• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

BSR 610: A Low-Key Good Turntable?

Stack

Active Member
This is a post about a BSR 610 I recently thrifted, and how to me it seems to defy the normal rule of BSRs.

I saw this thing at the thrift store for $15, and it sat for two weeks before I bought it. At first glance it looks like any old "El Cheapo" BSR deck. Given that I already own much better decks, I walked by with hardly a second glance because I don't have any need for those in my life.

20250819_204239.jpg

The third time passing it by, I actually took a good look at it, and that's when my curiosity piqued. first thing I saw was that unlike any other BSR I'd ever seen, this one had bespoke controls for tracking force and antiskate, not dissimilar to the ones on my Miracord:

20250826_093729.jpg

Once I actually had it open, the next thing I noticed was that it had a (relatively) heavy cast aluminum platter which was effectively silenced with a rubber mat fused down to it. This was something that smacked of at least some sort of effort to make a good sounding turntable, which is not what I'm used tonseeing from BSR. This was enough to get me to cough up the $15, because now I wanted to see if it was actually a capable performer, and something I could recommend as a decent budget turntable option.

20250818_120439.jpg

The most amazing thing was that after plugging it in, it seemed to be mostly working. The platter wasn't frozen as is the default on BSRs, the automatic mechanisms were functioning, and everything turned nice and free. I'm not sure if it landed at the thrift store recently serviced or they used better lubricants on this model, but it only needed minimal work to get going to some capacity and then a bit more to get going well: cleaning the contacts on the cartridge sled and replacing the original RCA cables were enough to fix the dodgy left channel and play some beater records.

Further looking around and internet research showed that this table is outfitted with a 4 pole motor and has no issues with taking a moving magnet cartridge tracking down to 2 grams (1.5 by some accounts.) It's also outfitted with an interchangeable cartridge sled. Genuinely nice features that I never thought I'd see on a BSR.

20250826_093714.jpg

When I first started doing tests on it, things weren't looking great from a performance standpoint. it had the signature BSR "plays 2% too fast" sickness, and wow and flutter tested at .4%, which is hardly acceptable. However, with a little sandpaper on the pulley, letting it run for a little while, burnishing the idler tire and a couple drops of light machine oil in the right spots, I had the speed to within half a percent (not noticeable to me) and wow and flutter down to between .1‐.2% depending on the speed (I found a contemporary review if the table and this was as good as it ever got.)

Still not class leading, but the wow was only really noticeable on sustained piano notes and harmonica for me. It otherwise sounded genuinely good: relatively quiet with low rumble and decent soundstage and stereo seperation.

20250819_204300.jpg

In a fully serviced state, I would say that the BSR 610 is solidly good. is it the best turntable ever? No, not even close. My Miracord runs circles around it in speed accuracy, wow and flutter percentages (typically .04% RMS) and general build quality. This is to say nothing of the specs and performance on a Technics SL1200 or other high end quartz locked direct drive. At the same time, I've had many, much worse tables in my life. If I didn't have the Miracord, I'd probably be very content with the quality of this BSR as my "changer/78 deck."

I'd still love to do away with the cheesy 1970s plastic base, but that's eminently doable. they made better bases for BSR mechanisms and they're also not a very difficult woodworking project. The overarm is also a bit annoying, but not so much where the table is unusable. Mine is also missing the changer spindle, but this thing runs the most common BSR changer mechanism, so if I wanted it I could get one for cheap (or free if I was patient.)

Overall I think that this specific model of BSR represents an amazing value for somebody looking for a decent table, or somebody morbidly curious about owning a record changer. It's crazy to me how cheap these go for given the relative quality put into them, but then again I passed it up twice at $15 since it looks like much cheaper decks, so maybe it's not so crazy?

Maybe the lesson here is that there are exceptions to every rule, and looking where nobody else is is how you can still find value in the increasingly saturated turntable market. There's still some good deals out there. If you're willing to be seen with the BSR badge in your home and giving a ling exanation about how this isn't like the other ones to every audio person who comes into your house, this is one.
 
Register to hide this ad
This is a post about a BSR 610 I recently thrifted, and how to me it seems to defy the normal rule of BSRs.

I saw this thing at the thrift store for $15, and it sat for two weeks before I bought it. At first glance it looks like any old "El Cheapo" BSR deck. Given that I already own much better decks, I walked by with hardly a second glance because I don't have any need for those in my life.

View attachment 3582041

The third time passing it by, I actually took a good look at it, and that's when my curiosity piqued. first thing I saw was that unlike any other BSR I'd ever seen, this one had bespoke controls for tracking force and antiskate, not dissimilar to the ones on my Miracord:

View attachment 3582043

Once I actually had it open, the next thing I noticed was that it had a (relatively) heavy cast aluminum platter which was effectively silenced with a rubber mat fused down to it. This was something that smacked of at least some sort of effort to make a good sounding turntable, which is not what I'm used tonseeing from BSR. This was enough to get me to cough up the $15, because now I wanted to see if it was actually a capable performer, and something I could recommend as a decent budget turntable option.

View attachment 3582044

The most amazing thing was that after plugging it in, it seemed to be mostly working. The platter wasn't frozen as is the default on BSRs, the automatic mechanisms were functioning, and everything turned nice and free. I'm not sure if it landed at the thrift store recently serviced or they used better lubricants on this model, but it only needed minimal work to get going to some capacity and then a bit more to get going well: cleaning the contacts on the cartridge sled and replacing the original RCA cables were enough to fix the dodgy left channel and play some beater records.

Further looking around and internet research showed that this table is outfitted with a 4 pole motor and has no issues with taking a moving magnet cartridge tracking down to 2 grams (1.5 by some accounts.) It's also outfitted with an interchangeable cartridge sled. Genuinely nice features that I never thought I'd see on a BSR.

View attachment 3582045

When I first started doing tests on it, things weren't looking great from a performance standpoint. it had the signature BSR "plays 2% too fast" sickness, and wow and flutter tested at .4%, which is hardly acceptable. However, with a little sandpaper on the pulley, letting it run for a little while, burnishing the idler tire and a couple drops of light machine oil in the right spots, I had the speed to within half a percent (not noticeable to me) and wow and flutter down to between .1‐.2% depending on the speed (I found a contemporary review if the table and this was as good as it ever got.)

Still not class leading, but the wow was only really noticeable on sustained piano notes and harmonica for me. It otherwise sounded genuinely good: relatively quiet with low rumble and decent soundstage and stereo seperation.

View attachment 3582049

In a fully serviced state, I would say that the BSR 610 is solidly good. is it the best turntable ever? No, not even close. My Miracord runs circles around it in speed accuracy, wow and flutter percentages (typically .04% RMS) and general build quality. This is to say nothing of the specs and performance on a Technics SL1200 or other high end quartz locked direct drive. At the same time, I've had many, much worse tables in my life. If I didn't have the Miracord, I'd probably be very content with the quality of this BSR as my "changer/78 deck."

I'd still love to do away with the cheesy 1970s plastic base, but that's eminently doable. they made better bases for BSR mechanisms and they're also not a very difficult woodworking project. The overarm is also a bit annoying, but not so much where the table is unusable. Mine is also missing the changer spindle, but this thing runs the most common BSR changer mechanism, so if I wanted it I could get one for cheap (or free if I was patient.)

Overall I think that this specific model of BSR represents an amazing value for somebody looking for a decent table, or somebody morbidly curious about owning a record changer. It's crazy to me how cheap these go for given the relative quality put into them, but then again I passed it up twice at $15 since it looks like much cheaper decks, so maybe it's not so crazy?

Maybe the lesson here is that there are exceptions to every rule, and looking where nobody else is is how you can still find value in the increasingly saturated turntable market. There's still some good deals out there. If you're willing to be seen with the BSR badge in your home and giving a ling exanation about how this isn't like the other ones to every audio person who comes into your house, this is one.
I almost got this model in the 70's. It had some nice features and the price was right for a changer. I always like BSR turntables. My late wife had a 310x, with a Shure M93 cartridge, in 1971. She, like me, took very good care of her records. I still play some from her library and they sound excellent. I know some people don't care for BSR turntables, but they will serve you well as long as you take care of your vinyl records. Congratulations, and enjoy.
 
Addendum: I've tracked down the changer spindle for this table, and... I think I'd maybe leave that functionality be.

My impression from youtube videos and other people's experiences was that this mechanism was supposed to be reliable on BSRs, but mine might need some tweaking: I've gotten quite a few late drops and double drops in my testing. It also just feels a little bit janky overall.

I would say that in my experience, the umbrella style drop changer mechanism feels way more reliable and far less precarious than the overarm style. Again, I'll probably want to go over the table and make sure it's nothing wrong with this one specifically, buy if it's not just my table and this was the standard drop changer experience most people had in the 1970s, I can understand the apprehension about using drop changers that most baby boomer aged people seem to have now.

For reference, the changer mechanism on my Miracord is reliable enough to where I'd trust it to not malfunction bad enough to damage my records while I'm not in the room. This table? In it's current state? Less so.

Doesn't change the solid performance I've been getting from this turntable as a single play machine though. I'd still recommend using it in that capacity.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom