• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

Fisher KX-100 vs. Scott LK-48 + speaker recs

robind

New Member
Hi, i'm pretty new to hifi/audio in general. I sold 2 SL-1200s last year and have been thinking about what I want my new setup to be. I'm partial to vintage gear and I always loved the sound of my dad's tube amps growing up, so I'm leaning heavily towards starting with an integrated tube amp and then building out my setup from there. I plan on using my system almost exclusively for listening to vinyl, and specifically jazz. Should also mention that I'm hoping to spend under $1000 for the whole system, including TT, amp, and speakers (and any repairs necessary).

Someone locally is offering me a Fisher KX-100 for $200, but my guess is that there are probably some amount of issues with it because the seller doesn't know anything about it besides that he got it from his collector friend, and it's in "good" condition. He seems to have also powered it up without connecting to speakers or testing tubes, which makes me nervous. However, it does appear to be in good cosmetic condition (attached some pics, which are the only ones he had).

I also found a Scott LK-48 on ebay for $420 with shipping (https://www.ebay.com/itm/1-SCOTT-LK...-in-great-condition-recently-svc/193141740954), which seems more likely to be a plug and play unit because it's been serviced.

My questions are:
  1. Should I go for the Fisher, Scott, or something totally different?
  2. Although i'd like to be able to test/repair gear myself, i have absolutely no experience and would be very hesitant to do so. Should I expect to spend a hefty amount on servicing/repairing/modding the Fisher to be usable and sound good as a daily amp (i'm located in the LA area, not sure if that changes expected costs)?
  3. Do you have any speaker recommendations for either of these amps or similar tube gear? I'm currently in a very small apartment space and so only have about 12" room on either side of my credenza for speakers. I found a nice condition pair of JBL Studio 570s for $200 on my local CL, but i wouldn't know where to start to assess whether these would match the kind of amp I want. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
Apologies if i'm coming off super ignorant—i should reiterate that I'm a complete newbie, so please school me!!

-Robin
 

Attachments

  • be25bf126b7340cfb251d33af6305802.jpg
    be25bf126b7340cfb251d33af6305802.jpg
    44.5 KB · Views: 35
  • fa468b91a3f84e889b0e98b5f3461558.jpg
    fa468b91a3f84e889b0e98b5f3461558.jpg
    50 KB · Views: 34
Register to hide this ad
Fisher would work with more speakers because it has more watts per channel... Prob atleast double the scott power. I think its Fisher 7868 vs Scott EL84
 
The Fisher KX-100 is the kit version of the X-100-B. I have a KX-100. It’s a very nice amp and fairly easy to work on. You will find lots of information here on AK about that amp.

I can’t speak for the Scott but I can recommend the Fisher. A pair of KLH Six speakers would sound nice with that amp. Yes, I have those too.
 
Thank y'all for all the replies! I think i'll go ahead and pick up the KX-100 this weekend, and I'll post more pics of the unit. Given that i have no knowledge of the inner workings of tube amps, should i just take it straight to a tech to get it checked out—or test it in some way myself?
 
BTW, the fact that The Fisher has a wood case makes it a no-brainer. You could pay that much just for the wood case.
 
Back
Top Bottom