Poultrygeist
Lunatic Member
If I had to take the "Pro" out of my gear I'd also have to give up the Eminence Alpha's and Beta's. Nothing wrong with diversity.
I have a couple of these for bi and tri amp setups. There nice because they have rca and 1/4 inputs and outs.
http://www.allaudioexpo.com/nav/details.asp?itemid=1117&catid=117&tran=fgle&itemb=PYX3X
I have a couple of these for bi and tri amp setups. There nice because they have rca and 1/4 inputs and outs.
http://www.pyleaudio.com/sku/PYX3X/3-Way-Active-Stereo-Crossover-Network
http://www.allaudioexpo.com/nav/details.asp?itemid=1117&catid=117&tran=fgle&itemb=PYX3X
I like the price and I want a 12 db per octive slope. I wonder how it sounds? I have been looking at this Rolls SX45 Stereo Two-Way Mini Crossover w/Sub Output, but need advise incase it is junk.
http://www.parts-express.com/pe/showdetl.cfm?partnumber=245-1184
Reading latlely that mini DSP have certain advantages over analog active crossovers.
How does miniDSP works internally? It is digital, so what happens to the analog signal, is there any conversion ADC/DAC?
That Pyle looks interesting at that price. How does it sound, or have you compared it to anything else?
Why is a 12 db slope more desirable than a 24?
Well, this means it all comes down how good is the DAC in the miniDSP, making the source DAC useless, right?
In that case if I have a good DAC and want to keep it I better use an analog active crossover.
Wow, it gets complicatedThat is correct. But any possible loss from DAC quality, is well outweighted by doing all processing in digital domain, where much higher precision is possible. You may decide to use digital crossover with DIGITAL output, and get your own DAC for each subchannel.