This was a reasonable effort, though as
@KeithD pointed out, is glosses over a lot of things (obviously due to time constraints) and has a couple of details a bit off. It seems to almost conflate the Definition Series with the AU-D33 and 101, for one thing, and kind of muddles the chronological order of when those models were released. Still a fairly decent summary, but I'll also just say up front that I'm not a big fan of AI generated voiceovers, and much of the voiceover "script" being read from also seems heavily AI generated.
Presently, there is a lot of this type of content being churned out on YouTube, and the AI generated scripts and voiceovers all have a certain odd quality about them that makes listening to such videos tiresome in short order, at least to me.
This leads me to my chief complaint with "AI" as presently constituted. It scours places like AK, takes the content of the posts it finds here (whether correct or not, incidentally).and amalgamates it into articles it presents as accurate, by more or less stealing away the efforts of others who posted such information to begin with. Then content creators (or AI's directly in some cases) go on to make videos built off what was basically plagiarized information, photos and video gleaned from all over the internet, in the hopes of monetizing their newly "created" content built mostly on the efforts of others. The entire process is sketchy, and I wonder if it will ever be widely recognized as such.
This is even more of an issue for online content that is legitimately under copyright, and yet is freely peeled off and incorporated into the "AI" knowledge base. I guess there's no putting that horse back in the barn now, but the essence of this is that individuals and companies are seeking to profit from content created by stealing the efforts of others, whether such was originally given freely or not. Further, because the "AI" combs everything it can find, and incorporates it all (inaccuracies included) the quality of the information it can present is frequently dubious, and yet virtually no one wants to put in the effort to verify anything, they simply trust what the "AI" presents at face value.
I'd add that I'm not singling out the video posted in this thread by any means, this is a general trend that is inescapable now. This thread just presented an opportunity for me to comment on it.