• Please note that Audiokarma will be offline briefly for updates early on Monday morning, September 28th.

Any impressions on the Parks Audio Puffin ?

I posted this on another forum, but since there's a thread here on this, I thought I'd include it here as well. No affiliation with Parks Audio at all.

*****************************

I've had my Puffin for a little over 24hrs and probably put 3-4 hours on it of active listening.

I'm using this in the tape loop as a sound enhancer, not as a phono stage.

First thing I wanted to test was whether the A->D and D-> process had an effect on the sound by itself, so I set it flat (Line In, 0db gain, no EQ effects active at all) so the DSP wasn't doing anything. I used a well recorded LP (Music Matters: Kenny Burrell, Midnight Blue). At first, I thought I detected a <5% loss of some air/dimension, but after trying to test myself and see whether I could tell whether it was in the loop or out (using the tape monitor button to bring it in or take it out), I couldn't reliably tell, so that tells me it's essentially transparent to me sonically at moderate volumes.

The feature I was really curious about was the new Magic click/pop suppressor. It works really well! I tried one LP that is likely just dirty and has a lot of small crackles during the lead-in and first part of the first track, a first pressing of Bill Evans Sunday at the Village Vanguard that has frequent clicks/pops of various size due to age, and a Monk LP that had some serious scratches across a couple of tracks.

For the light stuff, it takes it out almost entirely. For the heavier/severe stuff, it seems to take out some of it and what it doesn't take out, it suppresses in volume and harshness by 70-80+%. So you hear that it's there, but it's not bothersome. For an add-on feature not in the scope of the original feature set, it's actually really impressive.

I do feel that it has some small effect on the sound - like the processed result isn't quite as dynamic, with a slight veil/polishing of the edges. But if given the choice to hear a largely noise free slightly less dynamic version instead of a noisy/distracting more dynamic version, I'd choose the former for sure. For the really serious stuff, even though it doesn't take out everything, at some point you wonder whether you should play it anyway due to possible negative effects on your stylus. But if you're willing to play it, it will be much much more tolerable.

I also played with the Tilt and Air features for the purpose of livening up duller sounding records. The two I used were the Mofi SACD of the Pretenders S/T album, which has always been a disappointment to me. Very dead sounding at moderate volumes and seems like it's rolled off at the top. Not quite as bad, but also disappointing to me was the redbook CD of Norah Jones Day Breaks album. At first I used Tilt only at the +2 level, then played around with adding some additional high end with the Air set at +2.

It definitely livened both albums up and improved the sound. On Day Breaks, it went from vocals and percussion being buried in the mix to them being significantly more detailed and able to be appreciated for the subtleties in the performance.

My preamp is a Mac C35, which has a five-band EQ, as well as variable loudness. I like variable loudness a lot for adding some warmth/meat to thinner sounding recordings without having to tweak individual EQ bands. But you can't really go in the opposite direction with that and help dead recordings sound more lively. Using some combination of the higher frequency EQ knobs, I perhaps could have livened up the recordings similarly, but I'm not yet sure whether I could achieve the same result. Even if I could, it's easier to remember that a certain album requires a +2 Tilt to optimize vs remembering that I need to be at 2 o'clock on the 1500hz knob and 3 o'clock on the 10kHz knob.

I also have a couple of old CDs that have pre-emphasis, but the flags aren't in the typical places and I don't have a CD player that will detect and de-emphasize them properly, so they sound thin and tinny with over-emphasized high frequencies. I tried the custom EQ settings that Shannon Parks suggested and that definitely took away that effect. Likely because I'm used to hearing them so tinny/thin, the custom EQ actually made them sound a bit darker than I thought was ideal, but I backed off on the rolloff control and it didn't sound as dark.

**************************
So I have to say I'm really impressed with this and feel it's well worth the price. For my particular situation (the vast majority of my music collection is in really good condition and is mastered reasonably well), I'm not inclined to use it as a phono stage. I already have two good choices for phono stages and by using the Puffin as a phono stage, I would give up the ability to use it for CDs and streaming (without switching wires around, which I don't want to do on a regular basis).

At some point, to satisfy our curiosity, a friend and I may try to use the Puffin as a phono stage and compare it to the others we have. Between us, we have a few options (Clearaudio Nano, Graham Slee Reflex M, a couple of Jasmine models), but we still have to figure out whether we can create a test configuration that enables us to switch phono stages in real time vs having to take out one and install another. And wait for this virus thing to blow over.
 
For me; the Puffin would be a phono preamp, replacing a Rega Fono Mini. I really have no thoughts on using it for anything else.
All the things it is capable of have really drawn me in. The pop and click filtering, for one, would be nice!
A month ago I was focusing on a Sutherland Insight, and now I'm looking at the Puffin, and recently, the Lounge MKIII, both being less than half the cost of the Insight. Lol!
I suppose, I could look at it in such a way that the Puffin could possibly be a big improvement over what I have now with a bigger sound stage, and lower noise floor for starters. Over time, if I wanted more, I wouldn't be out that much selling it and moving on.
 
I posted this on another forum, but since there's a thread here on this, I thought I'd include it here as well. No affiliation with Parks Audio at all.

At some point, to satisfy our curiosity, a friend and I may try to use the Puffin as a phono stage and compare it to the others we have. Between us, we have a few options (Clearaudio Nano, Graham Slee Reflex M, a couple of Jasmine models), but we still have to figure out whether we can create a test configuration that enables us to switch phono stages in real time vs having to take out one and install another. And wait for this virus thing to blow over.

great review!! would like to hear your thoughts on the phono, compared to others, if you ever go through the hassle of changing RCAs ;D
 
Recently the factory installed/direct sales SPDIF Puffins have begun shipping with 24/96 output (the lights on my Benchmark DAC-3 confirm this). I've only had mine for less than two weeks -have so far put a mixed bag of LOMC and MM carts thru it (benefit of a SL-1210 with Technics/Stevenson alignment). Have only enabled Majic NR and have been switching between 40dB gain/47kOhm and 56 dB/200 ohm inputs -haven't tried any of the air or tilt functions ( this is based entirely on 50 years of prejudice against tone controls - no implication that this is in any way rational/defensible.).I use the pass thru function on the Benchmark DAC-3 to feed the 24/96 directly into the 24/96 SPDIF input of the Meridian DSP-5000 speaker -so signal stays digital until it's gone thru the DACs in my speakers. Have only listened to the analog out for about 5 min. and don't have a opinion on it.But boy-o-boy do I like this digi-out phono preamp !! I own and use the following:
ART DJ pre II (couple of stock units and one unit modified by a friend to have a 100kOhm input), Hagerman Bugle 2,two Lounge audio LCR III's -one standard 47kOhm -other 100 kOhm input, iFi Iphono mini II, two Parasound JC-3jr , a ELAC PPA-2 and a custom designed and built phono preamp that a friend built for himself and that I talked him into building one for me -up until the Puffin i would rate this as the quitest (spl check choke -noise free?) and most neutral of anything I own .
My opinion is that the Puffin is as close to just plain dead nutz neutral as anything I've got here - noise level run all digital-is simply amazing - I can run a ortofon MC-100 into it at 56db/200 ohms and it's quiet - this is a .07mV out cart- every other piece I own requires a appropriate SUT to boost it above the noise floor -somehow the Puffin even at relatively low MC gain just plays it fine ? Will create (with appropriate recordings) simply solid -nailed to the floor -stereo imaging.
 
My experience with a used DAC-1 strongly influenced the decision to buy a DAC-3 . I had used A EAD D/A converter for years and the Benchmark DAC-1 was the first DAC I had heard that saw off the EAD -bought it used and used it for 5? years or so -it developed a problem (don't remember what anymore ?) -sold it to a buddy who returned it to Benchmark for repair (at this point it was seven or eight years old). Benchmark upgraded it (3rd or 4th hand at this point) and fixed it -total repair cost incl. return shipping : $125.00, I repaired audio equipment to not quit make a living -$125.00 is a gift. Second issue was simply very well built - Pro audio is a different beast- IMO Benchmark earns their name. So DAC-3 HGC has a feature that I thought I would never use -digital pass thru. This is enabled via plug and a header array inside the unit -this turns the 4th RCA SPDIF into a digital pass thru -any other digital signal on the other inputs is simply passed thru and out what had been a input. For my setup this has been a pretty useful feature -I'm able to get a transparent conversion of incoming optical toslink and the remaining RCA SPDIF -so the Benchmark DAC-3 functions as a switching center for my digital feeds -this also makes the fine Headphone amp available for every corded phone I've got. I haven't done much side by side comparison of DAC's at all -reviews and tests of the DAC-3HGC were positive , personal track record with the DAC-1 was very positive and when you look at what's under the cover - my bet is they don't get too many failed units. I basically listen thru the 20 year old DAC's in my Meridian DSP-5000 speakers -so basically I only listen thru the Benchmark as a DAC when I put on wired headphones -it's very impressive used that way and with a couple of analog inputs and both balanced and RCA outputs -it's a very handy tool.
 
I like to listen to my Jazz vinyl's, but in all mono.
So I have to convert both stereo channels to mono.
The Puffin used as a digital phono signal converter, splendid. No phase shifting, as promised to me by the manufacturer.
I do not believe in holy grail gear, but this is the finest I`ve listen to.
This Puffin and a recently new custom-made Thai wood 13" clone, Gray 108 tonearm. This with a Shure M 44-7 is now my favorite "analog" tonearm combo.
Big fun!
 
Last edited:
i sold my Puffin and eventually got out of TT. even though it was a flexible unit, it didn't provide the sound quality that my Quicksilver Phono Pre did or even the Tavish unit. Sold them all and though I have 2 TT still, I haven't run one for going on 2 years. i still miss my LPs but not enough to struggle and suffer w lower SQ and the hassle/ cost of moving up the stack to more expensive and assumptively better kit.
 
I have upgraded to the 150 B version. However, I don't play very many mono records and it seems the upgrade is primarily focused on this feature with a few other minor changes to the filters and rumble. I would like to see more focus on improving the Magic function, record grading, etc. A great little device I really enjoy.
 
I like vinyl for nostalgic/impractical reasons that have little to do with sound quality (though my turntable rig these days does sound great with the right records), but I have to wonder about folks who are really in the "analog is better" camp. If these folks were to blind audition this Puffin thing and like the sound of it, will they hate it when they realize that the sound that they're actually getting is actually digital and not analog?
 
Back
Top Bottom