soundmotor
super modified
LBPete said:I’m basing it on some research I did a few years ago. I bough my L-780s on ebay. The glue that was supposed to hold the butyl surrounds down to the basket, had corroded the lip of the steel baskets to the point the surrounds separated from the baskets. (Almost all the L-780IIs or L-590IIs I see on Ebay have some degree of the corrosion.)
Looking for information, I found that the woofers on the series I were 206-0324 and the series II have 206-0355. I haven’t seen the 0324s myself but I was under the impression they have cast baskets while the 0355s have stamped steel baskets. I also don’t think the 0324 are likely to get the glue corrosion that are the curse of the 0355s. As far as the sound quality goes, I haven’t heard the series I but I like my series IIs but they don’t sound as good as my L880s.
- Pete
The corrosion issue is odd and I don't have a conclusive answer as to why nearly all of the later ones can have it to some degree. When I say later, it is nearly all pincushion style steel basket speakers, not just the ones in the 780. The last generation round steel baskets don't seem to do this. I've seen it on early vintage ones too, but not with any prevalence. I suspect that the glue formulation was changed somewhere along the way. I've never seen the surrounds lifting on the cast basket models although, glue can certainly break down and be improperly applied.
All 780's used stamped steel baskets. The early versions did not use cast. When you moved up in the line to the 880 series & towers, you got cast ones. I don't believe that 206-0324 is the correct part number. Pretty sure that number was for the 10" used in the PB1500 subwoofer cabinet. 206-0354 rings a bell but that is a shot in the dark.
The major changes across the board from Series I to Series II was the protection scheme in the crossover, from fuses to polyswitches. Sometimes some minor tweaking in the crossover values too. When ADS changed the part number of a woofer that was virtually identical to its predecessor, it usually signified a cosmetic or production process change to a functionally identical part. Easiest to see that on was the tweeters & mids. Sometimes there were drive system improvements such as changing the voice-coil former to Kapton from aluminum. That gave them better durability in an abuse or overdrive situation.
Lastly, polyswitches are a mixed bag. Many hate what they do to the "sound". You can make the argument that anything will sound better with fewer parts in series with the drive units. Perhaps some of your concerns on sound quality relate to that?
Last edited:
