETs drop less voltage, and thus dissipate a bit less heat.
 
Boards have arrived! Dollar bill for size reference. Hopefully I can scrounge up some time to build them up this week.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3318.jpg
    IMG_3318.jpg
    63.4 KB · Views: 32
Built up the power supply and input buffer / tone control PCBs. Both perform more or less as expected (for what I've been able to test so far). The only thing that ended up differently from simulation is the voltage divider that biases the input buffer -- that ended up at +80V rather than at +125V. I'm a little confused about that one. Both of the 10M resistors were within 2% of nominal. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Only practical repercussion from that is that the input buffer MOSFETs dissipate a little more than anticipated, but they're still within their ratings.

Anyway, I have to wait for the 250K 2-gang linear pots to arrive before I can finish the tone controls. And once those are set up and connected, I can test the entire tone control circuit.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_5847.jpg
    IMG_5847.jpg
    97.1 KB · Views: 26
  • IMG_7238.jpg
    IMG_7238.jpg
    72.9 KB · Views: 25
  • IMG_6173.JPG
    IMG_6173.JPG
    53.8 KB · Views: 26
You mean R102 and R103?

upload_2019-10-6_20-25-5.png

I bet the meter you are using to measure that 80V has a 10M input resistance, so the resistance across R103 will "look" like 5M, which will then read about 80V on your meter. But it really means 125V in this case.
 
Last edited:
You mean R102 and R103?

View attachment 1637826

I bet the meter you are using to measure that 80V has a 10M input resistance, so the resistance across R103 will "look" like 3.3M, which will then read about 80V on your meter. But it really means 125V in this case.

Hah! By golly, you are right. I measured with my Keithley 2015, and I believe it does have a 10M input impedance. I have a 1G ohm probe that I can use with my Fluke meter to take another reading (it doesn't work with the Keithley for some reason). I'll do that this week and report results.
 
FINALLY following up (oof, it was a busy 2 months). Measured with my 1G ohm probe... the +250V input measured 2.8V, and the junction of R102 and R103 measured 1.4V, so the measurement error with the 10M ohm probe is confirmed.

Anyway, I had planned to post some measurements of the actual circuit today... I was waiting for the 250K 2-gang linear pots I ordered to arrive, and when they did I was too busy with other stuff to work on it... and now with a week off for Thanksgiving, I notice that, despite Mouser listing the part as linear taper, the parts I received are actually MN taper pots used for guitar blend-balance controls... so totally useless for this application. So, I'm stuck waiting for parts from AES... hopefully they'll arrive before my vacation vaporizes.
 
Well, I decided I didn't want to wait for the pots to arrive... so I breadboarded a pair of 125K+125K voltage dividers to simulate the pots set at center and did a network analysis. Modulo the garbage caused by ambient noise pickup (60Hz plus harmonics), at least flat-response works as expected. The noise is being picked up because there's no shielding around ANYTHING at the moment... it's all just sitting out on the bench with flying leads, um, flying everywhere. I did have to power the 6N2P heaters with DC to get it even down to this level, so I may have to reevaluate my decision to use AC heaters.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2019-11-24 at 1.46.07 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2019-11-24 at 1.46.07 PM.png
    153.8 KB · Views: 14
Back
Top Bottom