SpeakerLabFan
< speakerlab 7's
I pair I've been very happy with are JBL 4425 Studio Monitors.
+1
:thmbsp: for the 44xx series
I pair I've been very happy with are JBL 4425 Studio Monitors.
I have to disagree with your last opinion.
All my L-100s, 4310s, 4311s and 4312s still perform as well as they did when new. No "refoaming" required.
My original L-100s. 35 years old. Other than the grille issue,resolved in the 80's, no problems.
Look at the quality of construction of JBL drivers. Compare the construction of a vintage JBL driver to most of the competition from the same era.
Literally no comparison.
Opinions vary. Always will. But in my opinion, they were well worth what they charged for them.
I have a pair of NLAs that were given to me by a lady having a yard sale. She told me that her son said they needed to be "reglued". When a fellow AKer (a fine fellow indeed) refoamed them for me, it appeared that it had already been done once before!
Look at this comparison from the Lansing Heritage website :
http://www.lansingheritage.org/html/jbl/reference/general/1975-sum.htm
The sonic characteristics of a JBL speaker are clearly a matter of personal taste. There's dissention in the ranks even, as to which JBLs are preferred.
But there is little room to argue the quality of a vintage JBL speaker.![]()
+1
:thmbsp: for the 44xx series
![]()
Many buy the L100's or their cousins and as Zilch likes to say they are "fun but fake".
Their frequency response curve is not flat, there's a bump in the bass region that makes them a "rock n roll" speaker. They sound really "fun" with Van Halen. :thmbsp:What exactly does that mean?
What exactly does that mean?