We sold B&K for 5 years or more. I liked the sound, but they all ran to hot for me, which mean premature failure down the road. All their integrated HT units failed which I contributed to heat. The 200.7 and .5 if kept cool with external fans were OK. The integrated stereo units had less difficulties, but weren't trouble free. The 120.2, .3, amps worked great. Stereo pre-amps were Trouble free and the HT processors seem to be OK. The sound was nice, but could be dry on the bottom but nice on top. Better than Crown and Bryston and Krell for sure. Its a shame they didn't hold up well. Thats why we dropped the line. You'd probably be happier with big Denon or Marantz, but they can both be a little edgy. some times. Depending on which speakers you prefer Mac is always a good choice. You just need to know which amps to choose. With autoformers old style, or new style, amps without autoformers, or old style tube amps or the latest tube amps. All sound a little different from each other. My speakers prefer Mac amps without autoformers and solid state. Other speakers I have used or installed preferred the older Mc amps with autoformers or in some cases tube amps. Speakers like Magico S5 mk II seems to like the new 275, where a 2301 or a 2152 just aren't quite the right. I tried 601's and 611's and the sound just wasn't to my liking. As my better half remarked reed instruments sounded all wrong. She was a professional reed player so I bowed to her expertise. She preferred the little 275. So don't go running off looking for the perfect amp with out an audition, you maybe unpleasantly surprised! I usually am.