I am running a MusiKraft DL-103 and love the sound. Have run a bunch of others with equal success but the Denon outshines them all.
^^^$$$$$$$$$$
Why is a MC more demanding to set up? What MM have you had to compare?MC are more demanding with set-up & pairing a good phono stage. Get this right and theres no going back to mm IMO.
I have both the dl160 and the new at95vm ml, ml is better. Stylus is replaceable too.I have a td160 (fully modded) with lin basik plus arm and AT110e cart. I like the ballsy sound of it but it picks up more surface noise than id like. What cartridge could u recommend that would be a good upgrade.........i know nothing of AT latest carts the VM series do u have any experience with my curent cart and the new AT ones??..........i was thinking Shure V15 3 with Sas stylus or Denon dl103..........
Also have a lenco l78 thats next in line for hot rodding..........
synergy young man. Associated gear that goes along with MC need to be right. 91e, 95's, V15's, Grados, bla, bla. Theres been a few.Why is a MC more demanding to set up? What MM have you had to compare?
Chris
Not so young just still healthy. Associated gear need to be right with all carts, correct compliance etc. You cant just slap a Grado (you mentioned or indeed a V15 on a heavy or even a heavier medium arm. Yes MC needs more amplification so transformers, headamp or a preamp like my DNM with a MC input, but non of this is synergy it is just what is required. My best cart is a Decca super gold which is actually MI, it is supposed to be fussy and require you synergy but not in my opinion it seems to work quite well on most arms. My collection of MC carts too most are unfussy as long as compliance is right synergy kind of a daft thing to say, as we always need synergy with all carts to some degree.synergy young man. Associated gear that goes along with MC need to be right. 91e, 95's, V15's, Grados, bla, bla. Theres been a few.
I am running a MusiKraft DL-103 and love the sound. Have run a bunch of others with equal success but the Denon outshines them all.
I am running a MusiKraft DL-103 and love the sound. Have run a bunch of others with equal success but the Denon outshines them all.
If I had the money for a DL-103 it would be a Musikraft! Beautiful craftsmanship!
Wait a minute, I thought you said in another thread that the Decca cart you had outshines them all. So did the Decca get unseated by a LOMC? Only one can outshine them all.![]()
I have not used the straight up 103. I have used the D variant of the 103 and had no issues with balance.
The MusiKraft DL-103 outshines others on my PX3. Just like the OP asked about. Never had the Decca on the PX3. Not a match. I use the Decca on a Rabco SL-8e Sony TTS-3000A combination. Now with that arm it's a match and is the best cartridge I have ever heard. Have not heard them all however.![]()
I would have never guess that a heavy cart like the MusiKraft would have been a good match for the Yamaha PX tables. I have an old Wood body Grado on my PX2 and just about pulled the trigger for a new stylus for my Grace F9 which I know based on some past articles would be a good match for the PX2 tonearm. Do you think the MusiKraft DL-103 would be better cart overall than a Grace F9 with a Soundsmith Ruby stylus?