jhoyt
Incomprehensible space llama
FWIW, I have Vandersteen 2ce speakers right next to DQ-20s. Both have been gently massaged for better performance. They are very close in performance, as they came from the same era and same design ethos. The biggest differences are in the crossover (1st order (V) vs. 2nd order (DQ)), tweeter (AL dome (V) vs. silk dome (DQ)), and bass alignment (passive radiator (V) vs. sealed (DQ)). The similarities are 3-way, minimal baffle, midrange and tweeter separated from the woofer, and time aligned drivers.DQ 20 verses a Vandersteen 2c??
Performance wise, they are very similar. Bass depth goes to the Vandersteens, I think because of the passive (actually quasi-passive) radiator alignment. It is very sophisticated, with the passive having its own circuitry included in the crossover. I can hear a 30Hz tone, but not from the DQ-20s. They do play into the mid-30's though. The quality of bass is very similar from both speakers. Their nonlinearities are largely a result of the room they're in. Midrange and treble goes to the DQ-20's, again by a hair. The Vandersteens sound great in this regard by themselves, but against the DQs a bit of harshness is revealed.
I suspect that against modern speakers of similar price and design ethos both of these speakers would have their shortcomings revealed. But for what they are, you really can't go wrong with either. And I agree that they both are in a league above any DCM speaker.