• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

I'm Horny, Baby - Optimus Mach Three

Krosya

Well-Known Member
It's been a while since I was pretty active on this forum. Many reasons, really, but main one was - not much new was added to my audio collection. Yes, maybe some music, but not much in as far as new equipment goes. And there was a good reason for it - I was pretty happy with what I have and didnt even look at anything new. Every now and then I would check local sales, but nothing really jumped at me. Well, a couple of weeks ago I saw a pair of these Optimus Mach Threes for sale. Like many here, I happened to have a soft spot for old Radio Shack electronics. I have several receivers and speakers by them and like them all. Yet nothing with as large woofer as Machs have. I had several opportunities to get Mach one and/or two, but was not terribly impressed by them in person. Not bad speakers, but just didnt do it for me. Mach three on the other had never came up - and I gather its rather rare of the series. So, when these came up - I was interested. As usual, they needed new foams, but otherwise were in good shape, so I took a chance. Large woofer, and 2 horns - as a Klipsch fan, I just couldnt say no to these. Even though, when tested they didnt impressed me at seller's house. But foams were bad and his receiver was rather questionable.
Anyway, got foams done, put them into my main system - and WOW! Very impressive. Nothing what I expected based on many comments that Machs usually get. Very clean, clear and detailed. Great soundstage. Very good low end - nothing boomy. They have a good punch when recording calls for it. Horns are NOT shrill. Mids are smooth. I had them playing A-B with my Source Technology speakers that cost several thousand dollars and Machs hold their own. I did not expect that at all! There are probably no perfect speakers, and I am sure I will come across some faults with some recordings, but so far - I cant believe my ears! And these are stock - only two things were done to them - new foams and Lpads cleaned. Nothing else and I dont see why I would want to do anything else. At least not at this point. I tried all sorts of music - and they dont disappoint. Shine, really.Next to my Klipsch Heresy III - very close, slightly more mellow with lower bass. Only thing I can sort of complain about - they seem to be sensative to poor recordings - it shows right away if recording is not great. Some of my other speakers are more forgiving. I tried these Machs with a Denon DRA-635R, which is pretty respectable 80WPC receiver and now have them connected to my Optonica SA-5605 and they sound absolutely superb! I am not surprised that these bring high dollar if you can find them.
Ok, on to the pics:
DSC00058.JPG DSC00059.JPG DSC00060.JPG DSC00061.JPG
 
Register to hide this ad
Well, ever since I added these Mach Threes to my collection, they get 90% of my listening time. I would say its pretty good considering the company they are in. Very good speakers, if you ask me.
 
I have always loved the mach series. Seems like I run into them all the time. I buy them, refoam them and send them off to a new home. Here's a thread with a picture of all 3 together:

https://audiokarma.org/forums/index...visual-comparison-1-2-3.945725/#post-14463621

I think if I find another pair of NICE twos for the right price, I'll keep them. Seems like while I do find Mach 2's all the time, the cabinets and/or grilles are usually pretty rough. To my old tin ear, and the types of music I listen to, I didn't really notice much difference between the 2 and 3. The Mach One is completely different though. I ran Mach Ones for years. Believe it or not, the main thing I got tired of was dusting the exposed horns, lol.
 
Those horns do get dusty. Lol.
Having heard, but never owned Mach one and two, I much prefer threes. My good friend has twos and to me - difference is night and day. But I suppose everyone has their own preferences
 
I bought the Mach Ones in 1976 packaged with the STA 90 receiver. I always thought the Mach Ones where missing something. They sounded great with my Aerosmith and Rush LP's cranked, But came up short when listening to many pop tunes at more reasonable SPL's.

I might have been happier with the Nova 8 large bookshelves. They seem to do it all very well.

I would like to hear the Mach 3's myself to see if they have the fuller sound I was looking for. Taken to the other extreme I've heard some highly regarded monitor style speakers that had a flat, boring sound. Some manufacturers have found that perfect balance between the two.
 
Last edited:
I'd like to hear some Mach Three's for myself after reading this. I had come into some Mach Two's years ago sans woofers. I filled the holes with some Realistic OTC 15's and they were great. At the time the big mod was putting the drivers in larger more suitably larger enclosures which I planned but never got around to. I still have the drivers and crossovers and one day I'll get around to putting them into those larger boxes. One thing I did discover is that they love power. Switching from a 100 w.p.c. receiver to a 170 w.p.c. power amp the speakers really blossomed. Those big 15's were much more dynamic all across their frequency range. If you have any of the Mach series you owe it to your ears to hear them driven by big power.
 
This thread has me wondering which of the Mach series speakers had the best tweeter? The One, Two or I believe the two different ones used in the Three?
 
All though odd looking if you pay attention to what the tweeter in the ones is actually doing, I thought it was excellent, very articulate.
 
All though odd looking if you pay attention to what the tweeter in the ones is actually doing, I thought it was excellent, very articulate.

With the mid being so dominant after the VL refresh of the mids you can tell better what the tweeter is doing. The tweeter has a very crisp presentation (which I think all tweeters should do) and in its application is one of my all-time favorites.
 
Are those Celestions standing on top?

My own experience with Mach2 was very positive. I expected boomy bass and not much else, but the midrange and treble was very presentable. Particularly after the crossover mods.

Lee.
 
Congratulations! I bet they aren't as good as I think I remember but I loved the Mach series. I Mach Ones as a youngster, pair with one of the Realistic receivers. I'm bad with numbers and can't remember which one. At that time it was the best I ever had. Then I wanted 3's but life got in the way of my journey for a while.
 
T
Congratulations! I bet they aren't as good as I think I remember but I loved the Mach series. I Mach Ones as a youngster, pair with one of the Realistic receivers. I'm bad with numbers and can't remember which one. At that time it was the best I ever had. Then I wanted 3's but life got in the way of my journey for a while.

Mach threes may be better than you think. I didn't expect for them to be so good. Every day I listen to them, I like them more and more
 
Back
Top Bottom