I have no "pecking order".
Quite frankly, concerning most of the "Vintage" JBL speakers, I like them all. I've been listening to the L-100, 4311 & 4312 variants for over 36 years. As much as I liked my Pioneer SA-9100/TX-9100 combo that I still have, I did "upgrade" (IMHO) to a Crown PSL-2, PFM-3 and multiple PS-400s.
I use a Dbx 3BX and a Soundcraftsman EQ. I have "equalized" the room and continue to be very well pleased with the results. I am not in search of any upgrades to "improve" the sound of my system. I'm just very pleased with what I have assembled.
Is their better sound out there?
Probably.
Are there "better" JBLs out there?
Probably
Am I missing anything with the system I have?
I doubt it.
In the last year I have added 2 beautiful Crown SX824 RTRs that I have desired for a long time, as well as a Crown RTA-2 Real-Time Analyzer.
I've also added a Pioneer RT-1050 1/2 track RTR deck and a nice little Teac A2300-SX to play my older and 3.75 ips tapes on.
I wouldn't pass up a good opportunity to acquire some of the later 4400 series speakers at a good price. I still have a good possibility of acquiring some L-300s at below market price.
I appreciate the vast experience that others have with JBL models that I don't. It's good information to have, especially from someone that shares my good taste in speakers and amplifiers.
But I'm really happy where I'm at. Trust me, it sounds good!
I learned back when I sold stereo that individual tastes vary. Viva la difference!
Perhaps some time I will have the opportunity to join you for a nice "listening" session. :thmbsp:
You do understand that someone may just start getting into JBL vintage and is looking for advice? What you said 'they are all good' really doesn't help.
I made the assumption early in this thread that the pecking order should be based on sound quality, not rarity or expense. The Paragon is a real icon but not because of its audio quality. It is a beautiful contemporary piece of furniture with very adequate sound quality that is surpassed by dozens of other JBLs, past and present.Not that I own one or have ever actually seen or heard one but shouldn't the Paragon be on this list?
I never intended mine to be an "ultimate" list. I said it was off the top of my head as a brief snapshot of opinion. It has already been pointed out that I forgot to list the 4313B. I see there's no 4411 listed, either. Those should certainly be there. I'm sure there are others, including many I own which I purposely left off the list (L80T/3). Others I listed just because of my familiarity with them but there are many others that would shove the L26 and L36 down of off the list and many would insist the L26 should be listed above the L36. So there is no end to this. My list was written, as I said, "quickly and without a lot of thought." I've heard a Paragon, back when they were new. Would I love to own one? Sure! Would I take a Paragon over a DD67000 . . . for the same money? Hell no!I notice a couple recommendations for L150A (not L150) as if the L150 is a bad speaker. I have a pair of the L150's and that are one fine pair of speakers. I have not heard them next to the A version, but they sound better than anything else I have owned. Do not shy away.

Everest-II DD66000
1400 Array
L300 Summit
250Ti (other L250 variants fall short)
Century Gold
240Ti
L150A (not L150)
L200B (not A)
120Ti (L100T/3 lesser interest)
L212
L112
L96
L166
L65 Jubal
18Ti (L20T, etc)
L36
L26
(Note: No L100 variants.)
Pro monitors
4345
4350
4355
4343
4450
4333
4435
4430
4412
4410
4425
Many, many others.
4450 is probably where the 4435 should have been, in fact it looks like the 4435, 30, and 25 should all move up a slot with the 4412 and 4410 probably equivalent to the 4425 depending on your preference for bi-radial versus titanium tweet three-ways.BMWCCA, I'm amazed that you ranked 4435s so far down your pro list, unless you can hear above 16 KHz (I can't). Just for another POV, having had them, L250s, 250Tis, 4430s and many other JBLs, I am astounded at how good the 4435s sound. When I played them against my 4430s it was a night and day difference, and their bass is not to be believed.
I would bump them up above any of the single 15" woofer models you list, except maybe the 4343s; I think it takes single 18" woofers or dual 15s to compete. In objective terms of bass extension, dispersion, distortion, dynamics, imaging, power handling, sensitivity, durability and ease of service, I might argue that they are at least peers of anything in the 434X and 435X ranges.
I would also bump the 4425s up a few spots, for similar reasons.
Also, is there a 4450 model? I couldn't find it with a Google search. But otherwise, your lists seem at least defensible.

I auditioned a pair of 4435s at one point - seemed shrill and headache-inducing.
Maybe the crossovers needed recapping, maybe the diaphrams were cheap copies, I'll never know.
I auditioned a pair of 4435s at one point - seemed shrill and headache-inducing.
Maybe the crossovers needed recapping, maybe the diaphrams were cheap copies, I'll never know.
Was a great deal, even if they were huge -
but I turned them down and wound up with other speakers I liked better later that year.