YessirI'll sleep better at night with audiofreaks on patrol.![]()
Audiofreak71
YessirI'll sleep better at night with audiofreaks on patrol.![]()
the Samsung 165W per channel, yet the DH-220 far out performs in shear power and sound? Also curious why the Samsung states 70W/120VAC (with multiple 165W outputs for 5.1 surround) and the DH-220 states 840W/120VAC,
Those are power input from the wall, but thats your answer. You cannot have more power output than you have input, so if a device wants 70w of power consumption, its not going to have greater than 70w total output to the speakers.
Speaker power output ratings can be done in a number of ways. The Hafler would have conformed to the old FTC (Federal Trade Commission) standards which were pretty much a torture test. It also gives extremely conservative ratings. That 115 wpc channel rating will be both channels driven for an extended period with the amp already hot and still below some max distortion number. Its an absolute worst-case scenario that most people will never see. I expect if you tried to rate the Samsung under the same conditions you'd be closer to 15 watts per channel. In stereo mode you might be closer to 25, but its not going to exceed power input.
Thank you. That's interesting. I've always wondered about the AC power input specs on modern stereo's. Never made sense to me how more watts were going out than coming in. A friend said the UL plate generally lists the "average" power that a consumer device will typically use. To me the DH220 845W AC load with 2x115W output makes sense. The 70W AC load with 1000W total speaker output doesn't make sense at all. Reading the specs one would think the Samsung was superior, but it's obviously not. I wonder if there is a testing/rating document that describes how they come up with the numbers?
Bottom line is power can and is measured and spec'ed a number of ways. Sometimes companies try to "look better" by specs but really specs are just one part of it. Look at the weight, the size of the transformer, and the heat sinks on the Hafler - that will tell you something.
The Hafller 220 is a great piece of equipment. I built one back in 1982 and I still have it. If yours has all original parts then by now it is operating at just a fraction of its original capability. I would strongly recommend replacing the main filter caps at a minimum.
My has been completely modified from top to bottom with Musical Concepts mod kits. i still use it and it is much better with the mod kits installed. DO NOT sell this amp. Instead build your system around it and then down the road considering upgrading amp itself. A modified Hafler will outperform a lot of newer gear.

You'll fit in just fine around here, that's how a lot of us got our start. I found a free broken vintage receiver on Freecycle early one morning, and learned at AK that it was a pretty special monster receiver and I should get it fixed up. That was 2005. I still have the receiver, BTW. Probably never part with it.
Oh, BTW, the power supply in a receiver can hold a bit of extra juice so it is capable of putting out a peak higher than its continuous power capability. That's what they call 'headroom'. The more robust a power supply is, the more reserve it has for peaks in the music. There are cheap theater in the box systems rated at 1000W output but only 100W input. They can only do 1000W for a fraction of a second, or as we like to say, 'if lightning strikes'. That's an extreme case but it gives you an idea how some of those power ratings can be manipulated.
I have a Hafler much like yours and it plays for 5-10 sec after I turn it off. Reserves!
I have an inexpensive RIAA preamp I bought on Amazon with a level out and volume adjustment for headphones. That's what I used to control the volume. I initially had it pretty high and got quite a loud surprise when I turned on the DH220.There's no mention of a pre-amp. Just wondering what is between the turntable and the Hafler amp. OP states that he connected the turntable and speakers to the Hafler amp.
This photo is the little inexpensive preamp I bought. Not top of the line, but it gets the job done for the turntable RIAA curve.There's no mention of a pre-amp. Just wondering what is between the turntable and the Hafler amp. OP states that he connected the turntable and speakers to the Hafler amp.
Hello all. I'm very much a typical off-the-shelf home audio person, but trying to learn a few more things to improve my system. I have a basic Samsung HT-D5300 home theater system. Over the years I have acquired various Cerwin Vega speakers that have replaced the little plastic ones that came with the system. To my ears it has been a vast improvement. Recently I had the opportunity to purchase a DH-220 stereo power amp. It needed minor repair so I got a really good deal. Connecting it to my turntable via RIAA preamp I was absolutely stunned at the response and raw power it delivered. It made the Samsung sound very weak by comparison.
Here's the question: How is it that the DH-220 delivers 115W per channel, the Samsung 165W per channel, yet the DH-220 far out performs in shear power and sound? Also curious why the Samsung states 70W/120VAC (with multiple 165W outputs for 5.1 surround) and the DH-220 states 840W/120VAC, yet the Samsung specs imply more power to the speakers and sounds weaker? Is this related to the DH being linear power supply and all analog while the Samsung is switching amps and power supply?
Any help in understanding this would be greatly appreciated. Please pardon me if I used any incorrect terms in my descriptions.
This should be enough to teach you not to buy on specs, or rely on them for describing sound quality.
LOTS of AK'ers are overly enamored with specifications. Some specs are good for determining compatibility or suitability for a purpose, but most do not correlate with sound quality, unfortunately.
The Hafler has had an excellent reputation for 40 years. Of course buying by reputation has its pitfalls too, but only the snootiest audiophiles would diss the Hafler. And they would be wrong.
Congratulations!
There is a school of thought in this hobby that might be called minimalism, which maintains that the less cluttered the signal path is, the better.
You're there.![]()
Hello all. I'm very much a typical off-the-shelf home audio person, but trying to learn a few more things to improve my system. I have a basic Samsung HT-D5300 home theater system. Over the years I have acquired various Cerwin Vega speakers that have replaced the little plastic ones that came with the system. To my ears it has been a vast improvement. Recently I had the opportunity to purchase a DH-220 stereo power amp. It needed minor repair so I got a really good deal. Connecting it to my turntable via RIAA preamp I was absolutely stunned at the response and raw power it delivered. It made the Samsung sound very weak by comparison.
Here's the question: How is it that the DH-220 delivers 115W per channel, the Samsung 165W per channel, yet the DH-220 far out performs in shear power and sound? Also curious why the Samsung states 70W/120VAC (with multiple 165W outputs for 5.1 surround) and the DH-220 states 840W/120VAC, yet the Samsung specs imply more power to the speakers and sounds weaker? Is this related to the DH being linear power supply and all analog while the Samsung is switching amps and power supply?
Any help in understanding this would be greatly appreciated. Please pardon me if I used any incorrect terms in my descriptions.
I don't understand how I got to a point where I have to prove that I have this thing and my comments are genuine but here are some pics. I can photograph my speakers and Samsung too if necessary.
Lol a few weeks ago I didn't even know what an RIAA curve was! .... Pink Floyd on vinyl is quite amazing. Also find myself BSing with guys in a vintage record store now.