• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

EL84 Plate Voltage

relaximus

Consoles 'Я' Us
My '63 Fisher Electra currently has 7189s for its output quads. The 480A chassis (according to the lettering on it) calls for EL84/6BQ5/7189 output tubes. During a very recent recap, the plate voltages measured ~430v without the tuner/preamp load which would bring it in around 400v (perhaps a little less) when back in the console. Does anyone have experience running EL84s at this high a plate voltage? I'd like to try a new matched quad of TAD-EL84-STRs or Sovtek EL84Ms in it, but am unsure how they will stand up. Anyone have opinions? My only reason for wanting to try this is the quad in there now consists of 3 Lorenz and 1 Radio Shack 7189s. The ECC83s (on the amp and preamp chassis) are all original Fisher branded Tele's.

Thanks!
Dave
 
Register to hide this ad
The el 84m and the russian 6p14p-ev should work fine, my sansui 500-a takes the 7189a's and jim mcshane said to use the russian tubes as they will handle the voltage.
 
Run 7189s RCA or GE NOS and you should be cool....well...fine; none of those tubes ever run cool. :D

Keep an eye on the anodes, and tweak the control grid bias if things start to get red. Check on the O-scope at all signal levels for notch distortion so's you don't get too carried away with the bias.
 
The el 84m and the russian 6p14p-ev should work fine, my sansui 500-a takes the 7189a's and jim mcshane said to use the russian tubes as they will handle the voltage.
Endspec:

Have you run them? If so, how do they sound? I'm really leaning towards the STRs as I have read nothing but rave reviews of them. The problem with the STRs is that most of the reviewers are running them in guitar amps. The Sovtek EL84Ms get better reviews than their standard issue EL84s as well, even in a standard 6BQ5 application. I really can't afford NOS Mullards or Tele's, but would really like to have a matched quad in this piece. It already sounds 1,000% better after the recap, I just want to ensure that its sound potential matches its looks. My main concern is having to replace a quad of output tubes every 6 months due to over-driving them with higher (than specified) plate voltages.

Dave
 
I have not run them yet as I have not orderd them from Jim (no $) but I have read that they sound real good. I need to order some soon as I want my sansui back up for my TT, miss my lp's lol.
 
... Keep an eye on the anodes, and tweak the control grid bias if things start to get red. Check on the O-scope at all signal levels for notch distortion so's you don't get too carried away with the bias.
Old1625:

OMG! You are speaking out of my league here. Understand please, I did not perform the recap. I am very new to tubes, but am totally in love with old consoles. I have so much to learn. Bring it down to the 3rd-grade level and I might get the gist of what you are saying. Just tell me what I need to look for (visually) if there is a problem. NOS tubes are not in the plan for this thing as they are just too damn spendy. Until I amass a drawer full of old tubes from consoles beyond repair, I am stuck with new-production valves for replacements. I would not even be considering replacing these if they were all the same.

Dave
 
My little Us-made Shell amp takes two 7189s too. I din't imaging those tubes to be worn down but a tube tester showed that that was the issue (http://www.audiokarma.org/forums/showthread.php?t=156859).

A new pair of Sovtek el84M put life back in the little SE amp, and what I hear is not that bad. Actually it is very good!. At least it is a very cheap way to get 7189-ish tubes.

PQR
 
i've used many quads of EH EL84's in the past. the question is not the quality of sound, but whether it will take the voltage and last long enough or not. the sound is great - not as good as NOS, but if you haven't actually heard the NOS tele's or amperex's, then you're not missing anything really. :D

in my experience, i had to adjust bias voltage every single time i used those new production tubes-that's if they do survive the first several hours of work. sometimes i had to drop it by a lot. you should be able to locate a bias resistor for each channel, and you simply experiment with different values. i can't remember specific numbers and all circuits and tubes are different when it comes to taking voltage - each will act somewhat differently. after you replace current tubes with new production tubes, you will likely see red plates. increase resistor values to control the bias while measuring it with multimeter.
 
Old1625:

OMG! You are speaking out of my league here. Understand please, I did not perform the recap. I am very new to tubes, but am totally in love with old consoles. I have so much to learn. Bring it down to the 3rd-grade level and I might get the gist of what you are saying. Just tell me what I need to look for (visually) if there is a problem. NOS tubes are not in the plan for this thing as they are just too damn spendy. Until I amass a drawer full of old tubes from consoles beyond repair, I am stuck with new-production valves for replacements. I would not even be considering replacing these if they were all the same.

Dave

OK, I hear you! But there is the right way to do it, and then other not necessarily wrong, but not quite right.

And I did have a famous musician here once say that he wanted only the "cream of the crop, new-old-stock" tubes in his Fender amp. I said to him that he needed to prepare to spend some serious brass. Typical of his breed he cut me short by saying "I'm not concerned with that--do whatcha gotta do--I gotta spit now; I have things going on all over the place here!"

He retracted when he found out how much some of these NOS pipsqueak output tubes actually cost....

The aftermarket tubes tend to vary a bit in characteristic, and it is important to recognise this at the start when considering revalving an amp.

That being said....

If you are not equipped with an oscilloscope and dummy loads, the quick-n-dirty for setting bias on outputs can be a Mickey Mouse adjustment merely by having the power amp hooked to a preamp set to phono mode in open conditions (i.e. no TT attached) to provide a level of background noise. (In the case of a guitar amp you merely turn up the master and gain pots to obtain a background amplifier noise.)

With that background noise in performance tweak the bias (by whatever means necessary) until you have found the point where the effective gain of the output stage has started to drop off (i.e. as the bias pot is increased more negative and the output volume of no-signal background noise starts to decrease) that is the critical point for bias adjustment in raw field experience on my part. Then I drop the negative bias a bit--to allow an increased idle current flow through the outputs, then I study the anodes to see if they tend to want to get more red as times goes along.

I'll have to admit it is a tweaky process, and takes a bit of experience to get it right.

I do it by gut feeling at this point if I don't have all equipment on hand. You can give this all a try, or perhaps yell for help from someone that has had a bit more time at this, and stick around and learn from the process. I've always believed the best all-round doctor for normal problems in a tube amp these days is its educated owner.

If you want it badly enoughh this education is not altogether hard to come by as applicable to most garden-variety tube amps...IMHO....
 
... If you want it badly enoughh this education is not altogether hard to come by as applicable to most garden-variety tube amps...IMHO....
Old1625:

Thank you! Even I can understand that! And yep, education is why I'm here!

Cheers!
Dave
 
I have a Pioneer made to use 7189a's and I'm using the Sovtek el84M's in it. The Sovteks are built to the higher voltage standard of the 7189. They handle the load in my amp just fine and that puppy pushes them right to very limit of the tube - maybe even a bit beyond the spec. If your amp is putting 400 V on the pates of the outputs once its tubed and running you will be fine with the Sovetks.
 
shelly d:

Thank you! That is exactly the "hands on" type of reply I was looking for!!!

How's the sound? How long for break-in?

Dave
 
Dave,

If you see my threads I just received a Quad of STR's, and a Quad of M's. I bought them because I want to see how they compare in my amp (Heathkit SA-2). Tomorrow I am planning on installing them, and doing some comparison listening using vinyl and cd's. I will try to post my personal opinion.

I were told by the previous owner of the amp that it had EL84-M's installed, but one tube blew, and when I checked it didn't say EL84-M anywhere, so I was suspicious. I believe it had EI EL-84, but the markings are garbled. Anyways this was a gift from my cousin who was the original owner and did extensive mod's to it.
 
Ordered a buncha 6p14p-eb

I just ordered a buncha 6p14p-eb from deep inside a bunker full of fanatical ruskies . . . . 20 of them.

Well, it might have been just an ordinary merchant now that I think about it.

Anyway, I can't really match them properly with my Hickock 6000 and 6000A testers, but I am going to give it a try and then run them in my scott 222c that would prefer 7198 tubes.

I'll post back what I find. I have old stock 6bq5 in there now and they are wearing out fast but sounding great anyway. +400 volt plate seems to confront them.

Anyone know if the EH EL84M are new production? Or simply relabeled 6p14p-EB tubes?

Dan
 
....Anyone know if the EH EL84M are new production? Or simply relabeled 6p14p-EB tubes?

Dan

Don't know the answer to that question. Most of the Soviet Military 6pi14pi-ev (6П14П -ЕВ) are dated mid-80s. They are excellent and that is what I prefer. While I have no data to back up my feeling, I prefer NOS vintage production. Have had maybe one out of about 30 or so that was a little low in transconductance. But the biggest problem that I have experienced was at my own hand. I did not put each on into an individual box. Consequently, I have broken three so far from improper storage. So, if the ones that you get come in the individual green box, you are good to go. If not, be careful if you jam them into a container. They are not especially fragile. I just hate to see a new tube with white getter flashing... not good:sigh:
 
I just ordered a buncha 6p14p-eb from deep inside a bunker full of fanatical ruskies . . . . 20 of them.

Well, it might have been just an ordinary merchant now that I think about it.

Anyway, I can't really match them properly with my Hickock 6000 and 6000A testers, but I am going to give it a try and then run them in my scott 222c that would prefer 7198 tubes.

I'll post back what I find. I have old stock 6bq5 in there now and they are wearing out fast but sounding great anyway. +400 volt plate seems to confront them.

Anyone know if the EH EL84M are new production? Or simply relabeled 6p14p-EB tubes?

Dan

EL84M ARE in current production, branded Sovtek. In fact, the last 2-3 years of production of those tubes are much better than the earlier era of tubes sold with the same number. I highly recommend the last few years Sovtek EL84M.

The 6P14P-EB is the EXACT SAME TUBE as the EL84M. The only difference would be when the tubes were produced. EL84M is a designation applied to the tubes by New Sensor via the "Sovtek" brand.

The EL84M = 7189, not 7189A. If you use them in 7189A applications you may have to do a bit of rewiring, and whether they will perform well is going to be dependent on the application. Me, I'd probably look at dropping the screen voltages a bit and keeping the dissipation at or under 7189 limits to use an "M" in a 7189A hole.

Also remember that EL84/7189/7189A tubes were often used in cathode bias circuits. To find the plate or screen voltages you have to deduct the cathode voltage - for example, you might measure:

- 400 volts from the plate to chassis ground
- 20 volts from the cathode to chassis ground

Since the tube only "sees" the difference between plate and cathode, the plate voltage is actually 380 volts.

Finally, higher voltage in and of itself does not cause a tube to wear faster! You could have 600 volts on the plate and screen of an EL84 and if the current is zero, the tube will not wear at all. The failure mode of excessively high voltages is arcing, either from pin to pin at the socket or from element to element within the tube envelope.

On the other hand, if an increase in voltage causes the tube to have to dissipate more wattage (meaning heat), then the increased voltage can contribute to a failure for sure. A tube run at 300 plate volts and 40 ma will have to dissipate .04 x 300, or 12 watts. Raise the voltage to 400 (with no other changes) and the dissipation increases to .04 x 400 or 16 watts. That dissipation increase may be enough to kill a tube by itself - but the increase from 300 to 400 volts probably will also cause the tube to pass more current (unless you change something else like the bias voltage to prevent that from occurring). If the change to 400 volts from 300 in our example also causes the tube to pass 50 ma. (up from 40), then the dissipation becomes .05 x 400, or 20 watts! That's a 60+% increase - that can kill a tube for sure!

When thinking of why/how tubes failures occur, remember:

1. Excess current - even with dissipation in the specs - can deplete the cathode and cause the tube to wear out more quickly. There is a finite number of electrons the cathode can emit, and excess current depletes them more quickly.

2. Excess voltage does NOT wear out a tube more quickly (if the dissipation and current are unchanged). Excess voltage can cause arcing. But excess voltage alone cannot "wear out" a tube.

3. Excess dissipation - caused by any combination of voltage and current - can cause a tube to wear out more quickly. Keep in mind that voltage and current could both be in spec, but the tube could still be required to dissipate more wattage (heat) than it is capable of regardless! Localized overheating inside the tube can occur.

I hope this helped...
 
Wow great info

Thanks for all the Info Jim!

Someone said I should ask you about this stuff. I kinda only bought a lot of the ruskie tubes because I did not want to have an amp I could not get tubes for in the future. (affordably)

So, since this scott 222c was designed for 7189 tubes, and has a fixed bias that was not changed. (I think I am correct about the fixed bias, I know it is stock) Then 6bq5 were installed, we would expect the tubes to be pulling too much current? I should calculate that out!

I think what I am getting out of this is that once I put the new tubes in, I should check and calculate the current and then the power output, check the specs on that ruskie tube and then I can tweek that bias as needed to find that balance between sound and tube life.

Ohhh, I am recalling TubeLab's thing he said he got from the old ham guys, that high plate voltage is not the deal, run low current and they live a long time. (course it is an equation that needs to be balanced.)

Well, the tubes are NOT red plating at all, I will also turn off the lights tonight and double check that.

Thanks a mill for the info!

Dan
 
So, since this scott 222c was designed for 7189 tubes, and has a fixed bias that was not changed. (I think I am correct about the fixed bias, I know it is stock) Then 6bq5 were installed, we would expect the tubes to be pulling too much current? I should calculate that out!

A lot depends on the tubes themselves. Keep in mind that normal production variance will cause tubes to have quite a wide range of current draw even if all else is equal.

I like to install a 10 Ohm resistor in the cathode of each power tube so I can measure the current through each tube independently. Do it using Ohm's Law - measure the voltage drop across the resistor and convert it to current through the tube by the formula:

Current = Voltage/Resistance

That way you can be SURE of what you are dealing with!
 
Jim:

As you can see from my 1st attachment, my amp calls for EL84/6BQ5/7189 output tubes. However, there are currently 3 Lorenz 7189As and 1 Radio Shack Gold 7189A. The second attachment is the underside of the chassis. Is there anything indicative, in that second attachment, that the chassis was rewired for the 7189As? The 3rd attachment shows the tubes prior to a mild refurb. The RatShack tube clearly shows it as being a 7189A. The 3 Lorenz tubes were also marked as such, but too faintly to be visible in the picture.

Thank you for your insights.
Dave
 

Attachments

  • 1.jpg
    1.jpg
    81 KB · Views: 36
  • 2.jpg
    2.jpg
    99.1 KB · Views: 39
  • 3.jpg
    3.jpg
    100.5 KB · Views: 40
Jim:

As you can see from my 1st attachment, my amp calls for EL84/6BQ5/7189 output tubes. However, there are currently 3 Lorenz 7189As and 1 Radio Shack Gold 7189A. The second attachment is the underside of the chassis. Is there anything indicative, in that second attachment, that the chassis was rewired for the 7189As? The 3rd attachment shows the tubes prior to a mild refurb. The RatShack tube clearly shows it as being a 7189A. The 3 Lorenz tubes were also marked as such, but too faintly to be visible in the picture.

Thank you for your insights.
Dave

Dave,

I can't see any mods to the amp in the picture. However, not every amp needs rewiring to use 7189A, it depends on what's connected to the "spare" pins more than anything else.

Are you sure the other tubes besides the Rat Shack are 7189A? The tube labeled Fisher does not appear to be - it also has a ribbed plate, not a smooth plate like the Lorenz labeled tubes, as well as a different bottle shape.

In any case, I'd set up the amp to use 7189 (EL-84M) and be done with it.
 
Back
Top Bottom