• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

Anti-skating vs. "lateral balance" on Sansui SR-2050

You misunderstand my point. If a lateral imbalance created a lateral torque, we wouldn't need antiskating mechanisms. But we have them, even on arms that have lateral balance adjustments because lateral imbalance doesn't create lateral torque.
 
What I don't get is how an imbalanced mass on one side of the pivot, which would place different forces on the two sides of the bearing, one downward and one upward (or, more likely, less downward) would create any force that would move the arm inward or outward. The imbalanced force is perpendicular to the motion that you suggest results, and this doesn't make sense.
If such an imbalance actually created either an inward or outward force, we wouldn't need any antiskating mechanisms since we could simply use that imbalance to serve that function.

The only thing that can happen, if the mass center is too far from a center line between stylus and pivot, is that one bearing theoretically has so small downforce, so there will be an upforce when the arm is accelerating upwards.

Skating force of course is another matter all together.
gusten
 
You misunderstand my point. If a lateral imbalance created a lateral torque, we wouldn't need antiskating mechanisms. But we have them, even on arms that have lateral balance adjustments because lateral imbalance doesn't create lateral torque.

Hi Nat, I think we're having a different view of what lateral imbalance is, and is not. I believe you are refering to a twisting of the arm due to more mass one side than another. One bearing has a load on the lower half of the bearing, and the other has a load on the upper half of the bearing? The maximum of that twist is set by the maximum clearance of the bearing(s). Except in such cases like the SME knife edge where one knife would be loaded much more than the other.

Forget the twisting part for a moment.

Lateral weight most certainly will cause a lateral force. When an arm is skating that is a lateral force towards the spindle. That is corrected by adding an opposite, but equal (we hope) lateral force to "pull" the arm outward.....in a lateral manner. Email me, and we'll go over some things before this thread turns into something it shouldn't.
 
I think the confusion comes from the use to the term 'lateral' in various different ways. The origin of the thread was about a problem with setting the location of the outrigger that provides lateral balance for arms that would not otherwise be putting equal force on both sides of the horizontal bearing. At least theoretically this seems to be desireable, though plenty of arms seem to do fine without, and the little arm and outrigger can introduce resonances, which may be more of a problem than the problem they are trying to solve. So some dispense with them.
What I was disagreeing with was the idea that seemed to be being put forth that the lateral balance outrigger actually creates an antiskating force (which is a lateral force, a torque on the arm) -- I don't see how this is possible since any imbalance or balance created by the outrigger would be vertical, whereas the torque is horizontal.
Marc -- I assume that what you mean by an antiskating counterweight is a weight on a string or pivot that creates an outward force. No disagreement there -- of course it creates a lateral force since its weight is set up to pull laterally. But a weight on a fixed rod outward from the arm doesn't do that, as far as I can tell.
 
Ok. What cartridges are best with this table?

Resurecrion of thread.
I have a tanton 500 and stanton 890 AL that I want to use. all will be ok provided I use protractor to set em up?
I just obtained hi fI news test lp, I hope it will help. Any help on belt replacements?
 
When I add the lateral balance weight onto my Sansui 2050C tonearm, the tonearm gets pulled outward (away from the center) no matter where I have the lateral balance OR the fishing line anti-skate set. I can't even put the tonearm over the record. Should I just put this lateral balance weight away?
 
Is your turntable mounted at an angle? With a level table, the lateral balance weight should not apply any side force to the arm. It's only when the arm or turntable are tilted that an unbalance should occur - tilting is how you determine where to set the weight.
 
I just checked with a level and the turntable is perfectly level.

But here's something: I opened up the bottom of the turntable to take a look at the inside and I saw another lateral balance weight inside:
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3542.jpeg
    IMG_3542.jpeg
    79.4 KB · Views: 29
I think that is some sort of inertia device rather than a lateral weight. But that is a hunch, not a fact. The point of the lateral weight is to equalize the down force on the vertical bearings and to ensure the arm is balanced in all three dimensions. The thing in the picture would do nothing for the first issue, obviously. So what is it for? Hmmm.
 
Well, it is a lateral weight, but it is actually attached to the bent metal cam part, which is pretty assymetrical, and could make the horizontal bearing more likely to bind.
 
Well, it is a lateral weight, but it is actually attached to the bent metal cam part, which is pretty assymetrical, and could make the horizontal bearing more likely to bind.

It just seems like there would be too much weight on that side of the tonearm if I add the second lateral weight on the outside.

As soon as I put that second weight on, I can't even cue the tonearm. It just pulls it all the way out.

Yet I see that lateral weight in all the old pics of the 2050C
 
Clearly there is a problem, but what it is is unclear. - Don't mess with the inside weight since it isn't meant to be adjustable. Post some pictures of your setup. That may help. I'm wondering if your antiskating is set up properly.
 
Wait - I suddenly realized that maybe that maybe what you mean by lateral weight is actually the antiskating weight. The lateral weight is the thing attached to the rod sticking out of the side of the arm. The antiskating weight is the little weight on filament. Its purpose is to make the arm want to move outward, so the behavior of your arm when you put it on makes sense.
 
I am missing the lateral weight on on my Sansui 2050C. Can anyone tell me how much it weighs in grams, so that I could fashion a suitable replacement?
 
I am missing the lateral weight on on my Sansui 2050C. Can anyone tell me how much it weighs in grams, so that I could fashion a suitable replacement?

Take a look at post #25 in this thread then follow along for the next few posts.
 
Take a look at post #25 in this thread then follow along for the next few posts.
I know many people seem to not use the lateral weight. I also see the specs for the anti-skate bias weight but not for the lateral weight. Another poster once mentioned that it is somewhere around 2.4g but that seems unlikely given the dimensions of the lateral weight compared to the anti-skate bias weight - the lateral weight seems like it would be a little heavier.
 
I'm sorry. I misread your post. I thought you were talking about the anti skate weight. My 2050C has gone to another home so I no longer have access to it or I'd measure the weight for you myself. Hopefully someone will chime in with the correct weight.
 
Given that they are positioned on an outrigger, often at an arbitrarily position, but when they are used correctly, they get moved in or out on the shaft til the arm balances when the table is tilted somewhat on it's side, the weight could probably vary a fair amount as long as it was moved in or out correctly.
 
Given that they are positioned on an outrigger, often at an arbitrarily position, but when they are used correctly, they get moved in or out on the shaft til the arm balances when the table is tilted somewhat on it's side, the weight could probably vary a fair amount as long as it was moved in or out correctly.


the adjustment for lateral weight is section 4-3

49947260066_5c3b897b82_b.jpg
 
Given that they are positioned on an outrigger, often at an arbitrarily position, but when they are used correctly, they get moved in or out on the shaft til the arm balances when the table is tilted somewhat on it's side, the weight could probably vary a fair amount as long as it was moved in or out correctly.

That’s a good point, I could probably use just about anything of the approximate weight.
 
Back
Top Bottom