gammarabbit
New Member
Hi all,
I've had a handful of great vintage amps over the years but all of them have ended up crapping out on me in one way or another. The most recent casualty is my long-loved Kenwood KR-4070, which I passed along to an acquaintance for parts.
I am now in the market for a new receiver or integrated amp to pair with my EPI 100s.
I would ideally like to go vintage, because somehow the sound has always felt "right" to me--particularly the power, depth, and textural quality of low frequencies. The one or two newer amps I have owned have been good too, but a little more clinical and "separate" sounding (which is a positive to many).
Somehow these modern guys have always felt like they were lacking that richness in the low end.
I should say these are all low- to mid-priced modern amps, i.e. <$700
I do not have a high budget and would ideally like to have something that will last me awhile without repair costs and related headaches. But the sound is also so important to me. I loved how my 4070 sounded sweet and dynamic at low volumes and put out deep and textured bass even at those "bedtime" listening levels.
So I find myself with a couple options:
1. Buy a "warm"-ish newer amp (I'm looking at Onkyo A-9555 and Marantz PM series) that is less likely to need expensive repairs in the near-future than a vintage piece. Some say the more "vintage-sounding" newer amps like these are darn close in sound to the 70s ones.
OR
2. Scoop another vintage amp (maybe even another 4070) and pay a repair shop to restore it for me (either now or when it inevitably craps).
Option two will cost me much more money -- probably $200-300 for the amp and another $400-$600 for restoration. The A-9555, for instance, can be had second hand for far, far less, and probably wouldn't need repairs for a very long time.
So my qualm is, is it really worth that much to go vintage? Will the $500 restoration cost even provide any kind of security that the amp isn't going to poop out on me again, or develop some other problem?
And I will ask too, to those who have used both vintage and modern amps: Do you think I might warm up to the sound of modern amps (like the Onkyo or Marantz PM), or do you think I should keep chasing that vintage sound?
I've had a handful of great vintage amps over the years but all of them have ended up crapping out on me in one way or another. The most recent casualty is my long-loved Kenwood KR-4070, which I passed along to an acquaintance for parts.
I am now in the market for a new receiver or integrated amp to pair with my EPI 100s.
I would ideally like to go vintage, because somehow the sound has always felt "right" to me--particularly the power, depth, and textural quality of low frequencies. The one or two newer amps I have owned have been good too, but a little more clinical and "separate" sounding (which is a positive to many).
Somehow these modern guys have always felt like they were lacking that richness in the low end.
I should say these are all low- to mid-priced modern amps, i.e. <$700
I do not have a high budget and would ideally like to have something that will last me awhile without repair costs and related headaches. But the sound is also so important to me. I loved how my 4070 sounded sweet and dynamic at low volumes and put out deep and textured bass even at those "bedtime" listening levels.
So I find myself with a couple options:
1. Buy a "warm"-ish newer amp (I'm looking at Onkyo A-9555 and Marantz PM series) that is less likely to need expensive repairs in the near-future than a vintage piece. Some say the more "vintage-sounding" newer amps like these are darn close in sound to the 70s ones.
OR
2. Scoop another vintage amp (maybe even another 4070) and pay a repair shop to restore it for me (either now or when it inevitably craps).
Option two will cost me much more money -- probably $200-300 for the amp and another $400-$600 for restoration. The A-9555, for instance, can be had second hand for far, far less, and probably wouldn't need repairs for a very long time.
So my qualm is, is it really worth that much to go vintage? Will the $500 restoration cost even provide any kind of security that the amp isn't going to poop out on me again, or develop some other problem?
And I will ask too, to those who have used both vintage and modern amps: Do you think I might warm up to the sound of modern amps (like the Onkyo or Marantz PM), or do you think I should keep chasing that vintage sound?
