• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

Ferrograph 424 reel to reel

LPD

AK Subscriber
Subscriber
I picked up a Ferrograph 424A reel to reel today. Anyone familiar with these units. Its tube and uses about 8 Mullard 12AX7's :) Can't complain there. Is there a market for these units? Or is it useful for parts?
 
Register to hide this ad
"This thread's dead, Jim"

Is it best to let sleeping threads lie? Or can they be revived?

Let's try. To answer the OP's question, the Ferrograph 424 was planted firmly in the midst of Ferrograph's reign of Great Britain for studio use and "hifi enthusiast" homes. Value, not great today, but they are still quite popular with collecters. Of course, it was a tube machine.

Here's a link that puts it into their lineup back then:

http://www.gwest56.freeserve.co.uk/ferrograph/series2-6.htm

All this is just a thinly disguised opportunity to show my Ferrograph Series Seven, the first transistorized Ferrograph. I found some better pictures, albeit taken with one of my wife's more jaunty quilts in the background.

Innovative features for a tape recorder back in 1968, such as:

. Variable Bias
. Variable wind / rewind (killer fast)
. Sound on Sound recording (well, it had three heads, of course)
. Echo facilities (see above)
. Ability to match input / output levels for correct monitoring of the recording

All this and the only R2R I know of with 8 3/4" reels.

It's shown in the pictures with a 7" reel on it, later I bought a few 8 3/4" ones, much nicer looking, and they still fit on even with the dust cover in place.

I should have taken a shot with the bottom door open, showing all the less-frequently used controls, such as bias, input/output level matching, tape monitor switches for each channel independantly, and even bass and treble, which affected the low-level outputs for quick and dirty on the spot EQ jobs.

All this and 10 WRMS per channel with built-in speakers? Fun, wow!
 
Last edited:
Thanks guys. Hmmm(n)... I wrote a long, thoughtful and incredibly interesting reply to this last night, but it seems to have gone in the bit bucket. Oh, well...
 
Back
Top Bottom