• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

How can I bi-wire these speakers?

crazy-in-az

Uhhhh....
I want to make sure I do this right so I don't damage these speakers. I still haven't found any info on them (more about that here: http://www.audiokarma.org/forums/index.php?threads/what-are-these-please-dont-say-white-van.700784/).

I'd like to use these with my JVC JR-S400 mkII. They sound great as they are, but I wanted to bi-wire them to see if they would improve. According to what I've read, it's as simple as removing the jumpers on the speakers. Then run speaker wire from output A on the receiver to the tweeter input on the speakers, and output B to the woofer input.

Does this sound correct? The speakers are rated at 8 ohms, and the receiver is rated at 4-16 ohms.

Here's a pic of the backplate and crossover-
100_3864_zpso7nt6y6m.jpg
100_3851_zpsmrlssiqs.jpg
 
Register to hide this ad
You are correct -- you only have to remove the jumpers and run a second set of wires to the other binding posts.
 
In effect you would only be making the jumpers longer.

This is exactly correct. Bi wiring will accomplish nothing.

And I say this knowing that this debate has been going on for as long as I can remember. Try it and you will see. If you hear any difference it will be because you believe you are supposed to hear a difference. It's known as psycho acoustics.

I'm quite sure now there will be all of those that have experienced this phenomenon jumping in here and telling me just how wrong I am. So......enjoy. And remember.....keep drinking that Kool Aid.
 
If I were going to do it I'd connect both cables to one output of the amplifier. Connecting half the speaker to B serves no purpose in this case and only introduces more stuff into the circuit.
 
This is exactly correct. Bi wiring will accomplish nothing.
You seem to want to express a strong opinion. Instead of ignorance and subjectivity, you might try to support it with some citation and fact.

For the benefit of others, and to better illustrate your ignorance it should be well understood that bi-wiring immediately adds a bit of series resistance to the signal path, and it is immediately measurable.
 
Bi-wiring is a contentious subject, much like all other wiring questions, but I think Vandersteen explains the (theoretical?) benefits on their website pretty well.
For what it's worth, I've heard some differences with some speakers. Never dramatic, and not always an improvement, but I believe it's worth trying.
Here's the passage from their Q&A page;

What is bi-wiring and what are the advantages?

Bi-wiring uses two separate sets of speaker cables to connect a single pair of loudspeakers to an amplifier. Coupled with a crossover designed specifically for bi-wiring, it offers many of the advantages of bi-amplifying the speakers with two separate amplifiers without the cost and complexity of two amplifiers.

We began experimenting with bi-wiring back in the early '80s, an era when horizontal bi-amplification was considered the ultimate way to drive quality loudspeakers. (Horizontal bi-amplification used one amplifier to drive the low-frequency section of a speaker and a second amplifier to drive the high-frequency section.) We noted that speakers sounded better when bi-amplified by two amplifiers than when driven by a single amplifier. Surprisingly, this superior performance was evident even when the speakers were bi-amplified by two identical amplifiers at a low volume level and the amplifiers were each driven full-range without an electronic crossover. We initially believed that the double power supplies and other components of two amplifiers were responsible for the improvement, however building amplifiers with twice the power supply and doubling-up on other critical components failed to provide the bi-amplification benefit.

So we looked at the speaker wires. With two amplifiers, bi-amplification used two sets of speaker cables so we experimented with doubling-up the speaker wires and with larger wire. Neither duplicated the bi-amplification improvements. Then we considered that in a bi-amplified system, one set of wires carries the low-frequencies and the other set of wires carries the high-frequencies. We modified a speaker's crossovers to accept two sets of cables and present different load characteristics to each set so that the low-frequencies would be carried by one set of wires and the high-frequencies by the other set of wires. Finally we heard the sonic improvements of bi-amplification with a single amplifier.

Additional experiments with a Hall Effect probe revealed that high-current bass frequencies created a measurable field around the wires that expanded and collapsed with the signal. We believe that this dynamic field modulates the smaller signals, especially the very low level treble frequencies. With the high-current signal (Bass) separated from the low-current signal (Treble) this small signal modulation was eliminated as long as the cables were separated by at least an inch or two. (To keep the treble cable out of the field surrounding the bass cable.)

The crossovers in Vandersteen bi-wirable speakers are engineered with completely separate high-pass and low-pass sections. The bass inputs pass low-frequencies to the woofers, but become more and more resistive at higher frequencies. The treble inputs pass high-frequencies to the midrange and tweeter, but become more and more resistive at low-frequencies. The output from the amplifier always takes the path of least resistance so deep bass frequencies go to the bass input (Low impedance at low-frequencies) rather than to the treble inputs (High impedance at low frequencies). For the same reason, treble frequencies go to the treble input (Low impedance at high-frequencies) rather than to the bass inputs (High impedance at high-frequencies). At the actual crossover frequency, the output from the amplifier would be divided equally between the two inputs as they would both have the same impedance at that frequency. Because of the different reflected impedances of the cables, the crossover between the woofer and midrange actually occurs at the wire ends where they connect to the amplifier.

The benefits of bi-wiring are most obvious in the midrange and treble. The low-current signal to the midrange and tweeter drivers does not have to travel on the same wire as the high-current woofer signal. The field fluctuations and signal regeneration of the high-current low-frequencies are prevented from distorting or masking the low-current high-frequencies. The back EMF (Electro-Mechanical Force) from the large woofer cannot affect the small-signal upper frequencies since they do not share the same wires.

The effects of bi-wiring are not subtle. The improvements are large enough that a bi-wire set of moderately priced cable will usually sound better than a single run of more expensive cable.

All the cables in a bi-wire set must be the same. There is often great temptation to use a wire known for good bass response on the woofer inputs and a different wire known for good treble response on the midrange/tweeter inputs. This will cause the different sonic characteristics of the two wires in the middle frequencies to interfere with the proper blending of the woofer and midrange driver through the crossover point. The consistency of the sound will be severely affected as the different sounding woofer and midrange drivers conflict with each other in the frequency range where our ears are most sensitive to sonic anomalies. The disappointing result is a vague image, a lack of transparency through the midrange and lower treble and a loss of detail and clarity.

Some of the benefits of bi-wiring are from the physical separation of the high-current bass and low-current midrange/tweeter wires. So-called bi-wire cables that combine the wires in one sheath do not offer the full advantages of true bi-wiring although they may be an excellent choice for mono-wiring the speakers.

The cables should all be the same length. This is not due to the time that the signal takes to travel through a cable, but rather that two different lengths of the same cable will sound different. If the cables connecting one speaker are a different length than the cables connecting the other speaker, the resulting difference in sound between the two speakers will compromise the imaging and coherence of the system. If different lengths of cable are used for the bass and midrange/tweeter inputs of the speakers, the effects will be similar to those experienced when using two different cables as described above.

Since short runs of speaker cable sound better than long runs, consider placing your electronics between the speakers rather than off to one side. If for convenience or aesthetic considerations, the electronics must be located a considerable distance from the speakers, it is usually preferable to place the amplifier between the speakers and use long interconnect cables and short speaker wire.
 
You seem to want to express a strong opinion. Instead of ignorance and subjectivity, you might try to support it with some citation and fact.

For the benefit of others, and to better illustrate your ignorance it should be well understood that bi-wiring immediately adds a bit of series resistance to the signal path, and it is immediately measurable.

Friend, I am a degreed electro mechanical engineer. I worked in this discipline for 40 years including working with EPI for many years and have been working with audio and video equipment for 50 years to the point of troubleshooting and repair of circuitry to component level. So....ignorance is not one of my fortes. If I write something here it is because I have done it, tested, measured it. I do not write things of which I have no knowledge.

But thank you for illustrating my point so well when I said: 'I'm quite sure now there will be all of those that have experienced this phenomenon jumping in here and telling me just how wrong I am.'

And regarding your statement above....."bi-wiring immediately adds a bit of series resistance to the signal path, and it is immediately measurable". Uh.....gee, really?
 
Last edited:
Friend, I am a degreed electro mechanical engineer. I worked in this discipline for 40 years including working with EPI for many years and have been working with audio and video equipment for 50 years to the point of troubleshooting and repair of circuitry to component level. So....ignorance is not one of my fortes. If I write something here it is because I have done it, tested, measured it. I do not write things of which I have no knowledge.


That explains it. YOU can't hear the difference or measure the difference so you believe there is no difference. There are those that hear a difference and for that reason I can not poo-poo all the 'upgrades' available to the consumer of audio goods. I don't use em all, there is a cost associated with most but I never use my lack of hearing or lack of yet to be discovered measurement knowledge and equipment to form an opinion of what OTHERS can hear.
 
Oh.....yet another illustration of my point. Thank you.

And just for clarification of your statement: 'There are those that hear a difference'.........I'm quite certain that there are those that believe that they hear a difference. And, in the end, that's all that matters. If you believe there is a sonic improvement then there is. To you.


Carry on.
 
Back
Top Bottom