Maxamillion
Super Member
So I picked up a bunch of assorted EMIM/EMIT parts from the auction place - two neo EMIMs and four SmCo EMIMs w/o diaphragms, along with two EMITs with bad diaphragms. I was able to get one good neo EMIM out of the two (minus corroded/detached magnets), so my RSIIbs now have a complete neo set (yeah!). All the SmCo EMIMs are fine, as they don't corrode.
Just out of curiosity I did an experiment to see the relative strength of the neo vs SmCo magnets. On my EMIM jig, I suspended the front plate over the back plate for each of the EMIMs and measured the gaps with the top plate level. The neos all had a gap between the plates of 3/4", while the SmCos all had a gap of 9/16"; it was a noticable difference, and remarkably consistent. The force required to push the plates together was also noticably higher with the neos. I would guess the stronger field would translate into higher efficiency and a bit lower range for the neos.
Just thought you might want to know...
Just out of curiosity I did an experiment to see the relative strength of the neo vs SmCo magnets. On my EMIM jig, I suspended the front plate over the back plate for each of the EMIMs and measured the gaps with the top plate level. The neos all had a gap between the plates of 3/4", while the SmCos all had a gap of 9/16"; it was a noticable difference, and remarkably consistent. The force required to push the plates together was also noticably higher with the neos. I would guess the stronger field would translate into higher efficiency and a bit lower range for the neos.
Just thought you might want to know...
. It may not make much difference in sound - the higher field strength may just make then a little more efficient. I believe though that in the EMIMs, the higher field of the neos extends their lower cutoff point a bit, allowing them to mesh with the woofers a little better.