You could take the Tidal test and see if you hear the difference. http://test.tidalhifi.com/
I got 2 out of 5 correct.
You could take the Tidal test and see if you hear the difference.
When I compare 320 to a cd spinning in my cd player there is a clear difference.
When I compare 320 to wav or hi-rez files there is a clear difference.
When I compare 320 to low bit-rate mp3 there is a clear difference.
When I compare 320 to Tidal's HIFI there is not a clear difference....it is minimal most of the time. It has been stated that not all of Tidal's music is lossless, even if the HIFI logo is lit up. I would really have to believe this is true.
Not looking for the latest releases here, most of my music is more vintage
And this is 'the' key parameter to consider bitrate hype wise with streaming services. To me the entire point of using an on-demand subscription streaming service is to have "your music" anywhere & anywhen you want it. Given the varied environments, noise floor, and sub systems I consume my "cloud collection", the nascent lossless/flac offerings just don't justify the premium.Thank you. Yes, I have been thinking about Tidal. I do want to hear some other comments about Spotify, etc., and whether $20 lossless steaming is a better value than $9.99 for 320kbps. Pandora One, which sounds "OK", streams at 192kbps. Most of my listening is done at home with CDs, losslessly copied CDs or LPs. On the Harley, between the pipes and the wind, I cannot discern bit rate differences!
Out of the two, Deezer was the only one available on Sonos which is how I stream in my main system
Thanks, I'll have to check that out.Tidal is also available on Sonos now, look under Beta services. Deezer is half the price of Tidal, though.
The choices can appear daunting; but it's not like you're leasing a car.WOW! Tons of information, but I am still finding it difficult to make a choice. Please keep the personal experiences with these services coming. Thanks to all, and Happy New Year!