One word of caution with the CX2310 and with any active - never engage the x10 button when it's on and connected. If you do, all hell will break loose.
Hi PG! I believe you. Thankfully, they've put
that button at the back!
There's another thing though that has me thinking. I've read that the sub (low pass) crossover does not affect the signal to the "Low" driver. So, in my case, if I run my woofs off the sub, I can limit the frequency fed to them (up to 235 Hz), but it
won't limit the lows going to my Richard Allan CG10Ts (except for a 25Hz rumble filter). The info says they're good down to 40Hz, but I worry if I don't save them from some real LF, it will mess with their high range output (not to mention over excursion). I'm basically running them like wide range mids (with natural roll off at the top).
So it seems I've got 2 options:
1. I can run the woofs off the (mono) sub, and put a cap on the CG10Ts, for a HPF at maybe at 2-300(?) That way, I'll have active crossover between the mids and tweets, and separate gain control on all 3 speakers. OR
2. I can ignore the (mono) sub and run the woofs off the "low output", and
both the CG10Ts and the Super 3 tweets off the "high output". In that case, I may still need an Lpad to attenuate the CG10Ts (cuz right now they overwhelm the other two). (I'm not attenuating the tweet at all right now.) Maybe without the choke on the woofs, this will be less of a problem. Even without the Lpad though, if I'm running the tweets together with the CG10Ts, I think I'll still need a (small) cap for them.
Either way, I'll have somewhat of a hybrid. I'm not complaining. It will be interesting to experiment.
If I don't need to attenuate the CG10Ts, I think I prefer the second option, cuz then I only need one little cap, will have more flexibility with the crossover from the woofs (and I have stereo bass). Any thoughts? :scratch2:
Still have to get interconnects....