• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

Harman Kardon 900+, few questions

Dean Rantala

HiFI Droogie
Purchased this old gem some 15 years ago.

Over the years, it has needed a couple transistors and a half-hearted re-cap of the 4 amp boards.

A couple years back, one of the channels of the phono inputs went out, the noise in the amp section has become horrid and finally.... one channel has completely went out.

I got lucky and found a spare 900+ for parts on eBay really cheap (missing one amp board, cover, few knobs and couple jacks). I did this because... I am going to bite the bullet and do a full restoration on the original one I have had for years now.

For those not familiar... this was not only one of HK's most powerful receiver of the 70's, but had BUILT-IN SQ and CD-4 decoding.

Now, I never purchased it for quad use - and own no quad discs. Honestly, have no desire to get into that as a 2-channel guy. But this brings me to my first questions...

The entire phono pre-amp is integrated with the CD-4 board. It is my understanding that - due to CD-4 limitations - the phono signal is always cut above 15k or so, even in stereo mode. Is this true?

If so, it makes me wonder if it is even worth messing with preserving the CD-4 board or just roll a nice custom phono pre-amp board (non cd-4) from the designs at Elliot Sound Products? I see little use in preserving a feature that has (from what I understand) little-to-no software support.

The only album that would remotely interest me in quad would have been Pink Floyd DSOTM, and even that never seems to have made it to a CD-4 format.

The SQ matrix however... it seems this is just a matrix decoder and can do some neat tricks even with normal stereo tracks?

I will have extra LD3130's for the phono pre-amp IF I decide to repair the CD-4 circuit (from the spare unit).


My next round of questions involves the FM section. Honestly, this receiver has always sucked big time in the FM reception department. I recently purchased a nice Rigol DS1202Z-E Oscilloscope as well as a Rigol DG1022 function generator. I have never done an FM alignment before, but figured I cannot make it any worse than it is. Along with these 2 new pieces of lab equipment -I got several multimeters, 2 regulated linear power supplies (one is +/- dual rail), frequency counters, etc... Should I have all the equipment needed to perform this procedure?

I plan to recap the entire FM section as well as replace all the 2SC458's. So an alignment is most likely going to be necessary.
 
Register to hide this ad
My next round of questions involves the FM section. Honestly, this receiver has always sucked big time in the FM reception department. I recently purchased a nice Rigol DS1202Z-E Oscilloscope as well as a Rigol DG1022 function generator. I have never done an FM alignment before, but figured I cannot make it any worse than it is. Along with these 2 new pieces of lab equipment -I got several multimeters, 2 regulated linear power supplies (one is +/- dual rail), frequency counters, etc... Should I have all the equipment needed to perform this procedure?

I plan to recap the entire FM section as well as replace all the 2SC458's. So an alignment is most likely going to be necessary.

If you just replace the transistors in the FM section with similarly-performing replacements, you may not need an alignment. Recapping certianly will not, by itself, require an alignment.

Here are the links I've saved when trying to understand "how to do a FM alignment". Some will be more useful to you than others:

 
...But this brings me to my first questions...

The entire phono pre-amp is integrated with the CD-4 board. It is my understanding that - due to CD-4 limitations - the phono signal is always cut above 15k or so, even in stereo mode. Is this true?
Yes, it is true.


... it makes me wonder if it is even worth messing with preserving the CD-4 board or just roll a nice custom phono pre-amp board (non cd-4) from the designs at Elliot Sound Products? ...
It is probably not worth messing with the CD-4 capable decoder board if you will not listen to any CD-4 encoded records. I had a 900+ and I converted one of the two phono inputs into a standard two-channel phono section. It worked out quite well. I still kept the CD-4 board but just used the two-channel stereo phono input.

The SQ matrix however... it seems this is just a matrix decoder and can do some neat tricks even with normal stereo tracks?...
Yes, the SQ matrix decoder can be used to synthesize four-channel sound from any two-channel stereo source.

In terms of the tuner, both of the tuners in my two units seemed to work pretty well. I do not have any experience with the FM section so, I cannot help you there. Good luck.
 
Back
Top Bottom