Ive heard nothing but good things so im looking forward to having it done, Sounds pretty good as is.I had the level 3 done to mine at Audioproz.....but can't compare it to the original sound as I had purchased one that was not working.
Ive heard nothing but good things so im looking forward to having it done, Sounds pretty good as is.I had the level 3 done to mine at Audioproz.....but can't compare it to the original sound as I had purchased one that was not working.
Strange to hear that because typically one of the key things that stands out with Haflers is being bullet proof and stable at 2 and 1 ohm loads..Power amps sound pretty much the same if well made, it's what signal you feed them and if they can run without running out of power on transients/dynamic peaks at very high listening volumes. The APT is a fantastic preamp, Hafler amps I have owned never survived extended high output listening sessions, never had luck with them but I am sure they are good amps for most listeners, they still seem like popular and affordable choices
Is there anyone that can offer a comparison of the APT Holman to a Nakamichi pre-amp?So it seems like this thread is still running along, so rather than start a new thread I will ask my question to the Ak members here. Has anyone been fortunate enough to own a APT Holman preamp and a Nakamichi CA-5 or CA-7 preamp?
I have my APT Holman which has been recapped and it has had the opamps upgraded as well so it sounds great, but I've never heard or owned a Nakamichi pre-amp so I wonder if they are considered to be an worthwhile upgrade compared to the APT Holman?
Can anyone offer any recommendations, specifically on the CA-5?
I can not offer a comparo of the APT to the Nak but I wouldn't expect a night & day difference.Is there anyone that can offer a comparison of the APT Holman to a Nakamichi pre-amp?
Hi Bob, thanks for your reply on the comparison. I personally think that the APT Holman should be able to hold it's own against the Nak, but as you have mentioned I would really like to hear from anyone that has owned both so they can provide their feedback. I would suspect that the Nak would probably need a service and possibly a recap by now due to it's age in order for the A/B comparison to be fair.I can not offer a comparo of the APT to the Nak but I wouldn't expect a night & day difference.
They are both quality pieces & I'd expect any differences to be subtle & more differences in flavor than out right superiority.
But, I'd also be interested to hear from someone who has done a comparison.
. Honestly I think you made the right choice with the Apt Holman pre. I like my DH-110 paired with HD-160, and DH-200. But it can be quirky (already bypassed the muting circuit). I have a second one ordered to steal parts from and a DH-220 on the bench waiting for restoration.
Any info about the APT model 2 amplifier ?
200 watts
Also they had a press release about a tuner too and pro amps
See pdf