So you would say that even older gear has the transparency to showcase the better DAC in the blue sound when compared to just using my MacBooks built in DAC?
What do you mean by transparency? Amplifier technology has not changed very much from then to now. What goes in comes out, ideally with very little change. Your Pioneer can amplify whatever you feed it.The better the source, the better the sound.
Your question is really about the quality of the DAC in the Node vs the quality of the DAC in your Mac.
As for the Pioneer...if you are happy with it listening to LPs and CDs, you will be equally happy with it listening to high-res files. Any sound quality improvement from higher-resolution files will be a function of the greater bit depth and/or frequency extension (higher sampling rate) and/or remastering of those files. BTW, note that the streaming services have somewhat bastardized the term "high resolution" From what I can tell, all of them include a mix of both CD quality and higher bitrate recordings in the "high-resolution" libraries.
There are better old/vintage amps than your Pioneer, and there are worse. Same for newer/new amps. THD, S/N ratio, delta between power into 8 vs 4 ohms (more is better) and linearity of response can give you some idea of "better"...but the best measurements do no always result in an amp that will sound best to your ears. And at some point, audible benefit from improvements in these specs becomes de minimis.
As for restoration...it is very hard to know the extent of the unavoidable changes in performance that have occurred in your unit as components, especially capacitors, degrade with age. Could be so small as to be a non-issue, or could be fairly dramatic. I have experienced both outcomes after restoration/rebuild.