• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

B&K comparison

The SE-100 is better than the BK pro 5, is cheap but very good
The Iris and the 915 have the same topology, but the Iris has the tendency to fail do to the Tantalum caps
The B&K Pro 10 and Sonata have better build quality, but the Iris and 915 sound better
Yes I do have all those preamps
 
I also have the Adcom 565 and is not as bad as the review, sounds really good too
The Citation 21 has a better line stage than any of all the preamp mentioned in the review
 
Which of them do you think has the best drive in the bass and rhytm abilities? What the brits call PRAT?

I thought the PT3 was equal to the other B&K preamps in a modern wrapping.
 
Which of them do you think has the best drive in the bass and rhytm abilities? What the brits call PRAT?

I thought the PT3 was equal to the other B&K preamps in a modern wrapping.
No the PT3 is not the same league of previous B&K preamp
 
The problem with the Halfer is that they are too old, they are going to need a restoration, in addition
the DH-200 and 220 are around same power as your BK, unless you go for a DH-500.
 
Still good preamp, the DH-100 is very basic and still good, I had one and sold it.


and here


I will take the DH-110 over the B&K PT3
 
But isn't the output soldered directly to a board like the early PRO5 with the golden handles?

I don't know about the PRO10.
The red and green faceplate with black handles were different right?

I mean both the DH100 and 110 have the same output layout as the early B&K?

They are a little prone to fail in my opinion.
 
Back
Top Bottom