Porkloin
Oscar Heil Groupie
So it sounds like mass is the only tangible difference. If an alnico magnet is twice as powerful per weight/size, make the ceramic magnet twice the weight/size to get the desired results? I suppose the only one who would have a beef with that is the poor UPS guy carrying them up the drive.My AMT1's are first gens, 10" drivers, ported cabs, made in '75 before ESS moved away from alnico.
The differences are really quite nuanced and only reveal themselves as you drive the speakers close to their electrical limits. The modes of distortion produces by an alnico magnet are somewhat similar to those produced by a tube amp whereas the distortion from a ceramic is more like solid state clipping. But you really only get into that heated debate with guitar amp fanatics who are very particular about their tone and overdrive characteristics. In a home audio speaker you really don't want to drive the speaker hard enough to exploit those distortion characteristics so it doesn't make any difference. Between '76 and '78 everyone was moving to ceramics and to avoid having to redesign whole speaker systems they were basically engineering their ceramic magnet drivers to behave identically to alnico. Aside from the magnets, my alnico drivers look absolutely identical to the ceramic drivers.
Bottom line: for speakers of the mid-late 70's the magnet basically doesn't matter.
The magnets on my monsters have combined to form a singularity that I blame for the disappearance of everything, including that last piece of chocolate cake in the kitchen. I'd like to theorize that their great size and strength is responsible for the tightness of my bass, but that would be a disservice to the engineers that had to think out the entire package.




