• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

AU-519: listeners' impressions?

ignoramustot

Active Member
Hi Sansui fans and gurus

The AU-519 seems one of the less common members of the Sansui integrated amp clan, and was made for barely two years (1979-80). I've found only a few postings here about it, mostly from a decade or more ago, and mostly mentioning the AU519 in terms of its features, design and construction relative to the rapid changes in Sansui's amp line-up in the late 1970s and early 1980s.

Does anyone have any impressions of how the AU-519 sounds that they're willing to share, please?

Given the 317 and 517 are often said to be good sweet spots in the x17 series, I'm especially interested to hear how the 519 sounds relative to the AU-517 and AU-317, and perhaps relative to the two-generations-previous AU-7900 and its kin, if anyone has an experience basis for such comparison.

Any comments on the strengths or characteristics of the 519's sound (even "it's good for ...." music genre comments) would be interesting and potentially useful to others.

From the available design and spec info on the 519, I'd expect a good example has a bit more clarity and detail, especially in the mid and upper frequencies, than good examples of the preceding models, but it would be interesting to hear from those with "lived experience" of the comparison.

(Of course, when discussing amps this old, the amps' condition is perhaps the biggest cause of variability, but let's see what is shared...)

There are plenty of comments around here and elsewhere about the design, features and sounds of the AU-717, 719 and 919, but they're all way out of my league, budget-wise.

Many thanks and best wishes for your 'Sui listening.
Rob
 
Register to hide this ad
I regret selling mine in a gear clear out during a covid related unemployment period........Mine was completely recapped and serviced, etc. or was before I acquired it 3 years prior; so I have a pretty good idea. Basically, IMHO it may be the Sansui golden child, in terms of value/performance. And of course the AU717 (if one prefers a couple more tone control frequency points), but really the AU-517 is phenomenal especially if recapped. Depending on the speaker, the bottom end could seem slightly loose, but only if I'm being picky. I also had a Proton D1200 at the same time, so every other amp I've owned would fare worse in that area. Overall it is more than adequate in terms of power by modern standards, with independent power supplies (which sansui manufactured some of the best) and as for the sound: It is very smooth on the top end, but yet can really pull out subtle details etc. I have horn speakers and I NEVER got ear fatigue when listening with that amp. But it seemed to bend 4 completely different designed speakers pairs to it's will from high efficiency horns to Acoustic suspensions etc. One of the sweet things about this integrated amp(besides it and the 717 having the best build quality vs the integrateds released later on by sansui) is that you can select between DC and cap coupled output from the pre amp section......IDK how rare that is overall, but when ya go down the rabbit hole in this hobby, like myself, it really allows you to either tailor the sound a bit or mate with any other additional power amps.....ie. I like using mine as a pre for the Proton D1200 power amp. I'l forever be saddened losing that SS Vintage setup, even vs esoteric brand gear. Oh well, winters around the corner here, so I guess I can make due with my tubes. Of which I'll say it's power amp section was glorious with a 12au7 Aikido preamp on the front end. I suppose the best comment I can give is that the AU517 never left the rack. No matter what new piece(s) were being auditioned etc., The AU-517 was my general benchmark in terms of using it as both a pre and power amp and also just by itself (abiet with it's matching TU-517 and AX-8 mixer)
 
The 519 had the same DD/DC topology as its bigger brother 719. A tad less power (difficult to notice) and has the benefit of the connected/separated pre/main switch which the 719 does not (which is a blessing or a curse depending on whether gone actually need it, and can clean it when it inevitably becomes dirty!).

Excellent amp though. Mich like the 719, a bit more clarity and refinement over the 517/717 to my ears.
 
I found the 517/717 vs the 719/919 to be preferable.....I can't remember if it was a 719 or the models after it and 919 to lean towards a slight edge in the treble and having a cheaper build quality (ie. just look through the case from the top, whilst this particu;llar item doesn't effect sound quality, I think the individual bell covers on the transformers in the 517/717 with Sansui labels on them vs the plain/exposed transformers in the 719s etc, show the beginnings of cost cutting during the years post the 517/717 (but that was typical across the board for most brands at the time). It really depends on what speakers you have or plan on using with the amp. I can say that the tech I knew, who gave me a 517 from his personal rack (and I suppose myself) think that the 717 is much better than the 719/919.....and I hate to speculate, since I wasn't old enough to remember, but overall I've seen way more 517/717s, especially recapped in the wild the last decade, which leads me to believe that the 517/717 were built better and meant to last forever, if taken care of, etc.............Also, the good thing about a lot of the idiots overpricing vintage gear on that auction site I loathe, is that you can find one in good condition for cheaper due to people thinking they have a channel out, etc. (when in actuality it is because of that cap coupled output/direct coupled switch, or potentially it's sweitched to "seperated" and the people don't realize it's the switch in the wrong setting....it's the only other issue I meant to mention before. In any case, that switch can be fixed without opening the case a la Deoxit, a lil dab will do ya for about 3-4 years, assuming one doesn't do anything else to said switch. My tech felt bad about losing the items he traded me for a Pioneer SX-1010 that I recapped. Moreso the Proton D-1200 (restored) and of all things a lower powered Fisher Futura 202. To think I got 1 restored Marantz 2238(and 1 was for spare parts), A restored marantz 6300 turntable, along with the restored proton, 517 and Fisher Futura, for that one monster pioneer!! I told him about the sansui switch issue, and he emailed me the next weekend wherein he found a 717 at a flea market for 50 bucks because they thought it was broken, but even still.....about 1.5yrs later....out of all the pieces I just listed, I swear to god.....the piece of gear he wished he had back was the FIsher Futura....and he threw that one in as a freebie. It was hooked up to his reel to reel, and he thought the sound quality was because of the reel to reel, but after the trade he wquicly realized the fisher was the piece responsible. This trade of trades, was right about the time all the younger folk went bananas with anything with the marantz name on it, especially the 22xx series. During a move I had to unload my 2238 in a mint wood case in 2018 for $500....so that hurt from a financial aspect the last couple of years, but as far as flexibility and sound quality, I wish I had my restoredf Proton back, with the 517 a close second. I had a chance to obtain a restored Sansui AU-919 or AU 719, but to my ears or IMHO, they didn't sound better. Not bad, per se.......but I suppose they sounded like one of the slimmer TOTL 1980s Technics receivers (after/without the New Class A or Class AA badges on them). I also forget which model it was....it could be the au-d1x or maybe 919 etc. that was much more difficult to repair, even with upgraded components and wasn't as reliable as a 517, even in stock. But yeah , what speakers do you have? or might be planning on usuing with your new sansui gear? If one had power hungry speakers, I could see how pete adores the sound of the 719/919.....especially the 919. When an amp can't handle the low end, the 1st thing that sends one racing for the volume knob is clipping in the treble. Me having DIY Cornscala variant speakers at 103Db/ a watt efficiency does allow me much more flexibility, without the need for a typical higher watt amp, but even still....another compliment to all these amps, but verified with my 517 only, is that it was dead quiet and is HUGE positive considering my speakers. Let's just say that they expose any weakness in ones chain considering they theoretically only need 1 watt to produce 106db loud music in my home. And yet, it never left the rack. I can also easily see wherein everyone who owned any of these integrateds thinks their model is probably the best. To me, if I wanted to the 517 to sound mor elike a 719/919, I just had to turn the treble knob to +2. I apologize if I missed this info, but are you a veteran of this hobby, or jut getting started and/or possibly looking for a forever integrated? I figured the answer to that and/or your speakers can make much more of a difference, in terms of what your ears might prefer. However, I stand by the 517/717 build and component quality being a notch above. It still hurts losing 2 marantz 2238s, 6300 turntable, the sansui, proton, AND the fisher (and it wasn't restored!!) I lived with a 517 for a pretty long time, and with answers to those 2 questions above, might be able to produce potentially cheaper options you can acquire that beat all the Sansui's in consideration, fwiw anyway. It's damn shame that vintage prices have gone to insane levels compared to 15yrs ago. In this short time, pieces yanked from 2 decades of attic storage without even so much as a bias check, now cost anywhere from 5-10 times more. Sad really, I even managed to leave behind a pioneer SX-626 I acquired from my dad as a teenager, back in 2013.....as I could snag one ]rehabbed and shipped to my door for about $75-$100 bucks. Sorry for the long post! But your current system/speakers could really dictate your choice, here. I don't want to ruin the thread on this tangent, but after building one myself and listening to 2 Aikidos that were built by someone else for me, etc. I'm willing to say that I've given up on trying to buy any vintage piece, esp integrateds or receivers wherein the pre amp and amps are used in unison. WHen ya factor in the odds of a 517 being shipped to your door without being dropped at least thrice, and typical vintage maitenance etc, I'd rather find/recommend a 12AU7 Aikido Pre-amp matched with a favorite amp of yours. It universally can drive ANY amplifier and sounds equal to separate preamps costing $5000-$10,000, and do it for only $500!! IOW, one can pay 5 times as much for a 517 to 919 of completely unknown quality if shipped, compared to 2017 vs possibly an Aikido coupled with just about any decent power section and blow it away. The aikido is something that really is hard to appreciate until one hears a proper one. I'm known to tweak tone controls and yet my aikidos dont have them and don't need them. I never entered the sometimes snobby audiophile, "no tone controls" camp before or until the aikido (built by blair chapman) arrived. Again, sorry for going off tangent, but I'd feel remiss if I didn't suggest the possibility of an aikido on the front end, I've had one of those in my rack for the last 7 years, and really because I seriously doubt one can find a better preamp for the price, coupled with the Seperates= better than integrateds/receivers. Trsut me when I say you can take an aikido and drive a magnavox console SE amp or to stay on point, your random favorite sansui amp section and it will be genuinely better than any sansui integrated in the 517/717 price range. I know the aikido is a tube pre- but not like what one thinks in terms of sound. Very 3D soundstage, but with speed attack/timing and decay more aligned with esoteric branded SS preamps costing 5-10 thousand. Not an exaggeration, you couold even build the 12volt version or all-in one, but I'd suggest to find a prebuilt one from one of the senior members on Audiokarma. I'm currently trying to build/layout a 12au7 point to popint wired version of the only aikido topology preamp Blair ever built vs SEPP preamps.....and hopefully either make it easier to DIY since it's unbeatable unless one goes into the level or point of dimishing returns based on price. But around $500 for a prebuilt will save ya huge headaches as the aikido doesn't have a documented single and/or standard version, aside from VTA current offering. And there's crucial accidental mistakes based off some part values in earlier manuals and what not, even simple things like wiring the vol pot can cause one to almost give up when building this preamp. It'll cost you probably over $500 to build one with premium parts yourself though, and is a primary reason to acquire one on this site. I have a feeling that the prices may go up quite a bit very soon, but yeah the reason it's cost is so low is because they are built DIY via the board kits or point to point, vs a singular or various built branded AIkidos by Broskie. I just couldn't let anyone pay
 
oh yeah, and I had an AU-317.......I found it to be more similar to the AU-517 that I thought it would sound or be capable of......most people shun it for only having a singular power supply.....a la the HK330B vs it's dual trans counterparts in the same series, too. I remember getting it for 50 bucks at the time, which is crazy nowadays unless you get one from a member on here. They can be way overpriced today, but overall I could be happy with a 317 vs paying the premium for a 517/717
 
I found the 517/717 vs the 719/919 to be preferable.....I can't remember if it was a 719 or the models after it and 919 to lean towards a slight edge in the treble and having a cheaper build quality (ie. just look through the case from the top, whilst this particu;llar item doesn't effect sound quality, I think the individual bell covers on the transformers in the 517/717 with Sansui labels on them vs the plain/exposed transformers in the 719s etc, show the beginnings of cost cutting during the years post the 517/717 (but that was typical across the board for most brands at the time). It really depends on what speakers you have or plan on using with the amp. I can say that the tech I knew, who gave me a 517 from his personal rack (and I suppose myself) think that the 717 is much better than the 719/919.....and I hate to speculate, since I wasn't old enough to remember, but overall I've seen way more 517/717s, especially recapped in the wild the last decade, which leads me to believe that the 517/717 were built better and meant to last forever, if taken care of, etc.............Also, the good thing about a lot of the idiots overpricing vintage gear on that auction site I loathe, is that you can find one in good condition for cheaper due to people thinking they have a channel out, etc. (when in actuality it is because of that cap coupled output/direct coupled switch, or potentially it's sweitched to "seperated" and the people don't realize it's the switch in the wrong setting....it's the only other issue I meant to mention before. In any case, that switch can be fixed without opening the case a la Deoxit, a lil dab will do ya for about 3-4 years, assuming one doesn't do anything else to said switch. My tech felt bad about losing the items he traded me for a Pioneer SX-1010 that I recapped. Moreso the Proton D-1200 (restored) and of all things a lower powered Fisher Futura 202. To think I got 1 restored Marantz 2238(and 1 was for spare parts), A restored marantz 6300 turntable, along with the restored proton, 517 and Fisher Futura, for that one monster pioneer!! I told him about the sansui switch issue, and he emailed me the next weekend wherein he found a 717 at a flea market for 50 bucks because they thought it was broken, but even still.....about 1.5yrs later....out of all the pieces I just listed, I swear to god.....the piece of gear he wished he had back was the FIsher Futura....and he threw that one in as a freebie. It was hooked up to his reel to reel, and he thought the sound quality was because of the reel to reel, but after the trade he wquicly realized the fisher was the piece responsible. This trade of trades, was right about the time all the younger folk went bananas with anything with the marantz name on it, especially the 22xx series. During a move I had to unload my 2238 in a mint wood case in 2018 for $500....so that hurt from a financial aspect the last couple of years, but as far as flexibility and sound quality, I wish I had my restoredf Proton back, with the 517 a close second. I had a chance to obtain a restored Sansui AU-919 or AU 719, but to my ears or IMHO, they didn't sound better. Not bad, per se.......but I suppose they sounded like one of the slimmer TOTL 1980s Technics receivers (after/without the New Class A or Class AA badges on them). I also forget which model it was....it could be the au-d1x or maybe 919 etc. that was much more difficult to repair, even with upgraded components and wasn't as reliable as a 517, even in stock. But yeah , what speakers do you have? or might be planning on usuing with your new sansui gear? If one had power hungry speakers, I could see how pete adores the sound of the 719/919.....especially the 919. When an amp can't handle the low end, the 1st thing that sends one racing for the volume knob is clipping in the treble. Me having DIY Cornscala variant speakers at 103Db/ a watt efficiency does allow me much more flexibility, without the need for a typical higher watt amp, but even still....another compliment to all these amps, but verified with my 517 only, is that it was dead quiet and is HUGE positive considering my speakers. Let's just say that they expose any weakness in ones chain considering they theoretically only need 1 watt to produce 106db loud music in my home. And yet, it never left the rack. I can also easily see wherein everyone who owned any of these integrateds thinks their model is probably the best. To me, if I wanted to the 517 to sound mor elike a 719/919, I just had to turn the treble knob to +2. I apologize if I missed this info, but are you a veteran of this hobby, or jut getting started and/or possibly looking for a forever integrated? I figured the answer to that and/or your speakers can make much more of a difference, in terms of what your ears might prefer. However, I stand by the 517/717 build and component quality being a notch above. It still hurts losing 2 marantz 2238s, 6300 turntable, the sansui, proton, AND the fisher (and it wasn't restored!!) I lived with a 517 for a pretty long time, and with answers to those 2 questions above, might be able to produce potentially cheaper options you can acquire that beat all the Sansui's in consideration, fwiw anyway. It's damn shame that vintage prices have gone to insane levels compared to 15yrs ago. In this short time, pieces yanked from 2 decades of attic storage without even so much as a bias check, now cost anywhere from 5-10 times more. Sad really, I even managed to leave behind a pioneer SX-626 I acquired from my dad as a teenager, back in 2013.....as I could snag one ]rehabbed and shipped to my door for about $75-$100 bucks. Sorry for the long post! But your current system/speakers could really dictate your choice, here. I don't want to ruin the thread on this tangent, but after building one myself and listening to 2 Aikidos that were built by someone else for me, etc. I'm willing to say that I've given up on trying to buy any vintage piece, esp integrateds or receivers wherein the pre amp and amps are used in unison. WHen ya factor in the odds of a 517 being shipped to your door without being dropped at least thrice, and typical vintage maitenance etc, I'd rather find/recommend a 12AU7 Aikido Pre-amp matched with a favorite amp of yours. It universally can drive ANY amplifier and sounds equal to separate preamps costing $5000-$10,000, and do it for only $500!! IOW, one can pay 5 times as much for a 517 to 919 of completely unknown quality if shipped, compared to 2017 vs possibly an Aikido coupled with just about any decent power section and blow it away. The aikido is something that really is hard to appreciate until one hears a proper one. I'm known to tweak tone controls and yet my aikidos dont have them and don't need them. I never entered the sometimes snobby audiophile, "no tone controls" camp before or until the aikido (built by blair chapman) arrived. Again, sorry for going off tangent, but I'd feel remiss if I didn't suggest the possibility of an aikido on the front end, I've had one of those in my rack for the last 7 years, and really because I seriously doubt one can find a better preamp for the price, coupled with the Seperates= better than integrateds/receivers. Trsut me when I say you can take an aikido and drive a magnavox console SE amp or to stay on point, your random favorite sansui amp section and it will be genuinely better than any sansui integrated in the 517/717 price range. I know the aikido is a tube pre- but not like what one thinks in terms of sound. Very 3D soundstage, but with speed attack/timing and decay more aligned with esoteric branded SS preamps costing 5-10 thousand. Not an exaggeration, you couold even build the 12volt version or all-in one, but I'd suggest to find a prebuilt one from one of the senior members on Audiokarma. I'm currently trying to build/layout a 12au7 point to popint wired version of the only aikido topology preamp Blair ever built vs SEPP preamps.....and hopefully either make it easier to DIY since it's unbeatable unless one goes into the level or point of dimishing returns based on price. But around $500 for a prebuilt will save ya huge headaches as the aikido doesn't have a documented single and/or standard version, aside from VTA current offering. And there's crucial accidental mistakes based off some part values in earlier manuals and what not, even simple things like wiring the vol pot can cause one to almost give up when building this preamp. It'll cost you probably over $500 to build one with premium parts yourself though, and is a primary reason to acquire one on this site. I have a feeling that the prices may go up quite a bit very soon, but yeah the reason it's cost is so low is because they are built DIY via the board kits or point to point, vs a singular or various built branded AIkidos by Broskie. I just couldn't let anyone pay
I so wanted to read this but it hurt my eyes. Separate paragraphs helps a lot. Sorry.
 
I restored an AU-517 and was thoroughly impressed with its sound signature and power. In my opinion, it is a model that is a raging steal/maximum bang for the buck, and would allow someone with a moderate budget to own a great amp.
 
and I hate to speculate, since I wasn't old enough to remember, but overall I've seen way more 517/717s, especially recapped in the wild the last decade, which leads me to believe that the 517/717 were built better and meant to last forever, if taken care of, etc.............

That's purely a factor of sales - Sansui sold more of the earlier generation. Reliability doesn't come into it.

If one had power hungry speakers, I could see how pete adores the sound of the 719/919.....especially the 919. When an amp can't handle the low end, the 1st thing that sends one racing for the volume knob is clipping in the treble. Me having DIY Cornscala variant speakers at 103Db/ a watt efficiency does allow me much more flexibility, without the need for a typical higher watt amp

I've never run particularly power-hungry speakers, and don't listen at elevated levels. I just find the later model DD/DC amps to be better all-round versus the older generation. If you run DIY Cornscalas, I'm not surprised that you'd tend towards amps on the warmer side of the spectrum. Efficient horns are not particularly forgiving, and I'd contend that the later model Sansuis are simply emphasising the inherent sonic characteristics of the Cornscalas, rather than the amps themselves being bright. It just goes to show that one needs to take into account the synergy between amps and speakers, along with our own personal preferences. There are no absolutes in the world of audio!
 
That's purely a factor of sales - Sansui sold more of the earlier generation. Reliability doesn't come into it.



I've never run particularly power-hungry speakers, and don't listen at elevated levels. I just find the later model DD/DC amps to be better all-round versus the older generation. If you run DIY Cornscalas, I'm not surprised that you'd tend towards amps on the warmer side of the spectrum. Efficient horns are not particularly forgiving, and I'd contend that the later model Sansuis are simply emphasising the inherent sonic characteristics of the Cornscalas, rather than the amps themselves being bright. It just goes to show that one needs to take into account the synergy between amps and speakers, along with our own personal preferences. There are no absolutes in the world of audio!
yep or.......iow it's always 100% about synergy, coupled with the fact we all hear differently. TBH, it's always weird to answer posts like this, because being a scientist, my brain tells me not to answer or give credence to most replies, as there are too many variables and lack of controls, to be able to categorize most gear.......at least from a general perspective. The reason I made such long replies is that regardless, this piece of gear is special, at least in terms of price compared to other sansui pieces I see selling for much more (although all vintage pieces are overpriced since around 6 or 7 years ago.....its sad, really; because I would have never gotten into the hobby if they were as inflated back around 2011 or maybe a decade ago). I wouldn't focus/emphasize my horns/cornscalas, as I thought I had mentioned that it was 100% in use during the years I owned mine, and the majority of that time, I only auditioned 2 sets of super heresys I had built for around 3 months. Hmmmm.......lemme think, but I know that I used it through Boston Acoustic A150s, Sansui SP-1000s, 1700s, 2500s, 2 sets of JBLs I think one set was L80s(I forget the models...one of which is shameful since one set was a xmas present in 1986), Polk Monitor 70 series II, Monitor 40s, Polk LSiM 703s and 705s (very very power hungry) etc. So yeah, the point was I was trying to make was that it didn't matter what type or brand of speaker, including my klipsch heritage and other horns......my sansui AU-517 (that was recapped/rebuilt to sound like it did when originally sold) always shined and sounded pretty much the same no matter what.....or IOW was able to have synergy with every speaker, preamp, and or power amp I owned over 5-6 years. Most of those being while in my deepest depths of the tweaking audiophile rabbit hole, and yet...........It ALWAYS was in use or never rotated out of my main system. And because it was so satisfying, I auditioned other sansui integrateds up the chain but they never gave me reason to acquire them. Yeah, I might have had to tweak the tone controls a tad for it to have synergy with all the different gear, but not much. While there are no absolutes, no doubt, I did find it oddly exceptional in that I NEVER had to ever clean any switches or knobs (sans the problematic CC or DC coupled switch between the preouts and main amp input)......that was definitely a 1st. I didn't do all the work myself on my unit though, but I have seen the internals of similarly priced sansui integrateds that followed the AU517 and 717, and the build quality seemed to take a turn. I always wondered, since I was in diapers when released, but the 517 and 717 look more akin to the typical BPC modern gear during a time when the hifi universe was a world of silver and pretty lights. It's a shame that a particular sale fell through and I never obtained the equalizer (SE8 ??) for this series' rack. As my former college room mate has the turntable (828 I believe) and so I was soooooo close to having a complete sansui rack....including the rack itself (and why I obtained various monkey coffin sansui spoeakers). Had I obtained that EQ, my friend would have given me the turntable, and doubt I would have ever sold it, even in the face of homelessness. I also FWIW, never auditioned the other DC integrateds on my high efficiency horns, outside of the ones in the sansui speakers, that were highly efficient as well. But like we agree, we all have different rooms, tastes, hearing ability, speakers, or acoustic treatments, etc. It's just been that, in my experience, everyone who heard the 517 loved it and the way it sounded. It is a beast, in that I can't imagine anyone wondering how it sounds, would be disappointed with it, whether used as a preamp, power amp, a capacitor coupled integrated stereo amp, or direct coupled integrated stereo amp. The only nitpick would be not having the 2 diff frequency points one can choose in the other sansui integrateds; and that would only matter/be a factor depending on where the freq in one's speakers' crossovers are decidedly located. As far as power, I had many 150 watt plus modern stereo amps, that would have difficulty with the polk LSiM 703s and 705s, yet the sansui didn't break a sweat.
 
@ericc129 I’m glad you love the 517 sound as you do - I adored my fully restored 517 until the 719 came along, which I subjectively prefer across a variety of speakers and sources and different rooms.

I know the sound of Sansuis across the eras very well, having either owned them or benefitted from enjoying them as part of my father’s extensive collection. We still have quite a few 517s and 717s, along with the smaller models and the later 519, 719, 919 and the BA/CA-F1 combo.

I simply have a preference for the later DD/DC sound, further improved upon as Sansui embarked upon its X-balanced journey during the 80s and 90s.

Our opinions are equally as valid and is very useful for the OP to hear both sides of the story and hear different perspectives. We’re certainly swimming in the sea of subjectivity here.
 
Last edited:
Thanks all, I think my original question has been answered, and I appreciate the generous sharing of experience and perspectives. There's heaps of info elsewhere about the 717 vs 719, etc, so I think that's best pursued via those threads. Cheers
 
Back
Top Bottom