• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

Crossover coil saturation

AVergison

New Member
Hello,

A part of my active 3-way speaker system is a 15" woofer (500 W) passively crossed over to a 6.5" mid (200 W) around 250 Hz, both 8 ohms. I was initially using a LR2 with two 10 mH ferrite core coils and two 39 uF capacitors in two LC circuits.

The fun begun when testing with tone bursts. At rather higher volume level (don't worry, I'm carrying ear protectors) I noticed a kind of rattle occurring below the crossover frequency. That made me think of bad speaker fastening. However, nothing felt loose, so I thought it would be the next logical step to check how the coils behaved.

It quickly turned out (by visualizing using a scope) that the woofer section coil entered saturation, so I purchased a 10 mH iron core toroid (donut) with low DC resistance replacing it, and results became better but not quite satisfactory.

As the toroid had a specification of 1,500 watts I decided to set up an extremely simple test as follows:
upload_2019-10-26_21-53-50.png

The oscilloscope was a single channel MBLE BEM-005 5 Mhz device (tubes only), dated, but still working normally. It's actually a remnant of my youth some 40 years ago...
The audio amplifier driving the circuit was a single channel of a DAP CX-2100 rated 2x 700 Watt RMS into 8 ohms and 2x 990 Watt RMS into 4 ohms.
The load consisted of eight resistors of 8 ohms / 50 Watt configured as a 4 ohms / 400 Watt load.
The input were sine bursts with a duty cycle of 20 percent (1 second of signal per 5 seconds).
The test input was a sine of 80 V peak, corresponding to some 800 W into 4 ohms.

I fed the circuit with 8 frequencies from 22 up to 270 Hz and here's the output I got: (taken with my mobile)

upload_2019-10-26_22-2-30.png
From left to right: input signal - 270 - 220 - 180 - 150 - 120 - 100 - 82 - 68 - 56 - 47 - 39 - 33 - 22 (twice, different time base) Hz.
The scale of the pics is 20 V/division.

It is clear that severe distortion shows up as of 150 Hz downwards.

For those who have interest, here are some signals measured over the coil:
upload_2019-10-26_21-58-3.png

The scale of the upper four pics is 20 V/division, the lower pics have 10V/division.

Next test, and IMHO way more interesting, is a DUAL tone signal with 22 and 660 Hz of equal intensity.
The idea is that the 22 Hz passes virtually without attenuation, but the 660 Hz is attenuated with around 20 dB. We should see the big 22 Hz sine with a small 660 Hz ripple.

Here's what happens whenever the momentary voltage exceeds 40 volts:

upload_2019-10-26_22-11-30.png

The small ripple is fine in the areas between + and - 40 volts. However, above 40 volts the iron core goes into saturation and is no longer a core. The coil becomes an air coil. Hence the inductance severely drops and the 660 Hz isn't attenuated anymore. What is especially bad is that the 660 Hz signal breaks through at the outer top and bottom sides in an asymmetrical way, causing a severe distortion.

After this experience I was wondering why vendors of coils with ferrite or iron cores don't provide saturation current as an indication of the limit of usability of the coil. The said toroid costing 50+ euros had a spec of 1,500 watts, suggesting that it could be used with drivers up to that power. In reality saturation starts at a current of 40 volts / 4 ohms = 10 amps, meaning something around 200 to 250 watts sine, only !!! Anything of input above that level will cause the woofer to receive heavily distorted midrange signals, and given the fact that the woofer has a 1,000 watts peak spec that just means that the crossover becomes totally unusable.

For now I didn't mention brands and part numbers, on purpose, we can always go into more detail later on. But I wanted to learn why inductors are enveloped in so much mysterious haze, up to becoming a cult, and about no vendor dares to tell what there products really are capable of. IMHO the maximum current before some given percentage of distortion (say 5 or 10 percent) is about all what counts, besides the DC resistance. I don't catch why vendors do specify maximum power (if they do). Into how many ohms? 2, 4, 8 or 16 ?

Oh, and how about the initial ferrite coils? Well, they started saturating at around 20 volts... or some 50 watts! Totally useless in the woofer section, ALTHOUGH I kept them in the mid sections as the peak current is way lower, and no noticeable distortion occurs.

Any similar experiences from you guys? I'm waiting for it before doing anything more with the woofer section coil. But I'm already seriously considering air coils, even if they are more costly and bulky.

Thanks,
Andre
 
Register to hide this ad
A toroid with no air gap is going to saturate pretty abruptly. Most steel core inductors for crossover use are bar shaped.

Great job on sharing measurements of an important parameter! All the more reason for active biamping instead of passive XO's.
 
Thanks. Originally the 15" covered 80...1200 Hz then an Altec 811B horn with BMS 4550 takes over. Active crossover. But the resulting lobing didn't please me so I mounted 6.5" somewhere in between, as close to the 811B as possible. As my dbx Driverack PA2 only has 3 channels I had to insert a passive crossover (250 Hz).
 
The toroid vendor explained that it does have a gap, to get better results indeed. Nevertheless saturation starts at around 200 watts into 4 ohms, equivalent to 400 watts into 8 ohms. ( P = R * I^2 )
Still no 1,500 watts though.
 
Iron cores get nasty when they saturate. Tube amps do the same thing when you hit the transformer's limits and its relatively abrupt too. I suspect thats why a lot of speaker builders suggest air cores. Much larger of course, and completely impractical at large inductance and high power levels though.

Does it clean up any if you parallel a cap across the load resistor?
 
Your measurements confirm that inductors have limits and in this case the limit is 400W into 8 ohms. How loud do you want these speakers to be? Is this for a PA in the world's largest stadium?
 
@gadget73, wil include this in next tests

@rothwellaudio, a stadium line array easily digests multiple tens of kilowatts. No no, I'm searching for powerful, dynamic, clean sound for an indoor audience of a few hundreds of people, or for small outdoor events. A 100 watt cabinet looks great and often will do fine. However if you want 'only' 6 dB more volume than you need 400 watts. Increase by another 6 dB and then all of a sudden you require 1,600 watts. No, the average level shouldn't be that high, but peaks should get through as cleanly as possible. Here's where the said coil distortion comes in.

Add to the above that for outdoor the baffle step syndrome requires up to 6 dB in the low mids and lows...

The point is that I wish to know what the real coil limits are.
My today's impression is that there exist three kinds of coil power specifications: equivalent speaker power 1/ before saturation (distortion), 2/ before overheating (thermal power limit), and 3/ no spec at all. Either power rating should be given along with the impedance ( e.g. 8 ohms).

IMHO the saturation limit is the important one. By the time a coil overheats you'll sure have lived a speaker meltdown so thermal limits seem useless.
 
@rothwellaudio, a stadium line array easily digests multiple tens of kilowatts. No no, I'm searching for powerful, dynamic, clean sound for an indoor audience of a few hundreds of people, or for small outdoor events.
My mistake, I didn't realise this was intended for much larger audience than 2 or 3 people in a domestic living room, sorry.
The point is that I wish to know what the real coil limits are.
My today's impression is that there exist three kinds of coil power specifications: equivalent speaker power 1/ before saturation (distortion), 2/ before overheating (thermal power limit), and 3/ no spec at all. Either power rating should be given along with the impedance ( e.g. 8 ohms).

IMHO the saturation limit is the important one. By the time a coil overheats you'll sure have lived a speaker meltdown so thermal limits seem useless.
Yes, I agree, component specifications are often inadequate, particularly where crossover coils are concerned.
 
@turboyam : air coil: no distortion whatsoever; I used a 1.8 mH / 0.4 ohms coil with dual 120 and 1800 Hz signal, the output stays clean (small 1800 Hz ripple on the base 120 Hz) all the time, full amp output!

@gadget73 : adding a cap over the resistor (same one as used in the target LC circuit, 250 Hz) has a small effect, but distortion remains distortion; the higher the frequency the more effect, but far from taking away the distortion, no doubt about that.

I created dual tone using my smartphone: simply open two tabs in your browser loaded with https://www.szynalski.com/tone-generator/ and there you go. Link can be either bluetooth or speaker output.

If you don't have a scope then you could listen at the signal across the resistor load, preferably via a resistor bridge to attenuate the big voltages.
 
@turboyam : air coil: no distortion whatsoever; I used a 1.8 mH / 0.4 ohms coil with dual 120 and 1800 Hz signal, the output stays clean (small 1800 Hz ripple on the base 120 Hz) all the time, full amp output!

@gadget73 : adding a cap over the resistor (same one as used in the target LC circuit, 250 Hz) has a small effect, but distortion remains distortion; the higher the frequency the more effect, but far from taking away the distortion, no doubt about that.

I created dual tone using my smartphone: simply open two tabs in your browser loaded with https://www.szynalski.com/tone-generator/ and there you go. Link can be either bluetooth or speaker output.

If you don't have a scope then you could listen at the signal across the resistor load, preferably via a resistor bridge to attenuate the big voltages.
Thank you so much! this confirms what i thought. Had a bid discussion with Kenrick, the Japanese JBL refurb. guy. Don't get me wrong, he does awesome
work! but insists that the air cores are no better then what he uses...
 
Much larger of course, and completely impractical at large inductance and high power levels though.

Late to the party, and probably not intellectually equipped for it, so have mercy on me if this is a bogus question at this point, but...

Doesn't the quoted point suggest that this quest screams for a passive-crossover tri-amp solution?

Cheers,

chazix
 
A passive-crossover tri-amp solution? (You meant active?) You're right. Well, my start was a three way speaker system driven by a dbx Driverack PA2 three way active cross over (sufwoofer + low/mid + high) and associated amps. Now I wanted to split the 15" driver low/midrange (80...1200 Hz) into two bands 80...250 and 250...1200 Hz and feed the hi band to a 6.5" mid mounted as close as possible to the HF horn, in order to reduce lobing. Here's where the passive crossover comes in.

The only way to stay fully active, that I know of, is cascading the Driverack with an active two way crossover. Could do that to split off the subwoofer. But then I loose some management functionality such as limiters and equalizers. In addition, the cabling to the top units then becomes unpractical: 3 pairs, rather then 2 pairs implemented by simple 4-wire cable and standard Neutrik 4-pin connectors.

Having written that, Danley Sound Labs also use passive crossovers for their high power multi-way Synergy speakers. The pic below should show a three way Danley SH50 ( https://www.danleysoundlabs.com/products/loud-speakers/synergy-horn/sh50/ ) with top removed:

upload_2019-11-2_18-21-37.png
(from https://www.diyaudio.com/forums/multi-way/309258-correct-understanding-synergy-horns-2.html )

The SH50 power rating is 1,000 watts continuous, 4,000 watts peak...
 
Back
Top Bottom