• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

Are yellow Nippon Chemi-Con caps low leakage?

mstewart

Active Member
Trying to find out some information about the differences between the black and yellow Nippon Chemi-Con caps used in vintage stereos. I came across a thread that claimed the yellow caps were low leakage types. Yet, I am finding them in locations where the bom for a SX-636 has replaced them with Nichicon UPW's. I believe there are a couple yellow ones on the tone board and also the phono board. Any information is always appreciated.
 
Register to hide this ad
Trying to find out some information about the differences between the black and yellow Nippon Chemi-Con caps used in vintage stereos. I came across a thread that claimed the yellow caps were low leakage types. Yet, I am finding them in locations where the bom for a SX-636 has replaced them with Nichicon UPW's. I believe there are a couple yellow ones on the tone board and also the phono board. Any information is always appreciated.
UPW caps are low leakage by nature, and inherently low noise.(actually low ESR types) and will perform just dandy in those locations. In the signal path, anything 4.7uf and under I replace with film. In the power path, UPW.
 
I think you meant, UKL's are low leakage.
You have to be careful with films above 1uf. The size related to voltage values increase and may pose fit issues on the vintage boards.
I'd like to experiment with the newer Tantalum's, replacing them one for one. So far, I'm too chicken.
 
I think you meant, UKL's are low leakage.
You have to be careful with films above 1uf. The size related to voltage values increase and may pose fit issues on the vintage boards.
I'd like to experiment with the newer Tantalum's, replacing them one for one. So far, I'm too chicken.
Is that because of the history of the old tantalum caps?
 
UPW caps are low leakage by nature, and inherently low noise.(actually low ESR types) and will perform just dandy in those locations. In the signal path, anything 4.7uf and under I replace with film. In the power path, UPW.
I've heard that said about film caps. So that's what I've been doing. In another post I read through someone said you should install UKL's where the yellow Chemi-Con's are. But if UPW's are suitable that's good because I already have them here. :banana:
 
Ultimate arbiter is the unit's BOM data as supplied by the old Pioneer service manual.

IMO using UKL won't HURT even if it does not HELP.
Understood. I did notice the service manual didn't specify low leakage caps where yellow ones are used. If it's not helping anything I'm sticking with the UPW's I already bought. I did notice in locations on the tone board where they have 4.7uf 25v orange caps the service manual also doesn't specify low leakage caps for those locations. Didn't Pioneer usually use the orange caps in locations where the service manual called for CEANL caps?
 
I have used current issue tantalum caps to replace originals in the preamp sections of a couple of Marantz receivers just to see how they would perform and have had no issue.
They were used as a test where space was a consideration.
 
I think you meant, UKL's are low leakage.
You have to be careful with films above 1uf. The size related to voltage values increase and may pose fit issues on the vintage boards.
I'd like to experiment with the newer Tantalum's, replacing them one for one. So far, I'm too chicken.
Yes, UKL are low leakage. But also with newer processes and materials, UPW leakage spec is up to snuff, as good as 50 yr old LL of the day.
Yes Tantalums can be in some tight spaces, but there is no "rule" for mounting film caps flush on the boards. But in some spaces, space can be really tight when surrounded by many components. I have many times mounted components to the foil side instead to free up room.
There is nothing "wrong" with using fresh modern dipped Tantalums. But use higher voltage when replacing them. If the original is 35v, use a 50v. Be sure to pay attention to polarity as the POSITIVE is usually marked, not the negative. When a tant "pops it's top", it literally explodes with a vengeance..
 
Understood. I did notice the service manual didn't specify low leakage caps where yellow ones are used. If it's not helping anything I'm sticking with the UPW's I already bought. I did notice in locations on the tone board where they have 4.7uf 25v orange caps the service manual also doesn't specify low leakage caps for those locations. Didn't Pioneer usually use the orange caps in locations where the service manual called for CEANL caps?
The orange Nichicon caps with the shiny black seal are "audio" caps of the day and were Low Leakage/Low noise. Modern quality caps perform just as good. Using film in their place is best since it eliminates any effects of electrolytic such as ESR and noise, allowing the AC signal to pass cleanly. It is also best to determine which lead is the "outside foil side" lead to use in the negative spot, but that's splitting hairs in SS gear. Having the signal on the outside foil side CAN lead to picking up noise. But in practice it has proven to be negligible for the most part. Although some die-hards are meticulous about it. Tube gear is a lot more susceptible to noise than Solid State so it does pay in tube gear. Mr. Carlson's Lab on You Tube had a video about it about a year or so ago, and how to find which side is the outside foil lead using an oscilloscope.
 
Is that because of the history of the old tantalum caps?
Well Tantalum caps will explode when they fail, and the resulting fireball "ain't pretty".. Not to mention the "oooh, that smell" :eek:. And it seems the "audio quality" isn't all that great either compared to a modern electrolytic. A Tantalum IS an electrolytic by nature, it's just a "solid" type. Modern Tantalums have been reported by some to sound "just fine" though. But we all know "sounds fine" is very subjective. Back in the day, they were used mostly in tight places for their size. And the end result was "in spec" for THD/Noise for the price point.
This is one result of a Tantalum failure. It was a 6.8uf 25v Tant running on regulated 12vDC and it still exploded with a vengeance. This was in a Telescope hand controller. That flat keypad cable is irreplaceable. The explosions on the main board in the base of the scope is just as ugly, and it takes out the main ROM chip that is also irreplaceable. I see a Tant, I "shoot on sight" without hesitation. Space is limited so I use a modern 50v Tant when replacing them. A small electrolytic would dry out too fast, and a film is too big to fit.
Ribbon cable hole.jpg
 
The orange Nichicon caps with the shiny black seal are "audio" caps of the day and were Low Leakage/Low noise. Modern quality caps perform just as good. Using film in their place is best since it eliminates any effects of electrolytic such as ESR and noise, allowing the AC signal to pass cleanly. It is also best to determine which lead is the "outside foil side" lead to use in the negative spot, but that's splitting hairs in SS gear. Having the signal on the outside foil side CAN lead to picking up noise. But in practice it has proven to be negligible for the most part. Although some die-hards are meticulous about it. Tube gear is a lot more susceptible to noise than Solid State so it does pay in tube gear. Mr. Carlson's Lab on You Tube had a video about it about a year or so ago, and how to find which side is the outside foil lead using an oscilloscope.
That's interesting. I always thought it didn't make a difference with film caps due to them being bipolar. FWIW I did end up using Wimas in place of the orange 4.7uf 25v caps. Although I didn't install them in any specific orientation.
 
Well Tantalum caps will explode when they fail, and the resulting fireball "ain't pretty".. Not to mention the "oooh, that smell" :eek:. And it seems the "audio quality" isn't all that great either compared to a modern electrolytic. A Tantalum IS an electrolytic by nature, it's just a "solid" type. Modern Tantalums have been reported by some to sound "just fine" though. But we all know "sounds fine" is very subjective. Back in the day, they were used mostly in tight places for their size. And the end result was "in spec" for THD/Noise for the price point.
This is one result of a Tantalum failure. It was a 6.8uf 25v Tant running on regulated 12vDC and it still exploded with a vengeance. This was in a Telescope hand controller. That flat keypad cable is irreplaceable. The explosions on the main board in the base of the scope is just as ugly, and it takes out the main ROM chip that is also irreplaceable. I see a Tant, I "shoot on sight" without hesitation. Space is limited so I use a modern 50v Tant when replacing them. A small electrolytic would dry out too fast, and a film is too big to fit.
View attachment 1937455
Wow!
 
That's interesting. I always thought it didn't make a difference with film caps due to them being bipolar. FWIW I did end up using Wimas in place of the orange 4.7uf 25v caps. Although I didn't install them in any specific orientation.
Most of the time it's a non issue. Only on the very rare occasion if a component carrying signal that is up against the cap will there be any "noticeable" noise. Even then it will be so subtle it's hardly an issue and might be "seen" on a scope, but not "heard" with the ear.. I personally have had no issues whatsoever with orienting film caps in SS gear. As far as replacing non-polar electrolytic caps, it's easy to see the foil side lead, it's the "short" one just as the negative lead is in a polarized electrolytic. The modern manufacturing process is the same for either one.
 
I'm a big fan of Mr. Carlson and do find the outside foil lead on the tube equipment I work. I needed a good reason to build something like his foil test circuit and this is a better reason to do it.
Film cap polarity in the SS is like asking which way to reload the toilet paper dispenser. There's always a right way. If anything else it's a feeling of going the extra distance on the work.
Youtube'er "xraytonyb" has a foil finder device that is way more DIY than Mr. C's. The scope is fine but for reading the bigger film values, you need more than just a scope.
 
Most of the time it's a non issue. Only on the very rare occasion if a component carrying signal that is up against the cap will there be any "noticeable" noise. Even then it will be so subtle it's hardly an issue and might be "seen" on a scope, but not "heard" with the ear.. I personally have had no issues whatsoever with orienting film caps in SS gear. As far as replacing non-polar electrolytic caps, it's easy to see the foil side lead, it's the "short" one just as the negative lead is in a polarized electrolytic. The modern manufacturing process is the same for either one.
Up to this point I haven't used any nonpolar electrolytic caps in my stereos. Now that I'm slowly getting a better understanding of what I'm doing I want to start experimenting with different caps. I believe this information will be useful going forward. Thank you for explaining it.
 
I'm a big fan of Mr. Carlson and do find the outside foil lead on the tube equipment I work. I needed a good reason to build something like his foil test circuit and this is a better reason to do it.
Film cap polarity in the SS is like asking which way to reload the toilet paper dispenser. There's always a right way. If anything else it's a feeling of going the extra distance on the work.
Youtube'er "xraytonyb" has a foil finder device that is way more DIY than Mr. C's. The scope is fine but for reading the bigger film values, you need more than just a scope.
This post just brought back a long forgotten memory of a heated debate with an old girlfriend about the toilet paper roll. :rflmao:
 
Up to this point I haven't used any nonpolar electrolytic caps in my stereos. Now that I'm slowly getting a better understanding of what I'm doing I want to start experimenting with different caps. I believe this information will be useful going forward. Thank you for explaining it.
You gotta watch it, there are Bi-Polar (also known as non-polar) caps in a LOT of gear in specific places.
 
Back
Top Bottom