Yup, I did actually ask that! 
Stumbled upon the Ford Pinto Club of America website. Don't even remember the last time I thought about one, let alone saw one. Well, turns out that their is a pretty enthusiastic group of Pinto supporters out there.
Anyone who was alive in the 70's remembers the exploding Pintos. Well, I found this interesting tidbit on Wikipedia:
"However, a 1991 law review paper by Gary Schwartz[9] argued that the case against the Pinto was less clear-cut than commonly supposed. Twenty-seven people died in Pinto fires. Given the Pinto's production figures (over 2 million built), this was no worse than typical for the time. Schwartz argued that the car was no more fire-prone than other cars of the time, that its fatality rates were lower than comparably sized imported automobiles, and that the supposed "smoking gun" document that plaintiffs claimed showed Ford's callousness in designing the Pinto was actually a document based on National Highway Traffic Safety Administration regulations about the value of a human life rather than a document containing an assessment of Ford's potential tort liability."
Not as bad looking as I remember either.....
Stumbled upon the Ford Pinto Club of America website. Don't even remember the last time I thought about one, let alone saw one. Well, turns out that their is a pretty enthusiastic group of Pinto supporters out there.
Anyone who was alive in the 70's remembers the exploding Pintos. Well, I found this interesting tidbit on Wikipedia:
"However, a 1991 law review paper by Gary Schwartz[9] argued that the case against the Pinto was less clear-cut than commonly supposed. Twenty-seven people died in Pinto fires. Given the Pinto's production figures (over 2 million built), this was no worse than typical for the time. Schwartz argued that the car was no more fire-prone than other cars of the time, that its fatality rates were lower than comparably sized imported automobiles, and that the supposed "smoking gun" document that plaintiffs claimed showed Ford's callousness in designing the Pinto was actually a document based on National Highway Traffic Safety Administration regulations about the value of a human life rather than a document containing an assessment of Ford's potential tort liability."
Not as bad looking as I remember either.....
