• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

Bought a Sumiko Pearl today!

A cart needs time to break-in - usually about 50 hours, so any review of it prior to that is not fair to the cart. Although I think that a lot of break-in stories are BS for many components for carts it is true. The stylus assembly needs to be softened up by movement and the difference can be quite stunning.

True, but it's also more the case with some cartridges than others, and I don't think any of us knows how much better the Pearl will get, or how long it will take. Trower probably already has a very good sense of the "soul" of this cartridge, and from his descriptions it sounds like a great one.

The Grado sound on a non-Grado cartridge?! Isn't that another sign of the apocalypse? :yikes:
 
Well I thought I would post a quick update of how the cart is doing in my system. I sadly have been very busy as of late though so the cart has only about 15 hours on it, so it is far from being broken in.

But here a a few things I have noticed about this cart in general. First off I still miss my Grado, the midrange is very sweet on this cart, but its just not as sweet as the Grado's, Man to I love the Grado sound......but this is about the Pearl so I shall move on:D Second I have noticed the Pearl is not a very forgiving cart, it really brings out the flaws in any recording, and if the record is a digital master it is very evident. But I would not really hold that against it, but if you use it I would recommend a cart for your records that are not the best quality. Another thing I have noticed, but am not sure if its just because its not fully broken in, is that the highs seem a tad rolled off. Not badly, but just barley noticeable. One thing I love about the cart though so far is its reproduction of distorted guitars, and reproduction of horned instruments, both are spot on and very very open and realistic sounding, as if they were right here with me! Surface noise overall with this cart is not bad, but not good either, its not as bad as my Grados, but not as good as my Shibata equipped Audio Technica. The surface noise that is produced is not distracting or annoying, just a little more present, which I honestly kinda like. It does well with all music, like mentioned before, I really enjoy it with any type of brass instrument and with guitars, it also does well with any type of echo or distortion on vocals or any instrument, you can plainly tell how the music was recorded and if it was in a small dampened space, or a more open studio, or if the whole ensamble was recorded all together (my favorite). It really is a great cart!

As far as the sound changing, the only thing I have noticed is that the bass has gotten tigher and a little less bloated. It really has had a good sonic character since I first mounted it! Can't wait for it to fully break in:thmbsp:


Overall I could not be happier with the Pearl, it is well worth 100 bux, and probably well beyond that. It is a great bargain and a glimpse of what higher end carts draw from the groves:smoke:
 
Thanks for the update. I laughed when I read the part about how you miss your Grado because I've experienced that even when using cartridges that are much more serious performers than the Grado cartridges I own, as you know. Sounds like the Pearl was well-worth the money, and will be a wonderful extra cartridge to have on hand in the future. The rolled off highs you're noticing could just be the nature of the Pearl, it could also have something to do with your VTA and/or VTF settings - just a thought.
 
Thanks for the followup review Trower. As I posted here earlier, I too was considering the Sumiko as well but ended up with the AT440mla. And after many hours of happy listening, If I compare and contrast with my old Grado, I too sometimes miss that Grado sound, especially on the mint condition vinyl with bright to neutral mastering.
As someone reminded me recently, it's all about tradeoffs. One cart can't do it all. Especially at $100! And it does sound like it's doing most things right!
 
I've enjoyed reading the posts on this thread as I have been enjoying my recently out-of-retirement vinyl collection on a Sumiko Bluepoint from the early 90's. I was thinking of trading up to the BP No.2 for $180., but was curious how the Pearl might compare to the Bluepoint No.2 so maybe I could keep the BP original which "seems" to be okay.
 
I've enjoyed reading the posts on this thread as I have been enjoying my recently out-of-retirement vinyl collection on a Sumiko Bluepoint from the early 90's. I was thinking of trading up to the BP No.2 for $180., but was curious how the Pearl might compare to the Bluepoint No.2 so maybe I could keep the BP original which "seems" to be okay.

Not sure how that would work out, the Pearl should be a step down from the BP. However, if you're like me, you'll find just as much joy in using "budget" cartridges as you do with more expensive ones, in which case it would be worth it just for the experience. IMO the more cartridges one gets to hear, the better.
 
I own both the BP#2 and the Pearl (on two different tables). Obviously I am sold on the Sumiko "house sound", and think they are the best band for the buck. The bloated lows and rolled off highs sound like a VTa issue to me. The Sumiko's are very fussy for VTa, and even the slightest adjustment yeilds glorious, or disasterous results. The VTF is also fussy on these carts. They spec a max of 2 grams, and they should have said "track at 2 grams". They like the heavier tracking so don't be shy.

The BP#2 is in the same family of sound, but it is a pearl without the heavy wool blanket over your speakers. The highs are dynamic and crisp, and the lows are tight and powerful. The midrange is far more extended and a bit more forward, and the soundstage is 10 times wider (symphonic performances are unreal as they are so real!!) The BP#2 is the lowest line of their MC carts, and they only get better from there...but I wouldn't trade my BP#2 since it's been the best match for my SME3009-II I have found yet. I have tried the V-15 III and the Ortofon SPU (both hailed as the wonder match to the early SME's) and the BP#2 spanks both of them on that arm.

Enjoy your Pearl, but fiddle a bit with the VTa and VTF...they really yeild apparent results with the smallest of adjustments.

James R.
 
Well after reading the comments about my issues with the cart I decided to start from scratch. I resetup everything, I used a Stevenson protractor, set the VTA to flat (neither tail up or down), and set the VTF to 2.1 (after reading about it liking the max or even higher) and upon first listen I knew that there was something wrong with the setup before, the cart now sounded just perfect! The highs were no longer rolled off (well as good as could be expected from a 100$ cart) and the bass was more controlled. I really think though that it was due to the VTF of 1.75 not being enough......Sumiko really needs to give a better tracking force recommendation! And further adjustments to the VTA showed were I frist set it was optimal, though I did find it was not as small of a "sweet" spot as a Grado for VTA:D

It is really a great cart, I am liking it more each day. I still miss the Grado sound, but I think I may just have to make another arm for one, I don't know if I could due without my Pearl:thmbsp:

Heres a couple pics of the cart.
scaled.php


scaled.php
 
Good for you, and nice pics! The Sumiko certainly makes the rounds on my tables, and its makes for a very enjoyable listen whenever I give it a spin. I don't think there's any one thing that stands out on this cartridge that would make me say: "Wow, the bass is the best I've heard", though it has very good if not hugely articulate bass. Or, "Wow, the highs are the best I've heard", though the highs are pleasant and not spitty or screechy, but its not the most extended cartridge in the high end that I've heard. Its not that kind of cartridge.

What it doesn't do is make you notice it in any way that detracts/distracts from the listening experience. It just jumps down into the groove and pulls out music in a way that is very listenable and very enjoyable. I don't have any tracking issues with it, nothing in the inner grooves that bugs me. The Sumiko just gets out of the music's way and plays.

Enjoy your Pearl!
 
Trower, glad you seem to be warming up to that Pearl very nicely, and thanks for your comments and pics. This is just right the kind of information a new Pearl buyer would find so helpful in setting up their cartridge to get the most out of it. :thmbsp:
 
Yes thanks for the pictures Trower, you know I always like to see what everyone's talking about, regardless of how many stock photos there are on the internet. It's just not the same.
 
Now I NEED to find me another Pioneer headstock! I'm now wanting to give this cart a try over the V15 RS. Too bad it doesn't have a stabilizer brush, that's one of the things I like about the V15.
 
Okay, reviving an older thread here. I've had my Pearl for a few days now, and have about 20 hours on it, and I am gratified to find my impressions similar to the above. Most of all, I think the cartridge's real strength is that it doesn't have any glaring weaknesses; that is a good thing in its price range. Highs are extended, crisp, and detailed, but without the sibilance issues you often get with cheaper cartridges - sometimes I think that some of the 30 and 40 buck cartridges would be pretty decent if they did roll off a bit. While I wouldn't go quite so far as to call the mids lush, I do find them fairly uncolored, with the ability to resolve instruments well - not congested. The lowest bass a bit soft, perhaps, but tightens up quickly above that, is my experience. Of course, my TD-165 doesn't allow me to experiment with VTA, but I have done some by using various mats.

I didn't listen to vinyl for years, but a decade or two ago I had another TD-165 upon which were mounted various cartridges such as Stanton 681EEE-S, 881-S, and some high-end Signets whose model numbers escape me, but were near the top of the line. This Pearl is embarassed by none of those combinations, as I recall. Vinyl is suddenly my main source of music again, and it sounds great. Very good cartridge, mates well with Thorens' 16.5 gr tonearms.
 
Okay, reviving an older thread here. I've had my Pearl for a few days now, and have about 20 hours on it, and I am gratified to find my impressions similar to the above. Most of all, I think the cartridge's real strength is that it doesn't have any glaring weaknesses; that is a good thing in its price range. Highs are extended, crisp, and detailed, but without the sibilance issues you often get with cheaper cartridges - sometimes I think that some of the 30 and 40 buck cartridges would be pretty decent if they did roll off a bit. While I wouldn't go quite so far as to call the mids lush, I do find them fairly uncolored, with the ability to resolve instruments well - not congested. The lowest bass a bit soft, perhaps, but tightens up quickly above that, is my experience. Of course, my TD-165 doesn't allow me to experiment with VTA, but I have done some by using various mats.

I didn't listen to vinyl for years, but a decade or two ago I had another TD-165 upon which were mounted various cartridges such as Stanton 681EEE-S, 881-S, and some high-end Signets whose model numbers escape me, but were near the top of the line. This Pearl is embarassed by none of those combinations, as I recall. Vinyl is suddenly my main source of music again, and it sounds great. Very good cartridge, mates well with Thorens' 16.5 gr tonearms.


Being well-rounded is a great quality, it sounds like a very nice cartridge. BTW, are you positive that you can't adjust the VTA on your TD-165? I only ask because many months went by after I got my TD125 MKII before I realized that I could in fact adjust the VTA via a tiny hex screw on the back of the tonearm base. That made the turntable more useful to me, especially with more VTA sensitive cartridges.
 
Okay, Mr. Lin, I see two set-screws on the collar at the base of the TP-11 mounts. One is to the back of the 'table, the other is opposite the platter-side of the cartridge, ie, to the right as you face the 'table; ninety degrees apart, same plane. Although Thorens mentions setting VTA in their user manuals by inserting spacers in the headshell, no mention is made of these two screws, but it certainly appears they would indeed do the job.

Haven't tried them yet, but probably will soon. Thanks for the headsup.
 
I've not owned the AT440ML, but I've never had issues with inner groove tracking with my Pearl on either my Technics 1210 M5G or my Pioneer PL-600.
 
Okay, Mr. Lin, I see two set-screws on the collar at the base of the TP-11 mounts. One is to the back of the 'table, the other is opposite the platter-side of the cartridge, ie, to the right as you face the 'table; ninety degrees apart, same plane. Although Thorens mentions setting VTA in their user manuals by inserting spacers in the headshell, no mention is made of these two screws, but it certainly appears they would indeed do the job.

Haven't tried them yet, but probably will soon. Thanks for the headsup.

I hope that works for you. Are they hex screws?
 
Back
Top Bottom