• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

Bob Carver reply to questions/comments on his new Amazing Line Source speakers~

Status
Not open for further replies.

TNRabbit

TN boy languishing in MD
In response to the recent closed thread on Bob's new Amazing Line Source speakers---- (original CLOSED thread: http://audiokarma.org/forums/showthread.php?t=390387 )

Direct from Bob Carver's mouth:

Bob Carver here.

I've been reading the commentary on my new speaker and find the interest very exciting. Some of the comments I will address now.

One: It can't be done

My answer: Of course it can. Not only that, but I am used to being accused of inventing things that can't be done, beginning with the Phase Linear 700 watt amplifier of long ago, all the way to my current high-pressure subwoofer. So I'm used to that.

Two: The ribbon looks like it's from Parts Express

Of course it is. I designed that ribbon over thirteen years ago for a loudspeaker I ended up developing and calling the Sunfire Cinema Ribbon. The ribbon was built in China by Hi-Vi for Homni, my Chinese supplier for drivers at the time. Shortly thereafter I sold the design to Hi-Vi as part of a joint cooperation agreement for manufacturing tooling, and subsequently it was delivered into the public domain by my intent. Hi-Vi, under the joint cooperation agreement, markets it worldwide and now sells it to Parts Express. Again, it was originally designed for my Cinema Ribbon and is still used in Cinema Ribbons today. It is truly an amazing ribbon, if I do say so myself.

Three: 121dB SPL

121dB SPL is an enormous sound pressure level but the numbers that teach us how it does that are comprised of simple arithmetic. I begin: A pair of the small woofers as utilized in the tried-and-true Cinema Ribbons produce a loudspeaker that has a sensitivity of 89dB SPL. The Cinema Ribbon was designed to absorb all the power that my 200 watt per channel amplifier could deliver. At 80 Hz it's peak-to-peak excursion is 0.48". Now, my new Amazing Line Source speaker has 22 of these drivers per channel. Since each driver can take 100 watts (92 watts with crossover losses), how much can each Amazing Line Source speaker handle? Well, 92 x 22 is 2,024 watts. At those power levels and at 80 Hz, those woofers are moving back and forth 0.48". Or, from another point of view, 80Hz/4 (20 Hz) allows equalization and yields flat response down to 20 Hz with a 450 watt per channel amplifier, assuming a room gain of 8dB at 20 Hz (Theoretically it's 3dB per boundary, and there are three boundaries in a room for each speaker).

Four: Low Frequency Response

A line source that goes from floor to ceiling is a weird, spooky, and interesting thing. Imagine that your floor and ceiling are mirrors, and the line source has 22 candles instead of woofers. If we look at it, we will see candles going up infinitely to the sky and down infinitely below. The amazing thing is that each reflection of each candle generates real light and so do the reflected sound sources of the line array. Spooky because it seems as if it's something for nothing, and it almost is! The same holds true for the ribbons. Each ribbon, on speech and music, can easily absorb 200 watts rms and there are thirteen of them per channel. Finally, 200 watts x 13 = 2600 watts - a walk in the park for these ribbons!

Five: Sensitivity - 96dB

Each time the area or the displacement is doubled - all other things held constant - the sensitivity increases 6dB. Here is the arithmetic: One ribbon = 89dB. two ribbons = 95dB. Four ribbons = 101dB. Eight ribbons is 107dB, and 16 ribbons would be 113dB sensitivity IF the voltage across each were held constant. Since these ribbons are in a complex series/parallel configuration we must subtract 17dB because the voltage across each ribbon is substantially lower (approximately 20% of the original voltage) yielding 96dB SPL sensitivity. The precise calculation is as follows: There are thirteen ribbons, so 10 x log(13) is 11dB. 11 + 89 = 100dB, and the crossover throws away 4dB, for a net of 96dB sensitivity. That's the science.

Six: "Distortionless"

Strictly speaking, nothing is distortionless. However, in hi-fi, if the distortion is below our threshold of audibility we can color it gone. If it's gone we can't hear it and I consider it sufficiently distortionless to call it thus in my use of colloquial English.

Seven: "fast and loose with hyperbole"

I plead guilty for hyperbole, not guilty for fast and loose; my designs always deliver the performance and the numbers, for real, every time, as evidenced by independent reviewers over and over again through the years. Wait and see.

Thanks guys, your comments and passionate responses to this new loudspeaker have made me think.

Great comments, warmest and best,

Bob Carver
 
Last edited:
Register to hide this ad
Interesting info; thanks for posting it!

Floor to what height ceiling?

The speakers are 90 inches tall from what I have read.

With line arrays, as long as the speakers at the top and bottom ends are close enough to the ceiling and floor, the "coupling" effect will occur, just like mirrors, just as Bob Carver described. They need not go all the way; just sufficiently close. If those speakers are 90 inches tall, that's 7-1/2 feet, more than enough to couple effectively with a typical 8 or 9 foot ceiling. In the real world, coupling of speakers in line arrays doesn't meet the theoretical aims, because of factors like partial absorption by the ceiling and floor, the effects of air itself, etc... but it comes way close enough to sound pretty darned good!

:scratch2:...Interesting that those Parts Express ribbons are the same ones as in the Sunfire Cinemas... might be a bargain, at that!?
 
I do appreciate these responses which are clearly heartfelt and articulate. It's nice for a guy of his undeniable stature in this game to even bother with responding to a bunch of unwashed critics like me. I will disclose/confess that I run hot and cold in response to Mr. Carver's exploits over the years - back to and including the 700(B).

I am reminded of the poor treatment that James Bongornio received from the rabble at fmtunerinfo.com (although Mr. Bongornio doesn't suffer fools too gracefully), so I do hope we don't get involved in a urinating contest with Mr. Carver.

That said, am I the only one who detects a bit of a philosophical disconnect between these two responses?

Six: "Distortionless"

Strictly speaking, nothing is distortionless. However, in hi-fi, if the distortion is below our threshold of audibility we can color it gone. If it's gone we can't hear it and I consider it sufficiently distortionless to call it thus in my use of colloquial English.

Seven: "fast and loose with hyperbole"

I plead guilty for hyperbole, not guilty for fast and loose; my designs always deliver the performance and the numbers, for real, every time, as evidenced by independent reviewers over and over again through the years. Wait and see.

...

Great comments, warmest and best,

Bob Carver

If the numbers are indeed delivered, why no distortion numbers in this case? Col. Paul W. "no BS" Klipsch, for one, certainly had some strong opinions about the importance of low distortion (which, in Klipsch's analysis, is best achieved through low amounts of diaphragm excursion and letting horns do their work as acoustic transformers) in loudspeakers. My own approach to evaluation of loudspeakers - hobbyist that I am - is far more empirical ("suck it and see") than quantitative... but if one promises the numbers, one should feel duty bound to deliver the numbers.

Certainly fair enough to wait until a final configuration is established before publishing quantitative performance data on these loudspeakers.

BTW, I have no beef with the genesis of the tweeter. The little Peerless AlNiCo 2" cones (not to mention their KO10DT 1" silk domes) were cheap, but found employment in some fine and hardly inexpensive loudspeakers in their time.
 
Last edited:
Very cool to see answers to the questions posted on the site, and as predicted.. Bob likes the attention :)

It is interesting to hear that the ribbons were designed by Bob and are now distributed by PE. I have to chuckle after so many insisted they weren't. Now I really want to use/hear a pair!
 
Six: "Distortionless"

Strictly speaking, nothing is distortionless. However, in hi-fi, if the distortion is below our threshold of audibility we can color it gone. If it's gone we can't hear it and I consider it sufficiently distortionless to call it thus in my use of colloquial English.


Sophistry. No means no.
 
Nice to hear from Bob, clearing up some of the confusion in the prior speaker thread.

For me, some of the impact was lost with the reply being pasted here instead of Bob logging in and posting it.

That's just my opinion.

Murray
 
So, what about the best and most important question/comment - mine??? ;) What's the idea behind having so little of the midrange directly radiated, but all of the treble? Isn't the polar response bonkers? Isn't the entire frequency response radically altered by the location of the rear and side walls?
 
. . . What's the idea behind having so little of the midrange directly radiated, but all of the treble? Isn't the polar response bonkers? Isn't the entire frequency response radically altered by the location of the rear and side walls?

Good question. But since BC isn't in the thread we will probably have to wait till we hear it and let our ears sort it out.

I am confused at the configuration. It doesn't make sense.
 
Interesting that some of us were considered heretics for mentioning the similarities of the dayton planar magnetics because Bob couldn't possibly use something of that caliber, until Bob confirms they were the same.

I'll be the first to admit I was wrong. I never called anyone a heretic, just knew that Bob had designed the ribbon & I honestly didn't know it was the same one that PE sells now~ :D

Bob states the ribbons will easily accept 200 watts.

Here are some original posts:

My post: "Also, the parts express ribbons are nowhere close to the power handling of these ribbons. They are the same ones used in Sunfire's Cinema Ribbon speakers."

partial reply: "Why do you say that? The PE ribbons (planar magnetic, actually) are rated at 80W."

My reply: "The mid-woofers were custom-made in China to Bob's design specification. They have a custom copper-clad aluminum voice coil winding for increased speed & better thermal capacity.

To my knowledge, the ribbons were done the same way (custom in China). Perhaps the manufacturer sells them to Dayton Audio, I don't know. It was my understanding that the Sunfire ribbons were a higher wattage rating than the Dayton ribbons, but I can't confirm at this time."


SO...you can see my confusion....perhaps Dayton understates their capacity....
 
So . . . at this point can we move off finger pointing and name calling to discuss the attributes of the speaker?

I'm as curious as dumptruck about the positioning of the midranges. It baffles me. Phasing would seem to suffer but who knows? (none of us, none of us have heard these) I probably will not understand the reasoning but if it works, who cares!

Someone who gets to hear them post back.
 
So . . . at this point can we move off finger pointing and name calling to discuss the attributes of the speaker?

I'm as curious as dumptruck about the positioning of the midranges. It baffles me. Phasing would seem to suffer but who knows?

It may be as simple as the sides of the speaker are the only place to put the mids if the goal is a tall, narrow line source. A designer might think the bad effects (if any) of such placement are outweighed by the virtues of the narrow enclosure; one chooses one's compromises. Also note that designers are often adroit at turning compromises into advantages, making a virtue of necessity. For instance the side mounted mids might give a subjectively pleasing spaciousness to the sound, as with a Bose 901 say.
 
Last edited:
So . . . at this point can we move off finger pointing and name calling to discuss the attributes of the speaker?

I'm as curious as dumptruck about the positioning of the midranges. It baffles me. Phasing would seem to suffer but who knows? (none of us, none of us have heard these) I probably will not understand the reasoning but if it works, who cares!

Someone who gets to hear them post back.

It may be as simple as the sides of the speaker are the only place to put the mids if the goal is a tall, narrow line source. A designer might think the bad effects (if any) of such placement are outweighed by the virtues of the narrow enclosure; one chooses one's compromises. Also note that designers are often adroit at turning compromises into advantages, making a virtue of necessity. For instance the side mounted mids might give a subjectively pleasing spaciousness to the sound, as with a Bose 901 say.

These are very similar to the design of the Sunfire Cinema Ribbon s CRM-2 speakers, which sound WONDERFUL, especially for their size:


sunfire-crm-up-close-fig-1-lead-in.jpg
sunfire_spk_pg.jpg

CRM-2_5.jpg



So I'm sure the same (or similar) rules apply to the phase/polar mapping of the ALS, as they share quite similar side mounted woofers.
 
Last edited:
These are very similar to the design of the Sunfire Cinema Ribbon s CRM-2 speakers, which sound WONDERFUL, especially for their size...So I'm sure the same (or similar) rules apply to the phase/polar mapping of the ALS, as they share quite similar side mounted woofers.
Not really... those would put the listener between the two drivers, ~45 degrees off-axis from both. These new speakers would put the listener approx. on axis for the tweeters, while the woofers face the rear at two different angles.
 
Not only the room placement but the type of surfaces might have a large effect, then.

(Side note: if I ever actually had a clean, empty room to listen to a stereo in, I might actually hear the sound that a stereo is supposed to make... :D )
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom