OK... with all the different threads that have "mutated" into sweep tube amp discussions, I thought a thread ACTUALLY ABOUT THEM in the first place would be a good idea.
I'm thinking of coming up with a design for one, for one thing... a design with elements of some of the Berning designs (biasing/direct coupling of output tube grids, etc), and incorporating some aspects of some of the "classic" designs (Mullard circuit, etc), but with greater power output (60-80 watts/ch).
One idea I had, was something like the following:
Input: Pentode, like EF86, EF804, 6EJ7/EF184, or like in grounded-cathode mode
Phase splitter: 6SN7 or 6CG7/6FQ7 or 12AT7 in LTP
Gain stage/driver: 2- 12B4A, grounded cathode (models at ~ 900 ohm output impedance) DIRECT COUPLED (with a separate B+ and B- supply for the 12B4As)- no coupling caps to the grids of the output tubes (to allow AB2 mode, if necessary for full output). This would use a bias scheme (DC biasing of the 12B4s would provide output DC voltage adjustment for the grids of the output tubes) like the Berning EA-230, in essence. This looks like it could actually get the necessary voltage swing (like +- 150 volts AC or so) to drive the screens of the outputs.
Output tube: 6AV5 or 12AV5 in sweep-drive PP.
No semiconductors; this is strictly an "old-school" design.
Another, more ambitious design idea- a three-stage (is it possible?)!
Input: 6AV6/12AV6 in "max gain" tuning in grounded-cathode (or maybe a SRPP or something similar using a 12AX7 or 6EU7 or the like?)
Phase splitter/driver: 6H30P in LTP (would have less than 2K output impedance), DIRECT COUPLED to the output tube grids (no couplling caps- would require separate B+ and B- for the LTP).
Outputs: 6AV5 or 12AV5 in sweep-drive PP.
Any thoughts on either of these ideas? My thoughts are that the first design (four-stage) is much more plausible... it seems to be do-able, according to TubeCad and the like, comparing specs to circuit alignments in the Berning amps and Eico HF22/HF35 front-end designs. Looks like GOOD bandwidth would be possible (as in like over 250KHz open-loop bandwidth, maybe higher).
The second design is temptingly attractive to me, IF it could be done. I like the idea of only three stages- basically, a near-classic Mullard design, only with probably a triode input stage (to get lower output impedance driving the LTP). But, as might be expected, there's pitfalls everywhere- bandwidth limitations on the first two stages (haven't modeled the 6H30P yet, so I don't know how it would work for the LTP- might be better?), gain limitations vs. balance in the phase splitter vs. output impedance driving the grids of the outputs, etc. It's definitely a challenge!
For either of these, I'm thinking of some of the economical Edcor output transformers... they've got a nice 60 watt PP transformer, that's only about $70, and a 100 watt for about $90... could be a good start...
So, any thoughts?? I'm trying to draw out schematics as I work them out in my head... I'll try posting up some hypothetical circuit diagrams, if I can get 'em where they seem where they might actually be reasonably practical, in theory...
Regards,
Gordon.
I'm thinking of coming up with a design for one, for one thing... a design with elements of some of the Berning designs (biasing/direct coupling of output tube grids, etc), and incorporating some aspects of some of the "classic" designs (Mullard circuit, etc), but with greater power output (60-80 watts/ch).
One idea I had, was something like the following:
Input: Pentode, like EF86, EF804, 6EJ7/EF184, or like in grounded-cathode mode
Phase splitter: 6SN7 or 6CG7/6FQ7 or 12AT7 in LTP
Gain stage/driver: 2- 12B4A, grounded cathode (models at ~ 900 ohm output impedance) DIRECT COUPLED (with a separate B+ and B- supply for the 12B4As)- no coupling caps to the grids of the output tubes (to allow AB2 mode, if necessary for full output). This would use a bias scheme (DC biasing of the 12B4s would provide output DC voltage adjustment for the grids of the output tubes) like the Berning EA-230, in essence. This looks like it could actually get the necessary voltage swing (like +- 150 volts AC or so) to drive the screens of the outputs.
Output tube: 6AV5 or 12AV5 in sweep-drive PP.
No semiconductors; this is strictly an "old-school" design.
Another, more ambitious design idea- a three-stage (is it possible?)!
Input: 6AV6/12AV6 in "max gain" tuning in grounded-cathode (or maybe a SRPP or something similar using a 12AX7 or 6EU7 or the like?)
Phase splitter/driver: 6H30P in LTP (would have less than 2K output impedance), DIRECT COUPLED to the output tube grids (no couplling caps- would require separate B+ and B- for the LTP).
Outputs: 6AV5 or 12AV5 in sweep-drive PP.
Any thoughts on either of these ideas? My thoughts are that the first design (four-stage) is much more plausible... it seems to be do-able, according to TubeCad and the like, comparing specs to circuit alignments in the Berning amps and Eico HF22/HF35 front-end designs. Looks like GOOD bandwidth would be possible (as in like over 250KHz open-loop bandwidth, maybe higher).
The second design is temptingly attractive to me, IF it could be done. I like the idea of only three stages- basically, a near-classic Mullard design, only with probably a triode input stage (to get lower output impedance driving the LTP). But, as might be expected, there's pitfalls everywhere- bandwidth limitations on the first two stages (haven't modeled the 6H30P yet, so I don't know how it would work for the LTP- might be better?), gain limitations vs. balance in the phase splitter vs. output impedance driving the grids of the outputs, etc. It's definitely a challenge!
For either of these, I'm thinking of some of the economical Edcor output transformers... they've got a nice 60 watt PP transformer, that's only about $70, and a 100 watt for about $90... could be a good start...
So, any thoughts?? I'm trying to draw out schematics as I work them out in my head... I'll try posting up some hypothetical circuit diagrams, if I can get 'em where they seem where they might actually be reasonably practical, in theory...
Regards,
Gordon.