Todd Dawson
Member
I had a pair of these bad boys back in the late 80’s… 12 inch woofer with a passive radiator and liquid cooler midrange and tweeters. Efficiency was 96db! Frequency response: 35 to 20,000 and power handling of 100W.
Never heard of the T-1200 speaker. Can you post some pics?
Never heard of the T-1200 speaker. Can you post some pics?
I just posted some pics… These were the T-1200 Tower Monitors circa. 1988. Apparently, they must have been rare as I had trouble finding stock footage as well. They sounded fantastic, though… wish I still had them!It's not just you, Google hasn't heard of them either.
Google did mention some Realistic MC-1200 speakers...
I thought they sounded superb, and I was very impressed by their efficiency. I had a Sony home theatre amp, a Yamaha equalizer, a Sony cassette deck and a Sony CD player. Later on I sold them and got a pair of Cerwin Vegas. I still say the Realistics gave a good bang for the buck, all things considered.So how did you like them? what were you pairing them with amplification wise
Always wanted a pair in the catalog they were in the top receiver package usually with the sta2080 sta2100 or sta2300 above the Mach 1 s in the food chain !I had a pair of these bad boys back in the late 80’s… 12 inch woofer with a passive radiator and liquid cooler midrange and tweeters. Efficiency was 96db! Frequency response: 35 to 20,000 and power handling of 100W.
I remember that.. did you have the opportunity to hear the sta -2100? What were your thoughts when comparing it to the 2080?Always wanted a pair in the catalog they were in the top receiver package usually with the sta2080 sta2100 or sta2300 above the Mach 1 s in the food chain !
The sta2100 is an amazing powerful receiver at a 120 wpc it could easily drive 2 sets of t2000 or Mach ones the sta2080 had it beat in my opinion in over all sound quality 80 wpc at .03 % is still plenty of power which is my one set up I use it to drive a pair of Mach 2 and a pair of klh speakers often in vintage receivers the sweet spot for sound is 50-80watt range below that very warm sounding but lacks the power above that can sometimes sound less refined but if I ever get a chance to get a minty sta2100 or sta2300 I wouldn’t hesitate I already have 2 sta2080sI remember that.. did you have the opportunity to hear the sta -2100? What were your thoughts when comparing it to the 2080?
That’s awesome… a lot of audiophiles have said the same. For instance, that a pioneer SX-1980 sounds harsh. I can’t say, but it looks like realistic modeled their Sta-2100 after it.The sta2100 is an amazing powerful receiver at a 120 wpc it could easily drive 2 sets of t2000 or Mach ones the sta2080 had it beat in my opinion in over all sound quality 80 wpc at .03 % is still plenty of power which is my one set up I use it to drive a pair of Mach 2 and a pair of klh speakers often in vintage receivers the sweet spot for sound is 50-80watt range below that very warm sounding but lacks the power above that can sometimes sound less refined but if I ever get a chance to get a minty sta2100 or sta2300 I wouldn’t hesitate I already have 2 sta2080s
I have a pair I got from my father afterI had a pair of these bad boys back in the late 80’s… 12 inch woofer with a passive radiator and liquid cooler midrange and tweeters. Efficiency was 96db! Frequency response: 35 to 20,000 and power handling of 100W.
I had a pair of these bad boys back in the late 80’s… 12 inch woofer with a passive radiator and liquid cooler midrange and tweeters. Efficiency was 96db! Frequency response: 35 to 20,000 and power handling of 100W.