• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

Astatic MF200 or New cart

ChadGio

New Member
Ok guys here's my dilemma. I have an astatic mf200 that came on my restored tt. It has low hours on the stylist and sounds amazing. But the Unicorn replacement stylists are making me super nervous. I have decided I am going to either grab a nos MF400 stylist on eBay (downgrade in sound), or pick up an AT150MLX and part with the astatic. My tone arm is a low mass arm (signet XK35) and I have read the at150mlx would be a good fit. What should I do? Will the AT be a big step down? How big of a difference is the MF400 stylist from the MF200? Any help is greatly appreciated.
 
Register to hide this ad
Anyone.. Anyone... Bueller.... Bueller...

How about any suggestions for good replacements to match my mf-200?
 
I wish the Astatic MF 200 were available and in production now. I liked them, never owned one. Rugged and good. And I do like the AT 150 MLx and 440 MLb a lot.
 
I have an MF400 and I really like how the smooth sound that comes out of it is. I really do wish it had a better diamond on the end, and personally I'd re-tip mine if I managed to save up enough money for it.
The AT150MLX is quite good as well but the sound won't be the same. For the $300 (?) that the AT150mlx retails for, it might be better to re-tip it (MF200) from someone like Andy @ Needle clinic, for a fraction of the price and still retain that classic Astatic sound
 
They are the same cartridges which were sold under the Glanz brand in Europe, made by Mitachi in Japan. I haven't heard the Astatics, but their specs seem worse for some reason than the Glanz models. The Glanz range was very broad and I don't know the differences between all of them, they had several ranges of these "moving flux" models with different 'levels' (according to stylus shape), but all the cartridge bodies seem physically identical and styli are interchangeable. Anyway the bottom line is they are excellent cartridges, and I'm assuming the Astatics sound pretty much the same. I have a nude elliptical model and a two of the bottom of the line bonded spherical. They retain mostly the same sound signature, but the sphericals (which I think would be close to MF-400) are a bit more closed off in the ultimate highs and just lack some of the refinement. But even they are very enjoyable cartridges. I think the bottom models also had slightly higher inductance, but I'm not 100% on that without looking it up, but if I recall correctly they have 150mH vs. 100mH of the upper range models. Both are low figures for a high output MM. The better Glanz models are probably closest to moving coils I've heard in a high output MM in terms of natural openess, but they sound noticeably warmer than any MC I've heard, which might be a good or bad thing depending on your system. But the bottom line is they sound very natural and effortless to my ears, with no nasty peaks.

It's too bad original styli are so scarce (basically unobtanium), only the MF-400 styli seem to pop up from time to time - and there are no after market replacements available that I know of. Excellent cartridges anyway.
 
Anyone.. Anyone... Bueller.... Bueller...

How about any suggestions for good replacements to match my mf-200?
Astatic MF 100 and 200 are the top of the line with Shabbat stylus. The MF 300 and 400 are elliptical stylus in my resource.
I am sorry I sold my restored Dual 1229 with Astatic MF 200, a dream combo.
Now I use a Thorens 160 totally restored and use a Grace F9 rubbey cantilever and line contact stylus , great retipping job at Sound Smith. Grace F9 wow

Great mm cartridge
 
Ok guys here's my dilemma. I have an astatic mf200 that came on my restored tt. It has low hours on the stylist and sounds amazing. But the Unicorn replacement stylists are making me super nervous. I have decided I am going to either grab a nos MF400 stylist on eBay (downgrade in sound), or pick up an AT150MLX and part with the astatic. My tone arm is a low mass arm (signet XK35) and I have read the at150mlx would be a good fit. What should I do? Will the AT be a big step down? How big of a difference is the MF400 stylist from the MF200? Any help is greatly appreciated.
Are the main bodies of the Astatic 100 and 200 the same? I realize the stylii are different but I have 2 spare new in box stylii for my MF200 and was wondering if they would fit the 200. Not sure if it would be any better than the 200 I already have.
 
Are the main bodies of the Astatic 100 and 200 the same? I realize the stylii are different but I have 2 spare new in box stylii for my MF200 and was wondering if they would fit the 200. Not sure if it would be any better than the 200 I already have.
I meant to say would the MF200 Stylus fit the MF100 body and would it sound better than my MF200 body with the MF200 stylus.
 
Back
Top Bottom